User talk:Palapala

Contents of this Talk page will be archived in /TalkArchive at irregular intervals.

Hi, the page attoparsec is in itself already a #redirect page; the contents of the former talk page was completely moved over by me, so I do not understand the reason for making talk:attoparsec a redirect as well... --Palapala 09:15, 2004 Mar 11 (UTC)

It was to prevent parallel discussions from taking place now that the content of Talk:attoparsec was a subset of that of Talk:strange units. -- Dissident 11:18, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Got that -- Would you know whether this linking takes place automatically when one uses the "move" feature (I did all the copying manually)?

It does if you check the appropiate checkbox. -- Dissident 22:59, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for supporting my nomination as an admin...

...I appreciate it. Dpbsmith 10:18, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Red links on VfD - these are apppearing as admins believe that some are speedy deletion candidates. Some are, and some may be more borderline... Secretlondon 19:41, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)

There appears to be no discussion... unless it is on IRC. Secretlondon 21:06, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Orphans

Orphan pages are pages that don't have any links to them. For a disambiguation page this is a good thing - although I think that if they are listed on the list of disambiguation pages they shouldn't make the orphaned pages list (I think they are cross referenced).

A redirect page that is an orphan isn't a problem either - an article that is an orphan is - a link to that page needs to be made somewhere. Secretlondon 18:23, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Franco German locomotive

Hi, I noticed your edit to the above, removing "A locomotive that for euroenthusiastic pushes to rise all the rest of European Union to became as the most powerful and splendid power of all times of the human mankind." Got to say I've been fighting a losing battle with this guy, similar fantastical claims have been posted on France and Germany. Thanks for helping out!! Mark 10:18, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Vacuum Propeller

I want to give some comments on Vacuum Propeller, as you are busily defending the article and stay on the sane side.

I'm all for including any bogus science, if it gets a notable and sustained coverage in public discussion. As an example see de:Biofoton and its VfD discussion. I don't think Vacuum Propeller qualifies on this aspect. Perpetuum Mobile heavily qualifies.
I'm all against this:
- There is a big problem X
- Given a minority view on physical theory Y, this problem is easily solved.
- We name this hypothetical solution Z and tell everybody about it, including prominent coverage in the Wikipedia

This is just sensationalist. This approch tries to compensate the speculative reasoning behind the solution, with the easiness of the hypothetical solution.

So, in my not so humble opinion, the right thing to present this, is in the article of "Physical Theory X". This also helps with the problem, that some inventors of hypothetical solutions are rather unclear, which theory their hypothesis should employ.

So, at Casimir effect, a carefully NPOVed statement about the hypothetical Vacuum Propeller may be added.

An if you are rather bold, you also can try the the Neutrino Plasma Propeller drive at Neutrino.

Pjacobi 08:40, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hello Palapala - I'm currently trying to get another article on Vacuum propeller accepted - and it has again been nominated for deletion by Pjacobi - could you take a look at the deletion discussion here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vacuum_propeller, and if so minded, add your contribution, whether in favour or not? Thanks WLD 10:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hubble-barn

Hubble-barn on List_of_strange_units_of_measurement was commented out by you with the edit summary of "last entry awaiting confirmation". What sort of confirmation were you looking for, and have you got it? I've added a note to the commented out portion explainting why, but it would be better to just add it or remove it if you have got your conformation...

Removed the commented-out section because I have been unable to verify the formula as given by the source... --Palapala 06:41, 2004 Oct 21 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Images

First of all, thanks for uploading all those images, particularly those from the Albert Hofman Foundation and those from SIDI Sportsmanagement. Just a few leftover images without image copyright tags.

Is Image:Airkz 2004-0129 poster la cage.jpg part of the movie poster? Then, you can tag that as {{poster}}.

Are Image:Airkz 20040716 metal paperclip.jpg and Image:Airkz 20040717 heinrich hertz turm00.jpg your own images? You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.

Just so you know. I put Image:Airkz 20040428 aram khachaturian.jpg and Image:Airkz 20040206 Karlsruhe Stadtwappen.png up for deletion because they're simply reduced size version of other images. You don't need to add reduced sized version since we can resize the image on the pages themselves.

Also, I curious why you believe Image:Airkz 20040205 orang utan.jpg to be in the public domain? It seems unlikely since this was from a company.

Lastly, looking at your tools page, I hope you don't still use that old HTML for images. I believe that this and this page can show you how to use the simplier (in my opinion) Wikipedia syntax. If you need help with anything at all, just let me know at my talk page. Thanks so much, Ricky81682 (talk) 09:34, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)

Image:Airkz 20040716 metal paperclip.jpg

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Airkz 20040716 metal paperclip.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 11:06, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

"Jury rig" etymology source

I've removed the cryptic reference to Walter William Skeat in Jury rig because it doesn't provide any concrete information. If you know in what work Skeat (first) provides this argument, please add it back with an appropriate citation in the References section. Thank you. — Jeff Q (talk) 01:11, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Airkz 20040129 les barbouzes.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Airkz 20040129 les barbouzes.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Airkz Images

Images you uploaded that are related to Airkz has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image Tagging for Image:Airkz_20040313_vladimir_vissotzki.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Airkz_20040313_vladimir_vissotzki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 13:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Airkz_20040517_vladimir_vysotsky_hamlet.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Airkz_20040517_vladimir_vysotsky_hamlet.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 10:15, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Airkz 20040617 jon regular expression.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Airkz 20040617 jon regular expression.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Airkz 20040221 laura didio.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Airkz 20040221 laura didio.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 08:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Airkz_20040517_vladimir_vysotsky_hamlet.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Airkz_20040517_vladimir_vysotsky_hamlet.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 18:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Robert Chambers (killer)

Robert Chambers (killer), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Robert Chambers (killer) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Chambers (killer) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Robert Chambers (killer) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — iridescent (talk to me!) 00:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Airkz 20040207 marlene jobert.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Airkz 20040207 marlene jobert.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eachwiped (talk) 21:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Airkz 20040701 rider on the rain ost cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Airkz 20040701 rider on the rain ost cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eachwiped (talk) 21:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Airkz 20040515 vladimir vysotsky tmpcbc.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Airkz 20040515 vladimir vysotsky tmpcbc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Airkz_20040617_sputnik1_nasahq.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Airkz_20040617_sputnik1_nasahq.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 01:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Airkz 20040217 yoni netanyahu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Airkz 20040217 yoni netanyahu.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Airkz 20040701 rider on the rain victim.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Airkz 20040701 rider on the rain victim.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Laura DiDio

I have nominated Laura DiDio, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura DiDio. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. *** Crotalus *** 18:33, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Pictures from Albert Hofmann Foundation

Wikipedia:Pictures from Albert Hofmann Foundation, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Pictures from Albert Hofmann Foundation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Pictures from Albert Hofmann Foundation during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 18:28, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Pictures from SIDI-Sportmanagement

Wikipedia:Pictures from SIDI-Sportmanagement, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Pictures from SIDI-Sportmanagement and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Pictures from SIDI-Sportmanagement during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 18:29, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]