User talk:67.173.107.96

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires you to provide no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

The use of a username of your choice
The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link
Your own user page
Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address
The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you
The ability to rename pages
The ability to upload images
The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website
The eligibility to become an administrator
The right to be heard in formal votes and elections, and on pages like votes for deletion

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account.

Zzyzx11 | Talk 22:45, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Athlete stub articles

Hi!

Glad to see you're creating new articles about athletes. While you've been tagging many of those articles with {{bio-stub}} (and the effort is appreciated), you might consider using the more precise {{athlete-stub}} tag instead. The articles should be more likely to receive care and attention from appropriately specialized editors.

Happy editing. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 18:12, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Please close the brackets of birth dates after hockey plaeys' names. eg. Wayne Gretzky (born June 5, 1965). Simple, but crucial to do. Harro5 02:23, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)

Manchester United/History of Manchester United

Hi,

I noticed you'd been working on Man United-related pages and could do with your opinion on something.

The history section was split out of the page last year (I think) but someone then wrote another history section in the main page. Both pages are now well over the recommended maximum size for a Wikipedia article, and it's getting to the stage where I suspect people are editing them without reading them all the way through (which would explain why the Glazer takeover is mentioned twice in Manchester United, in roughly the same amount of detail each time.

So, my idea is to create new pages for different eras in United's history, merge the relevant bits of Alex Ferguson, History of Manchester United and the History section of Manchester United into each new page and put summaries of each new page on Manchester United, with comments asking people not to make the summaries too long. The new articles would have titles like:

Manchester United pre-1945
Manchester United 1945-1968
Manchester United 1968-1986
Manchester United 1986-present

I think something like this is necessary to keep the pages manageable, but obviously don't want to make such big changes to other people's work without hearing what people think first. Please let me know what you think, at the Manchester United talk page.

Thanks, Cantthinkofagoodname 11:09, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hermosillo Seris

Do you have any idea what a Seri is? Rick K 22:28, May 30, 2005 (UTC)

One Line Entries

Just something to think about. Adding a bunch of one line entries is considered bad form because it causes more work as often if something is only one line it gets deleted because its not considered important enough if it only has one line entered. Another thing to consider with it is lots of people use the red links (indicating no article) as a way to know what they should work on and if you have created a tiny one line article they don't know that it needs to be worked on. Would be a great help to add a little more detail than just one sentence like I noticed in some of the ABA team articles. Anyways great to see someone new in the community that is so enthusiatic! Keep it up! --Djsasso 22:32, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Team_Hawaii

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Team_Hawaii, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.--Parker007 19:26, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Portland Reign

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Portland Reign, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unnotable basketball team

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tavix (talk) 01:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Corey Bradford

A tag has been placed on Corey Bradford requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ridernyc (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daytona Beach Hawgs

The article Daytona Beach Hawgs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of meeting WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 02:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tupelo FireAnts

The article Tupelo FireAnts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Semi-professional football team that fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 03:49, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rome Renegades

The article Rome Renegades has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Semi-professional football team that fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 03:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of La Crosse Night Train

The article La Crosse Night Train has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 03:57, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Drummondville Voltigeurs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Drummondville Voltigeurs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Cards Against Humanity Baseball Place

The article The Cards Against Humanity Baseball Place has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a spoof website and redirect. Cited a newspaper site to confirm that the story offered by an earlier editor is a hoax. http://www.theherald-news.com/lists/2017/12/21/69ee87f197f7414bb35ce0d36ba8c421/index.xml

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beauty School Dropout (talk) 15:58, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fraser Hockeyland

The article Fraser Hockeyland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local little thing, no proof of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 04:36, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

735th top contributer by article count! (Top IP contributer by article count)

Congratulations to being Wikipedia's top IP contributer and 735th overall contributer (by article count; 1 May, 2022 update)!

Article count: Top IP contributer; 735th overall contributer

209.212.1.162 (talk) 17:49, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of McHugh Forum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article McHugh Forum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McHugh Forum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Roasted (talk) 00:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.