Talk:The London Encyclopaedia

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Naming

Note on naming. It is "The London Encyclopaedia", and is not merely the "London Encyclopaedia".

Not to be confused with the Encyclopaedia Londonensis, 24 vol 1810, though in contemporary literature it is sometimes cited The London EncyclopadiaApwoolrich 17:55, Jun 28, 2004 (UTC)

NPOV

I question the neutrality of this article, with its statement that the book "unarguably lives up to the back cover plaudit..." To quote one review on amazon.co.uk, "Unfortunately there are many errors, some very bad..." Similar views have been expressed to me by more than one local history librarian in London. I'm not proposing that any negative criticism be introduced to the article but I believe that the favourable remarks should be removed or rephrased. Russ London 13:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]