User talk:Kocio
Here are some links I thought useful:
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:Help desk
- M:Foundation issues
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:List of images
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:Current polls
- Wikipedia:Mailing lists
- Wikipedia:IRC channel
Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The Wikipedia:Village pump is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
Sam [Spade] 14:15, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Blocked IP
[edit]{{unblock|83.19.130.66 is a valid IP address my firm hires from ISP.}}
- The address is blocked as an openproxy, that suggest that the software your firm is running to act as a proxy server to allow serveral computers to share the internet connction is misconfigured and allows computers from outside your firm to also connect through it to websites. Until that misconfiguration is fixed the IP address must stay blocked. If you talk to the people responsible and they fix the problem so it is no longer acting as an open proxy post the unblock tag again and we can recheck. --pgk(talk) 17:37, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|as far as I know this proxy is not accessible from the outside, please recheck}}
- Looks ok at the moment. --pgk(talk) 15:44, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
OpenType
[edit]Kocio, thank you for your interest in the OpenType article. It is true that one often finds single-sentence paragraphs in English. They are not necessarily bad or wrong. However, please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lead_section#Introductory_text. The instructions are for an opening paragraph which "should establish the context in which the topic is being considered, by supplying the set of circumstances or facts that surround it." This is standard Wikipedia practice. I think the lead paragraph needs to be rewritten with the history moved into the body, but splitting the first sentence from the opening paragraph does not help that. Thanks. Strebe (talk) 01:40, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
[edit]Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Scrubs (TV series). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Also, please make sure to use proper English. DKqwerty (talk) 14:32, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
double paragraph
[edit]Thank you for removing double paragraph. I lost everything when I realized I had failed to log in. I knew it was there but couldn't find it.
Suggestion to Merge 4 US related projects with Wikipedia:WikiProject United States
[edit]It has been suggested that 4 US related project be merged into Wikipedia:WikiProject United States due to a long state of inactivity. I noticed that you had made some edits to at least one of them recently so I thought you might want to voice your opinion about the merger. Please comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States#Close out some Inactive/nonfunctional US related WikiProjects. --Kumioko (talk) 18:46, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Should the summary part you created for Legacy be separated from the Voice section, since it also has to do with her voice? I'm not even sure Voice should have its own section, considering it is so small and her influence is also about her voice. This is why I originally combined Voice and influence. Also, sometimes the initial summaries are skipped in the table of contents when readers see that there are subsections. Take for example, the Legacy title; a lot of people will assume that there is nothing in that section and that it is only a title, opting to go straight for the subsections. This happened plenty of time on Wikipedia. Flyer22 (talk) 19:15, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for finding those refs so quickly! - Ahunt (talk) 13:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
[edit]Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited New American Library, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Public Domain Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Graphing calculator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Immersive journalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to 3D game
- Molecular structure (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Nuclei
- Ordoliberalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to German
- SGI Indigo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to DMA
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Mimi & Eunice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free culture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
As you were interested in the Public Domain Day, you may find this article of interest (for reading, expansion, or translation to pl wiki). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 18:31, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 21
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited GNU GRUB, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ubuntu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Akrit Jaswal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjab University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
OER inquiry
[edit]Hi Kocio, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:43, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Rick Aiello for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rick Aiello is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Aiello until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evan Prodromou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free culture. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CopyCamp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conference. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Fauchon
[edit]Hi. I have noticed that you intervened on the Fauchon page, and would like to ask for your help in watching this page. I would very much like to shorten and lighten the content, which is currently too long and contains numerous details, as other users have already pointed out.
Unfortunately, when I put forward new, shorter versions, they are systematically cancelled. I will improve in a few days the content by editing new versions and without deleting : could you help me by looking at the improvements I am trying to make to the page, when you have a moment? MrBeBe (talk) 13:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lev Manovich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of JOSM
[edit]The article JOSM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No assertion of importance of this product.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toddst1 (talk) 17:09, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "No assertion of importance of this product."? I simply can't agree:
- it's one of 2 most important editors for OSM (iD being dedicated for beginners, and this one for any advanced things)
- it has already 9 other language Wikipedia versions linked
- it is linked in Template:OpenStreetMap
- it has its own category on Commons
- so both OSM internal and Wikimedia-related facts are in favour of having it on English Wikipedia. - kocio (talk) 17:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suzanne Vega, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A&M. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Lover, Beloved etc.
[edit]Ten seconds of searching found me a page with a link to the redirect: you'd break that, for example. Remember that WhatLinksHere does not provide every URL that links to any page title: it provides only the list of Wikipedia pages that currently link to that title, nothing more. And finally, please read linkrot; creating it is almost never a good thing. Nyttend (talk) 12:05, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Kocio. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kocio. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Time server, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reference clock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kocio. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for January 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Substack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Online platform. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Samsung Galaxy S Plus for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samsung Galaxy S Plus, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsung Galaxy S Plus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)