Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motherhood and how it protects against ovarian cancer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete. Eugene van der Pijll 21:10, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
POV title, POV content, not wikified and totally unsubstantiated. Also note Motherhood and protection against ovarian cancer, a duplicated location (and now a redirect). violet/riga (t) 09:36, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Merge the verifiable/encyclopedic parts (if any) to ovarian cancer. Radiant_* 13:40, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete outright. Let's let others (with references) edit ovarian cancer without attempting a merge of this to there. The article is an announcement and POV. For what it's worth, what it says is true, and there are increasing epidemiological studies showing that poor countries without birth control have low incidence of ovarian cancer (and menopause) because women are pregnant much of the time, but that's beside the point. Geogre 15:33, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Leave suggestion to research this at Ovarian cancer. However, this is POV titled and unsubstantiated. Delete. Mgm|(talk) 16:43, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and how it protects against POV announcements. Nestea 22:11, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete pro-natalist tripe. Kaibabsquirrel 00:42, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete quack opinion piece. ~~~~ 16:47, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.