Wikipedia:Peer review/Torah reading/archive1
Needs references; needs more inclusion of non-Orthodox practices; needs a section on history and origin of the practice; can doubtless use some fixes throughout. —msh210 02:13, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Well thats the kind of observations you are expected to help implement fixes for, not list it and expect others to. See the guidelines above. - Taxman 19:40, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
- So should I try adding {{POV check}} to the article, adding {{Attention}} to the Origins/History section, and adding the article to PNA — instead of listing the article here? —msh210 20:10, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Yes basically. Or better yet, just commit to implimenting fixes of problems you see and ask for advice and observations from other editors, and implement those as best you can. Not that many people are familiar with the subject enough to fix all the issues, so if you are, please do so. What I have described is what PR is for. - Taxman 15:03, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
- So should I try adding {{POV check}} to the article, adding {{Attention}} to the Origins/History section, and adding the article to PNA — instead of listing the article here? —msh210 20:10, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
What kind of references are we looking for - it seems that this article was written based on personal experience, not based on sources. Once history and origins are included, references will probably be required. I think there is a midrash that Moshe/Moses instituted Monday and Thursday Torah reading, but I'm not sure of a source - if someone can verify, it can be included in the article. chaitov 05:48, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Even personal experience of halacha-based events can have sources in halachic works. —msh210 14:47, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- All articles on Wikipedia should be based on research of the most reliable resources on a given subject. We are a reference work, not a catologue of personal opinion. - Taxman 15:03, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)