Jump to content

Talk:2001 Gujarat earthquake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

There is some different information in the latter of the two external links including many pictures (copyright not sure) of the damage in the area. It also has link to many publications on this subject.

Death toll

[edit]

20,000 or 30,000? it took place neer the col centre- Nath 22:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to Malcolm Skinner 'Access To Geography: Hazards' ISBN 0-340-84636-4, the death toll was 19,000 -not 30,000 217.44.43.169 17:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are some discrepancies between sources, but the major databases have all converged toward similar numbers. I'm putting this in table form for ease of perusal. Elriana (talk) 14:49, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths Injuries Reference
20,000 166,800 USGS PAGER-CAT [1]
21,045 166,852 CRED and US-OFDA (EM-DAT) [2]
20,005 166,836 NCEI (formerly NGDC) [3]
18,000 167,000 Columbia News [4]
15,000 100,000 India Times (the day of the event)[5]

References

  1. ^ USGS (September 4, 2009), PAGER-CAT Earthquake Catalog, Version 2008_06.1, United States Geological Survey
  2. ^ "EM-DAT: The International Disasters Database". Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved 16 July 2015.
  3. ^ "NCEI Significant Earthquake Search". National Centers for Environmental Information. Retrieved 16 July 2015.
  4. ^ Vu, Pamela (Apr 17, 2001). "Lamont Scientists Study India Earthquake Up Close". Columbia News. Retrieved 16 July 2015.
  5. ^ Pathak, Anil; Misra, Leena (Jan 26, 2001). "Monster quake kills over 15,000". The Times of India. Retrieved 16 July 2015.

Effects

[edit]

The text says the quake destryed 'a percent' of Bhuj. BBC World at the time of the quake cited Indian military sources saying 90% of buildings in Bhuj were flattened. Also, the phrase 'The quake destroyed 75% of Kutch' is meaningless as it doesn't follow whether the figure concerns infrastructure, buildings - or even wildlife, arable land etc. I think the text needs revision but I'm no expert on neither India nor earthquakes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhthomsen (talkcontribs) 07:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

7.7 or 8.1?

[edit]

Aceofhearts1968 (talk) 07:12, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Any reason why this happened on the republic day of India in BJP ruled Gujarat which was responsible for causing death and destruction of many people from Non-Hindu communities. Simbelton (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Simbelton, your comment doesn't make any sense. The earthquake occurred in 2001, well before the 2002 riots. 72.83.174.83 (talk) 00:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)Hokie Tech[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:20, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find a replacement so I've just removed the external link. Mikenorton (talk) 16:55, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is a "Collision Margin" ?

[edit]

Somebody needs to research this term found in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.184.248.6 (talk) 11:02, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When I get a moment I will rewrite that section - sorry for the delay, I started looking into it and ended up creating 1819 Rann of Kutch earthquake instead, so I have plenty of sources to work with. Mikenorton (talk) 17:01, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a tectonic setting section from the 1819 earthquake article with some minor tweaks and trimmed down the section in the lead. Comments? Mikenorton (talk) 08:43, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reconstruction

[edit]

Hey, I will be adding a section on the reconstruction that occurred after the earthquake. I plan to add sub sections of housing and city planning.DesertBoy97 (talk) 14:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2001 Gujarat earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]