Seems to have no notability of her own. Only 300 hits for "Donna Peele" to begin with, and if you look at the titles and excerpts, they are virtually all articles about Charlie Sheen or short-lived marriages in general. Some are about at least two other "Donna Peele"s. About the only one that's about her, that isn't about the marriage, is a laundry list of clients of Vera Wang. Also, note that none of the articles call her a "supermodel", just "model"--"Donna Peele" supermodel gets zero hits. Niteowlneils 16:59, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
This is just another "sub-substub" from the idiot who signs on via a different proxy each time, drops his/her load (I'm leaning toward "her" based on the subject matter) and then leaves a mess for the rest of us to clean up. Though I'm the one who listed it for cleanup, I wholeheartedly support deleting this and I support the notion of bending the rules a bit and speed-deleting this individual's nonsense on sight. Better a red link than a blue one leading to something nearly useless, IMO. - Lucky 6.9 17:12, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Oi, mate! Guys watch soaps too. But I totally understand (especially regarding this IP range's contribs). Delete.TheCustomOfLife 22:24, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I saw this one when you listed it for cleanup, fired it up in the editor, and like Niteowlneils did the Google thing. I then retreated in confusion, since there was literally nothing I could find to add other than the date of her wedding. Which scarcely seemed worthwhile. So I too must, concur, Delete. —Stormie 00:36, Jun 15, 2004 (UTC)
If this is all that can be said about her, Delete. Average Earthman 12:40, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
