Prime gap

Prime gap frequency distribution for primes up to 1.6 billion. Peaks occur at multiples of 6.

A prime gap is the difference between two successive prime numbers. The n-th prime gap, denoted g_n or g(p_n) is the difference between the (n + 1)-st and the n-th prime numbers, i.e.

$g_{n}=p_{n+1}-p_{n}.\$

We have g₁ = 1, g₂ = g₃ = 2, and g₄ = 4. The sequence (g_n) of prime gaps has been extensively studied; however, many questions and conjectures remain unanswered.

The first 60 prime gaps are:

1, 2, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 6, 2, 6, 4, 2, 4, 6, 6, 2, 6, 4, 2, 6, 4, 6, 8, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 14, 4, 6, 2, 10, 2, 6, 6, 4, 6, 6, 2, 10, 2, 4, 2, 12, 12, 4, 2, 4, 6, 2, 10, 6, 6, 6, 2, 6, 4, 2, ... (sequence A001223 in the OEIS).

By the definition of g_n every prime can be written as

$p_{n+1}=2+\sum _{i=1}^{n}g_{i}.$

Simple observations

The first, smallest, and only odd prime gap is the gap of size 1 between 2, the only even prime number, and 3, the first odd prime. All other prime gaps are even. There is only one pair of consecutive gaps having length 2: the gaps g₂ and g₃ between the primes 3, 5, and 7.

For any integer n, the factorial n! is the product of all positive integers up to and including n. Then in the sequence

$n!+2,\;n!+3,\;\ldots ,\;n!+n$

the first term is divisible by 2, the second term is divisible by 3, and so on. Thus, this is a sequence of n − 1 consecutive composite integers, and it must belong to a gap between primes having length at least n. It follows that there are gaps between primes that are arbitrarily large, that is, for any integer N, there is an integer m with g_m ≥ N.

However, prime gaps of n numbers can occur at numbers much smaller than n!. For instance, the first prime gap of size larger than 14 occurs between the primes 523 and 541, while 15! is the vastly larger number 1307674368000.

The average gap between primes increases as the natural logarithm of these primes, and therefore the ratio of the prime gap to the primes involved decreases (and is asymptotically zero). This is a consequence of the prime number theorem. From a heuristic view, we expect the probability that the ratio of the length of the gap to the natural logarithm is greater than or equal to a fixed positive number k to be e^−k; consequently the ratio can be arbitrarily large. Indeed, the ratio of the gap to the number of digits of the integers involved does increase without bound. This is a consequence of a result by Westzynthius.

In the opposite direction, the twin prime conjecture posits that g_n = 2 for infinitely many integers n.

Numerical results

Usually the ratio of ${\textstyle {\frac {g_{n}}{\ln(p_{n})}}}$ is called the merit of the gap g_n. Informally, the merit of a gap g_n can be thought of as the ratio of the size of the gap compared to the average prime gap sizes in the vicinity of p_n.

The largest known prime gap with identified probable prime gap ends has length 16,045,848, with 385,713-digit probable primes and merit M = 18.067, found by Andreas Höglund in March 2024. The largest known prime gap with identified proven primes as gap ends has length 1,113,106 and merit 25.90, with 18,662-digit primes found by P. Cami, M. Jansen and J. K. Andersen.

As of September 2022, the largest known merit value and first with merit over 40, as discovered by the Gapcoin network, is 41.93878373 with the 87-digit prime 2​9​3​7​0​3​2​3​4​0​6​8​0​2​2​5​9​0​1​5​8​7​2​3​7​6​6​1​0​4​4​1​9​4​6​3​4​2​5​7​0​9​0​7​5​5​7​4​8​1​1​7​6​2​0​9​8​5​8​8​7​9​8​2​1​7​8​9​5​7​2​8​8​5​8​6​7​6​7​2​8​1​4​3​2​2​7. The prime gap between it and the next prime is 8350.

Largest known merit values (as of October 2020)

Merit	gn	digits	pn	Date	Discoverer
41.938784	08350	0087	see above	2017	Gapcoin
39.620154	15900	0175	3483347771 × 409#/0030 − 7016	2017	Dana Jacobsen
38.066960	18306	0209	0650094367 × 491#/2310 − 8936	2017	Dana Jacobsen
38.047893	35308	0404	0100054841 × 953#/0210 − 9670	2020	Seth Troisi
37.824126	08382	0097	0512950801 × 229#/5610 − 4138	2018	Dana Jacobsen

The Cramér–Shanks–Granville ratio is the ratio of g_n / (ln(p_n))². If we discard anomalously high values of the ratio for the primes 2, 3, 7, then the greatest known value of this ratio is 0.9206386 for the prime 1693182318746371. Other record terms can be found at OEIS: A111943.

We say that g_n is a maximal gap, if g_m < g_n for all m < n. As of October 2024, the largest known maximal prime gap has length 1676, found by Brian Kehrig. It is the 83rd maximal prime gap, and it occurs after the prime 20733746510561442863. Other record (maximal) gap sizes can be found in OEIS: A005250, with the corresponding primes p_n in OEIS: A002386, and the values of n in OEIS: A005669. The sequence of maximal gaps up to the nth prime is conjectured to have about $2\ln n$ terms (see table below).

The 83 known maximal prime gaps

Number 1 to 28 # gn pn n 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 4 7 4 4 6 23 9 5 8 89 24 6 14 113 30 7 18 523 99 8 20 887 154 9 22 1,129 189 10 34 1,327 217 11 36 9,551 1,183 12 44 15,683 1,831 13 52 19,609 2,225 14 72 31,397 3,385 15 86 155,921 14,357 16 96 360,653 30,802 17 112 370,261 31,545 18 114 492,113 40,933 19 118 1,349,533 103,520 20 132 1,357,201 104,071 21 148 2,010,733 149,689 22 154 4,652,353 325,852 23 180 17,051,707 1,094,421 24 210 20,831,323 1,319,945 25 220 47,326,693 2,850,174 26 222 122,164,747 6,957,876 27 234 189,695,659 10,539,432 28 248 191,912,783 10,655,462

Number 29 to 56 # gn pn n 29 250 387,096,133 20,684,332 30 282 436,273,009 23,163,298 31 288 1,294,268,491 64,955,634 32 292 1,453,168,141 72,507,380 33 320 2,300,942,549 112,228,683 34 336 3,842,610,773 182,837,804 35 354 4,302,407,359 203,615,628 36 382 10,726,904,659 486,570,087 37 384 20,678,048,297 910,774,004 38 394 22,367,084,959 981,765,347 39 456 25,056,082,087 1,094,330,259 40 464 42,652,618,343 1,820,471,368 41 468 127,976,334,671 5,217,031,687 42 474 182,226,896,239 7,322,882,472 43 486 241,160,624,143 9,583,057,667 44 490 297,501,075,799 11,723,859,927 45 500 303,371,455,241 11,945,986,786 46 514 304,599,508,537 11,992,433,550 47 516 416,608,695,821 16,202,238,656 48 532 461,690,510,011 17,883,926,781 49 534 614,487,453,523 23,541,455,083 50 540 738,832,927,927 28,106,444,830 51 582 1,346,294,310,749 50,070,452,577 52 588 1,408,695,493,609 52,302,956,123 53 602 1,968,188,556,461 72,178,455,400 54 652 2,614,941,710,599 94,906,079,600 55 674 7,177,162,611,713 251,265,078,335 56 716 13,829,048,559,701 473,258,870,471

Number 56 to 83 # gn pn n 57 766 19,581,334,192,423 662,221,289,043 58 778 42,842,283,925,351 1,411,461,642,343 59 804 90,874,329,411,493 2,921,439,731,020 60 806 171,231,342,420,521 5,394,763,455,325 61 906 218,209,405,436,543 6,822,667,965,940 62 916 1,189,459,969,825,483 35,315,870,460,455 63 924 1,686,994,940,955,803 49,573,167,413,483 64 1,132 1,693,182,318,746,371 49,749,629,143,526 65 1,184 43,841,547,845,541,059 1,175,661,926,421,598 66 1,198 55,350,776,431,903,243 1,475,067,052,906,945 67 1,220 80,873,624,627,234,849 2,133,658,100,875,638 68 1,224 203,986,478,517,455,989 5,253,374,014,230,870 69 1,248 218,034,721,194,214,273 5,605,544,222,945,291 70 1,272 305,405,826,521,087,869 7,784,313,111,002,702 71 1,328 352,521,223,451,364,323 8,952,449,214,971,382 72 1,356 401,429,925,999,153,707 10,160,960,128,667,332 73 1,370 418,032,645,936,712,127 10,570,355,884,548,334 74 1,442 804,212,830,686,677,669 20,004,097,201,301,079 75 1,476 1,425,172,824,437,699,411 34,952,141,021,660,495 76 1,488 5,733,241,593,241,196,731 135,962,332,505,694,894 77 1,510 6,787,988,999,657,777,797 160,332,893,561,542,066 78 1,526 15,570,628,755,536,096,243 360,701,908,268,316,580 79 1,530 17,678,654,157,568,189,057 408,333,670,434,942,092 80 1,550 18,361,375,334,787,046,697 423,731,791,997,205,041 81 1,552 18,470,057,946,260,698,231 426,181,820,436,140,029 82 1,572 18,571,673,432,051,830,099 428,472,240,920,394,477 83 1,676 20,733,746,510,561,442,863 477,141,032,543,986,017

Further results

Upper bounds

Bertrand's postulate, proven in 1852, states that there is always a prime number between k and 2k, so in particular p_n +1 < 2p_n, which means g_n < p_n .

The prime number theorem, proven in 1896, says that the average length of the gap between a prime p and the next prime will asymptotically approach ln(p), the natural logarithm of p, for sufficiently large primes. The actual length of the gap might be much more or less than this. However, one can deduce from the prime number theorem an upper bound on the length of prime gaps:

For every $\epsilon >0$, there is a number $N$ such that for all $n>N$

$g_{n}<p_{n}\epsilon$.

One can also deduce that the gaps get arbitrarily smaller in proportion to the primes: the quotient

$\lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {g_{n}}{p_{n}}}=0.$

Hoheisel (1930) was the first to show that there exists a constant θ < 1 such that

$\pi (x+x^{\theta })-\pi (x)\sim {\frac {x^{\theta }}{\log(x)}}{\text{ as }}x\to \infty ,$

hence showing that

$g_{n}<p_{n}^{\theta },\,$

for sufficiently large n.

Hoheisel obtained the possible value 32999/33000 for θ. This was improved to 249/250 by Heilbronn, and to θ = 3/4 + ε, for any ε > 0, by Chudakov.

A major improvement is due to Ingham, who showed that for some positive constant c,

if $\zeta (1/2+it)=O(t^{c})$ then $\pi (x+x^{\theta })-\pi (x)\sim {\frac {x^{\theta }}{\log(x)}}$ for any $\theta >(1+4c)/(2+4c).$

Here, O refers to the big O notation, ζ denotes the Riemann zeta function and π the prime-counting function. Knowing that any c > 1/6 is admissible, one obtains that θ may be any number greater than 5/8.

An immediate consequence of Ingham's result is that there is always a prime number between n³ and (n + 1)³, if n is sufficiently large. The Lindelöf hypothesis would imply that Ingham's formula holds for c any positive number: but even this would not be enough to imply that there is a prime number between n² and (n + 1)² for n sufficiently large (see Legendre's conjecture). To verify this, a stronger result such as Cramér's conjecture would be needed.

Huxley in 1972 showed that one may choose θ = 7/12 = 0.58(3).

A result, due to Baker, Harman and Pintz in 2001, shows that θ may be taken to be 0.525.

In 2005, Daniel Goldston, János Pintz and Cem Yıldırım proved that

$\liminf _{n\to \infty }{\frac {g_{n}}{\log p_{n}}}=0$

and 2 years later improved this to

$\liminf _{n\to \infty }{\frac {g_{n}}{{\sqrt {\log p_{n}}}(\log \log p_{n})^{2}}}<\infty .$

In 2013, Yitang Zhang proved that

$\liminf _{n\to \infty }g_{n}<7\cdot 10^{7},$

meaning that there are infinitely many gaps that do not exceed 70 million. A Polymath Project collaborative effort to optimize Zhang's bound managed to lower the bound to 4680 on July 20, 2013. In November 2013, James Maynard introduced a new refinement of the GPY sieve, allowing him to reduce the bound to 600 and show that for any m there exists a bounded interval with an infinite number of translations each of which containing m prime numbers. Using Maynard's ideas, the Polymath project improved the bound to 246; assuming the Elliott–Halberstam conjecture and its generalized form, the bound has been reduced to 12 and 6, respectively.

Lower bounds

In 1931, Erik Westzynthius proved that maximal prime gaps grow more than logarithmically. That is,

$\limsup _{n\to \infty }{\frac {g_{n}}{\log p_{n}}}=\infty .$

In 1938, Robert Rankin proved the existence of a constant c > 0 such that the inequality

$g_{n}>{\frac {c\ \log n\ \log \log n\ \log \log \log \log n}{(\log \log \log n)^{2}}}$

holds for infinitely many values of n, improving the results of Westzynthius and Paul Erdős. He later showed that one can take any constant c < e^γ, where γ is the Euler–Mascheroni constant. The value of the constant c was improved in 1997 to any value less than 2e^γ.

Paul Erdős offered a $10,000 prize for a proof or disproof that the constant c in the above inequality may be taken arbitrarily large. This was proved to be correct in 2014 by Ford–Green–Konyagin–Tao and, independently, James Maynard.

The result was further improved to

$g_{n}>{\frac {c\ \log n\ \log \log n\ \log \log \log \log n}{\log \log \log n}}$

for infinitely many values of n by Ford–Green–Konyagin–Maynard–Tao.

In the spirit of Erdős' original prize, Terence Tao offered US$10,000 for a proof that c may be taken arbitrarily large in this inequality.

Lower bounds for chains of primes have also been determined.

Conjectures about gaps between primes

Prime gap function

Even better results are possible under the Riemann hypothesis. Harald Cramér proved that the Riemann hypothesis implies the gap g_n satisfies

$g_{n}=O({\sqrt {p_{n}}}\log p_{n}),$

using the big O notation. (In fact this result needs only the weaker Lindelöf hypothesis, if one can tolerate an infinitesimally larger exponent.) Later, he conjectured that the gaps are even smaller. Roughly speaking, Cramér's conjecture states that

$g_{n}=O\!\left((\log p_{n})^{2}\right)\!.$

Firoozbakht's conjecture states that $p_{n}^{1/n}\!$ (where $p_{n}$ is the nth prime) is a strictly decreasing function of n, i.e.,

$p_{n+1}^{1/(n+1)}\!<p_{n}^{1/n}{\text{ for all }}n\geq 1.$

If this conjecture is true, then the function $g_{n}=p_{n+1}-p_{n}$ satisfies $g_{n}<(\log p_{n})^{2}-\log p_{n}{\text{ for all }}n>4.$ It implies a strong form of Cramér's conjecture but is inconsistent with the heuristics of Granville and Pintz which suggest that $g_{n}>{\frac {2-\varepsilon }{e^{\gamma }}}(\log p_{n})^{2}$ infinitely often for any $\varepsilon >0,$ where $\gamma$ denotes the Euler–Mascheroni constant.

Meanwhile, Oppermann's conjecture is weaker than Cramér's conjecture. The expected gap size with Oppermann's conjecture is on the order of

$g_{n}<{\sqrt {p_{n}}}.$

As a result, under Oppermann's conjecture there exists $m$ (probably $m=30$) for which every natural number $n>m$ satisfies $g_{n}<{\sqrt {p_{n}}}.$

Andrica's conjecture, which is a weaker conjecture than Oppermann's, states that

$g_{n}<2{\sqrt {p_{n}}}+1.$

This is a slight strengthening of Legendre's conjecture that between successive square numbers there is always a prime.

Polignac's conjecture states that every positive even number k occurs as a prime gap infinitely often. The case k = 2 is the twin prime conjecture. The conjecture has not yet been proven or disproven for any specific value of k, but the improvements on Zhang's result discussed above prove that it is true for at least one (currently unknown) value of k ≤ 246.

As an arithmetic function

The gap g_n between the nth and (n + 1)st prime numbers is an example of an arithmetic function. In this context it is usually denoted d_n and called the prime difference function. The function is neither multiplicative nor additive.

See also

• Bonse's inequality
• Gaussian moat
• Twin prime

References

• Guy, Richard K. (2004). Unsolved problems in number theory (3rd ed.). Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-20860-2. Zbl 1058.11001.

Further reading

• Soundararajan, Kannan (2007). "Small gaps between prime numbers: the work of Goldston-Pintz-Yıldırım". Bull. Am. Math. Soc. New Series. 44 (1): 1–18. arXiv:math/0605696. doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-06-01142-6. S2CID 119611838. Zbl 1193.11086.
• Mihăilescu, Preda (June 2014). "On some conjectures in additive number theory" (PDF). EMS Newsletter (92): 13–16. doi:10.4171/NEWS. hdl:2117/17085. ISSN 1027-488X.

External links

• Thomas R. Nicely, Some Results of Computational Research in Prime Numbers -- Computational Number Theory. This reference web site includes a list of all first known occurrence prime gaps.
• Weisstein, Eric W. "Prime Difference Function". MathWorld.
• "Prime Difference Function". PlanetMath.
• Armin Shams, Re-extending Chebyshev's theorem about Bertrand's conjecture, does not involve an 'arbitrarily big' constant as some other reported results.
• Chris Caldwell, Gaps Between Primes; an elementary introduction
• Andrew Granville, Primes in Intervals of Bounded Length; overview of the results obtained so far up to and including James Maynard's work of November 2013.
• Birke Heeren, [1] Here you find the large prime number gaps and a paper on how to calculate such large gaps.