Talk:Central Hawke's Bay District

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

How does one insert index items for search terms? People looking for Central Hawke's Bay are more likely to search for "central hawkes bay" or "Central Hawkes Bay" than "Central Hawke's Bay District".

Can anyone confirm that the content on this article is taken from the CENTRAL HAWKE'S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL website with permission ? It reads word for word from http://www.chbdc.govt.nz/about_CHB/population/ and could be a copyvio. --Nickj69 19:40, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I work for the Central Hawke's Bay District Council and confirm there is no copyright violation. The original text is from a 1998 document on Central Hawke's Bay and employment written by Lisa Metcalfe in her role as Local Employment Co-ordinator. Lisa Metcalfe holds the copyright and gives permission for its use on the CHB District Council site and on this site. Thrashcardiom 23:50, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Territorial Authority

Central Hawke's Bay is not a territorial authority. It is a district which happens to be administered by a territorial authority known as Central Hawke's Bay District Council.

Population Estimate The population estimate on the page seems to be wildly out of whack with reality. The 2006 census, the best estimate of population, has the population at 12,954 which is an increase of only 126 over the 2001 census. Should the page revert back to the official 2006 census figure? Thrash Cardiom (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]