Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Particles
Template
[edit]I modified the current template for classifying particles into this; I think it looks a bit better than the prior. Any suggestions or improvements are welcome.
| Electron | |
|---|---|
| Classification |
Elementary particle |
| Properties | |
| Mass | 9.10 × 10-31kg |
| Electric Charge | -1.6 × 10-19C |
| Spin | 1/2 |
| Color Charge | None |
| Interaction | Gravity, EM, Weak |
Electron mass defined using natural units.
[edit]Author: Don J. Stevens
The ratio of the electron Schwarzschild radius to the electron Compton wavelength is numerically related to the Planck unit of time. The Planck time is (hG/2 pi c exponent 5) exponent 1/2. The dimension (1.5) times the Schwarzschild radius is the gravitational photon capture radius 3Gm/c squared. The right hand side of the equation below is the smallest segment of time that can be resolved, divided by 2 pi seconds. This is proposed to be the gravitational time dilation limit.
2 pi(1.5)x(Schwarzschild radius)divided by(0.5)x(electron Comp. wavelength) = (3/2) exponent 1/2, times (Planck time)divided by(2 pi seconds)
When the reported value for the gravitational constant is used, with G = (6.67259 plus or minus 0.00085) times 10 exponent-11 m exponent 3, kg exponent -1, s exponent-2, the left side of the equation is equal to 1.0508161 times 10 exponent-44 while the right side is equal to 1.0507496 times 10 exponent-44. An argument can be made that both of these quantities or ratios should be equal. When these quantities are equal, the electron Compton wavelength and the electron mass can be defined by using the most basic units known, the Planck units. When this is done it is clear that the electron mass is quantized so that all electrons have the same mass. Both quantities will be equal when the gravitational constant has the specific value 6.6717456 times 10 exponent-11. This is just within the uncertainty range of the reported value. With both sides equal, the equation may be solved for the electron Compton wavelength. The product of Planck's constant and the specific gravitational constant value will be 4.4207445 times 10 exponent-44.
electron Compton wavelength = (4 pi) times (3 pi hG/c) exponent 1/4
electron Compton wavelength = 2.4263102 times 10 exponent-12 meters
From the Planck length, a very high energy photon wavelength can be defined that has the special property of having its energy defined either by the Planck constant or the gravitational constant. This type of "limit wavelength" is equal to (3/2) exponent 1/2, times (2 pi) times Planck length. The Planck length is (hG/ 2 pi c cubed) exponent 1/2.
limit wavelength = (3/2) exp. 1/2, times (2 pi) x (hG/2 pi c cubed) exp. 1/2
limit wavelength = (3 pi hG/c cubed) exponent 1/2
This wavelength photon has the energy density to produce a pair of black holes such that each black hole would have a photon capture radius (3Gm/c squared) equal to the photon wavelength divided by two pi. This photon has energy equal to (2/3) exponent 1/2 times the Planck mass energy.
3Gm/c squared = (wavelength) divided by (2 pi)
m = (h/2 c) divided by (wavelength)
2 pi (3G/c squared) times (h/2c) = (wavelength) exponent 2
(3 pi hG/c cubed) exponent 1/2 = wavelength
photon energy = 2(c exponent4 /3G) times (wavelength/2 pi)
Any wavelength photon (shown below as lambda) that is gravitationally blueshifted to the "limit wavelength" would appear to have the energy density needed to collapse further and materialize a pair of gravitationally confined particles, unless there is another requirement that must be met. Note that the blueshift ratio (limit wavelength/lambda) defines time dilation. This term is squared to obtain a size change factor because gravitational space contraction is expected to be an associated effect that is equal to gravitational time dilation.
(lambda)x(limit wavelength/lambda) exponent 2 = 2 pi(3Gm/c squared)
m = h/(2 lambda times c)
2 pi (3Gm/c squared) divided by (lambda) = (limit wavelength/lambda) exp. 2
For the electron, the other requirement is that the ratio (limit wavelength/lambda) squared will be equal to the gravitational time dilation limit. If equal time dilation factors are required, first to blueshift a photon to maximum energy density, and then to convert photon energy into gravitational field energy (by reducing the time rate as near as possible to zero seconds per second) each time dilation factor would be equal to the square root of the limit time dilation factor. When the first time dilation factor is specified as shown below, each particle will have mass energy equal to the electron mass.
time dilation = (1/2 pi) exponent 1/2 times (3/2) exponent 1/4, times (Planck time/one second) exponent 1/2
(limit wavelength) divided by (0.5)x(electron Compton wavelength) = (1/2 pi) exp. 1/2 times (3/2) exp. 1/4, times (Planck time/ one second) exp. 1/2
electron Compton wavelength = (4 pi) times (3 pi hG/c) exponent 1/4
The product of the gravitational time dilation blueshift factor and the (equal) time dilation factor that converts photon energy to gravitational field energy is equal to the ratio (1/2 pi) times (3/2) exponent 1/2 times (Planck time/one second). This is interpreted to be the gravitational time dilation limit. When the specific requirements are met, the electron mass is quantized. All electrons would then have mass equal to 1/2 of the limit wavelength photon mass energy, when this energy is reduced by the blueshift gravitational time dilation factor.
electron mass = (h/4 pi c) times (c/3 pi hG) exponent 1/4
In Einstein's theory, there is no minimum mass for a black hole. Very small mass black holes would look like elementary particles. They would be completely defined by their mass, charge and spin. Black hole theory predicts that a black hole with charge and spin will have magnetic moment equal to charge times angular momentum divided by mass. This correctly defines the electron magnetic moment without the small (g-factor) correction for emission and reabsorbing of virtual photons.
When a gamma ray photon interacts with an existing mass particle, it will encounter the ever slower time rate gradient that is the hallmark of a collapsed mass. The photon will be blueshifted in a predictable way to ever smaller wavelength dimensions as gravitational time dilation approaches zero seconds per second. If the photon has sufficient energy before being blueshifted to the limit wavelength, it can produce a pair of gravitatonally confined particles. A collapsed mass with charge and spin is usually defined as a Kerr-Newman black hole.
The process of producing light by oscillations of charged particles (usually electrons) is known to be reversible. Oscillating charges produce light while light particles (oscillating electromagnetic waves) when appropriately confined will produce charges in pairs. The quantized energy that will produce electron particles is defined by the "limit wavelength" photon and a blueshift time dilation factor.
The "limit wavelength" photon energy is correctly defined from light velocity and the gravitational constant. This photon energy can be used to determine the energy of any wavelength photon because energy is inversely proportional to wavelength.
photon energy = 2(c exponent 4 /3 G) times (limit wavelength/2 pi)
The mass (or energy) to wavelength relationship relationship for the electron can be simply expressed as a function of the gravitational constant. The electron Compton wavelength is (Comp.wl) in the equations below. The product of the specific G value and the electron mass is 6.0775479 times 10 exponent-41.
3Gm (2 pi) exponent 5 = (0.5 Comp.wl) exponent 3
3G (2 pi) exponent 5 = (0.5 Comp.wl) exponent 3 times (1/m)
m = (h/2c) divided by (0.5 Comp.wl)
3G (2 pi) exponent 5 = (2c/h) times (0.5 Comp.wl) exponent 4
h = 4 pi mc (3Gm) exponent 1/3, times (2 pi) exponent 2/3
These equations are correct when the electron Compton wavelength is 4 pi (3 pi hG/c) exponent 1/4 as determined earlier. The square root of the product of (limit wavelength) and the length (2 pi) squared times (c times one second) is the wavelength 2 pi (3 pi hG/c) exponent 1/4.
These relationships define either actual true electron Compton wavelength and mass values or extremely close wavelength and mass values, though there is presently no accepted theory that explains them.
Barions, mesons
[edit]I made some pictures with The Gimp about the quark structure of barions and mesons. You can see them here: hu:Kvark The Gimp sources (and pictures) are here: http://www.szgti.bmf.hu/harp/gnu/particle-physics You can use it under GPL. -- Harp 13:07, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
There is a page at Wikimedia Commons: commons:Particle Physics. There are useful pictures. -- Harp 16:45, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Project directory
[edit]Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory. This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 00:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia Day Awards
[edit]Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 18:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC)