User talk:Molloy

NZNF

Molloy, thanks for your note about the copyright issue. As you know, we're claiming fair use, but if there are still concerns, it would be helpful if one of the NZNF leaders or the official spokesperson could outline those concerns, either on a talk page or by e-mail (via the "e-mail this user" function on the user pages), together with some evidence, or a clear statement, that the NZNF is the copyright holder. Many thanks, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 04:01, May 11, 2005 (UTC)

Also, about the quote you posted by jpgordon, I have a solution for you: "Dealing with grievances - If you think an administrator has acted improperly against you or another editor, you should express your concerns directly to the administrator responsible. Try and come to a resolution in an orderly and civil manner. However, if the matter is not resolved between the two parties, you can take further action according to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. There have been a number of alternative procedures suggested for the removal of sysop status but none of them have achieved consensus." This is from the Administrator Page of Wikipedia. If you have questions, just ask him or another admin. Though, it is true that many on here do not wish to tollerate those who spoute hate (me included), we try to set aside differences while on here. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 02:52, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. - Molloy

Plus, I am sorry if I was harsh on you earlier. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:00, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yom Kippur War

Yom Kippur War Please take a look. The same old problem. --Dogtag 02:06, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Images you upload

Please learn WP:RULES regarding adding images and provide source and copyright info for Image:Unzionist.jpg. For examples of using political cartoons, see e.g. propaganda or anti-Semitism. Note that this is an encyclopedia, not a blog: we do not take sides. ←Humus sapiens←Talk 03:28, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The image came from http://www.inminds.co.uk/un-zionist.jpg, though no copyright on this website of the photo. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:49, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is also featured here [1] - Molloy

Molloy, go ahead and tag it as fair use or PD. Just like many photos you and I have discussed about, we have no clue who made it, when it was made, and what rules it has. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:58, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Copied this from my Talk page because it belongs to this discussion. I must say that claiming PD for an offensive image of unknown origin and then switching it to fairuse... doesn't smell good. ←Humus sapiens←Talk 04:48, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Unzionist.jpg was released into the public domain. It depicts a Zionist using the UN to hang a Palestinian, I think it would be welcome in the Zionism article in order to portray the Palestinian view of the Zionist movement. - Molloy

Public domain is not fairuse, so which is being claimed? And released by whom? El_C 09:52, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am claiming fair use. - Molloy

Titanic image

You recently uploaded Image:Titanic belford.gif. Can you please add the image's copyright information? Thanks MechBrowman June 29, 2005 14:34 (UTC)

The work is in the public domain, I have edited the image page with the info. - Molloy

Thanks MechBrowman June 30, 2005 14:54 (UTC)

Image:Foxman.jpg

What is the source of this image, and what grounds are there for the claim that it's copyright-free? I'm holding off on labelling it a copyvio for the moment (but please don't use it in an article until its status has been clarified). Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 5 July 2005 15:01 (UTC)

The Image was taken from the website of Focal Point Publications [2], and after contacting their webmaster to attain the copyright status, he infomed me that the image was released into the public domain by the photographer and is freely distributed. Molloy

I'm a little squeamish about contacting a Holocaust-Denial site, so I'll leave it there. I know that dirt can't rub off via e-mail, but still.... The source tends to confirm, however, that the image is meant to constitute an attack on its subject, and I shall support the effort to keep it out of the article. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 6 July 2005 09:53 (UTC)

Well, its not an attack on the subject, just an image of him. It's a well known fact that Abraham Foxman is not a nice guy, so I don't see why we should portray him as one. Molloy

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 6 July 2005 10:24 (UTC)

And that is exactly the reason to leave the picture there, it was the first image that came up on Google Image search, so chances are it is a good representation of him. To remove the image would indicate a point of view in favour of Foxman. Molloy 6 July 2005 10:36 (UTC)

What does the order of links on Google have to do with the accuracy of photos? There should be a photo that's neither flattering nor the opposite; that's what "neutrality" means. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 6 July 2005 16:04 (UTC)

Jayjg has violated 3RR

Guy, the rule is against more than three reverts within 24 hours, so no, he hasn't violated the rule. --Calton | Talk 6 July 2005 05:44 (UTC)

My mistake, sorry about that Molloy 6 July 2005 05:46 (UTC)

Image:Nfleaflet2.JPG has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Nfleaflet2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Nfleaflet.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Nfleaflet.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image Tagging Image:Num rall.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Num rall.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 22:38, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Cale olsen.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cale olsen.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 22:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:NZNFleaflet2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:NZNFleaflet2.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 14:58, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Al_jolson.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Al_jolson.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Neonazimarch.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Neonazimarch.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]