This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
This article is a shame. It just tries to allocate African slavery to Spain and Portugal, whereas the involvement of Spain in slavery was residual, and Portugal, although higher, not at all comparable with England and the Netherlands. These countries were the main drivers of and profited from that slave trade (not to speak about the genocide of Indians, whose rights -up to the standards of the times- were recognized and respected by the Spaniards. 2A01:C22:85D3:8100:B340:94FD:6BE0:ED8F (talk) 12:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, as far as the Atlantic trade goes, Portugal was the single largest slave-trader and Brazil, Portugal's colony, the single largest destination. Portugal started earlier than anyone else and continued up through the mid-19th century after other countries had abolished it. Britain was #2, overtaking Portugal in the 1730s but abolishing the trade in 1807. Spain was lower but that is because it used other nations to ship slaves to its colonies, and also relied on indigenous labour systems like the encomienda. LastDodo (talk) 17:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That is simply not true. England and the Netherlands. Also France. Encomiendas were far from being real slavery (at least by the standards of those times), and abolished forty years after the discovery of America, practically at the same time that the employment of (very limited compared with others) slave African labour was terminated. Not comparable with Dutch and English (also French...) practices continuing well into the 19th century (Notwithstanding the fact that the South African regime that lasted till the end of the XX century or the US segregation that lasted till the second half of that century are directly inherited from those English and Dutch noble gentlemen. Black legend, black legend. Again: look at how many african descent people are there in Spanish former colonies compared to US, Canada, and (French and Dutch) Antilles. That is black legend. 2A01:C22:905D:9700:6DC7:9094:EBFE:636 (talk) 13:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are a number of errors and misunderstandings there, however I do not see it as my responsibility to continue to educate some random person on Wikipedia who hasn't bothered to create a username. I will however defend the points I made, but it is not clear you actually challenged any of them. Are you denying Portugal was the largest slave trader? Are you denying Brazil, Portugal's colony, was the single largest destination? Are you denying Portugal began earlier than anyone else and continued up into the mid-19th century? Are you denying Spain used other countries to ship slaves to its colonies, or that it used other labour systems? Spain only abolished slavery in its colony Cuba in 1886. Brazil, Portugal's former colony, only abolished it in 1888. LastDodo (talk) 14:17, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I read and comprehend, but what you wrote is mostly based on misunderstandings. You have ignored my questions, so I am going to stop now. As AndytheGrump says, if you want to make changes to the article you need to provide reliable sources. Put up or.. be quiet. LastDodo (talk) 10:16, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It so crazy that no one ask about the 500,000 irish slaves or the 4 million slaviv slaves that came to America during so called Atlantic slave trade.? 98.33.104.78 (talk) 01:33, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is similarly insane that historians won't acknowledge the 1,896,223 unicorns that fought in the United States revolution or the role of squonks in the Pennsylvania legislature! Dumuzid (talk) 01:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
The redirect Enslaved Africans has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 26 § Enslaved Africans until a consensus is reached. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)