Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tabatha Jordan

Tabatha Jordan was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was CONSENSUS NOT REACHED

• if the terms yiff, and pocket packs are listed this should. plus all it needs is alittle more info and a pic to be totally ligit.

MaximusNukeage 03:28, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC) Brief stub about an exotic dancer. Was created by an anon, speedy-deleted by User:DavidWBrooks (although I'm not sure it was a valid speedy candidate), recreated by the anon, then blanked by another anon. —Stormie 06:12, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)

• Appears to be, shall we say, "notable." Google gives over 100,000 hits. Alexa rank is 61,692. I give it a weak keep, although the article needs some work. --Slowking Man 06:17, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
  • I think any web search is going to be rather biased in favor of nude models. Postdlf 07:13, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Keep in the weakest way. However, even if her breasts are her most notable feature, I'm not sure "Tabatha Jordan is an exotic model with big breasts" does it for me.Dr Zen 06:19, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• Delete: pr0ncruft. Wile E. Heresiarch 13:50, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: I've said it every time: we can't chase down nude performers. There are tens and tens of thousands, and each makes movies at a pace that makes you fear for their reproductive health, and then they're gone, all in about 3 years, with only the medical bills remaining. Furthermore, the porn industry has attempted to create a soap opera-like following for its actresses and studios, so "fans" will have a lot of irrelevancy to say about each actress/model. Good luck to the lady in med school, and the author in his darkness, but not encyclopedic. A physical attribute is not an achievement. Geogre 13:53, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup. Radman1 16:22, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. It's my understanding that he internet is full of women who will show off their large breasts. Can't see anything that makes her more notable than any of the others. Besides, do we need to promote porn sites here (ie, the link to her homepage)? -R. fiend 20:34, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree that porn-related searches and site rankings are highly misleading. That said, I only get 26,000 for "Tabatha Jordan"--33,000 for another randomly picked porn name "cynara fox". A willingness to be publically nude doesn't alone seem particularly encyclopedic. Niteowlneils 00:09, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Cynara? Cynara is a porn name? Oh, say it ain't so... I have forgot much, Cynara! gone with the wind, Flung roses, roses riotously with the throng, Dancing, to put thy pale, lost lilies out of mind; But I was desolate and sick of an old passion, Yea, all the time, because the dance was long: I have been faithful to thee, Cynara! in my fashion. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:23, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC) P. S. And I like artichokes, too.
• Delete. Indrian 00:11, Oct 26, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:23, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. --Improv 07:37, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Mikkalai
• Err on the side of caution and keep —siroχo 14:21, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. we cant list every big boobed actress. -- Chris 73 Talk 10:07, Oct 31, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. I was surprised that there was not a more detailed and professional entry for Tabatha Jordan. There are many less worthy candidates (in various fields) that have not been called for deletion. Is there maybe a bias (POV) against Tabatha Jordan's profession creeping in? Because there is no size limit on Wikipedia I feel that, "we can't list every (item) of a particular (category)" is not a valid reson for deletion. (For instance, towns with just 100 people: Toyah, Texas). Definately notable - but then not everyone has heared of everyone else who is notable ;-) Zik-Zak 13:47, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.