Talk:Henry Grey, Duke of Suffolk

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wrong Title

Henry Grey is the 2nd Duke of Suffolk as correctly mentioned in the article body. This page must be renamed. --NisansaDdS (talk) 04:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

OK, I'm just an ignorant Yank, but.... He was the first Duke of Suffolk, but married the daughter of the Duke of Suffolk?? The Brits eat cold toast, drink warm beer, and drive on the wrong side of the street; do they also marry their own daughters? Too Old 03:01, 2005 May 15 (UTC)

See my reply at Talk:Lady Frances Brandon.

Wrong lead picture

The lead picture is not Henry Grey, but Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester. Compare the National Portrait Gallery's versions: [1] and [2].

"jure uxoris"

The Brandon dukedom of Suffolk became extinct in 1551 and he was related to them through his wife, yes. Well, jure uxoris usually means that the wife actually holds the title. So why was he (as the article says) created Duek of Suffolk jure uxoris?--85.176.176.239 (talk) 01:41, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]