User talk:Dan East

Hello. Please note: you don't need to write [[tsunami|tsunamis]], since writing [[tsunami]]s makes the whole word, including the final s, appear as a clickable link, and when it is clicked on, it goes to the article whose title appears inside the brackets. Similarly for [[hypen]]ated, [[logic]]al, [[Asia]]n, [[apocrypha]]l, etc. The vertical slash in the middle should be used for things like [[philosophy|philosophies]]. Michael Hardy 23:56, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hello Dan, Thanks for fixing my typos at Glacier, I will use a spell checker from now on :) . I still have a long way to go on that "Glacial" to "Glacier" translation. --JuanPDP 21:02, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

speedy deletion

Heya, thanks for helping out with cleaning up wikipedia! Could you add the speedy deletion tag to articles instead of replacing them with it though? It saves those of us doing the eventual deleting a few clicks. Thanks in advance. --fvw * 07:09, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

Sure thing! I wasn't sure just how "speedily" the articles would be deleted, so I removed what bogus text they contained. I see you guys are on top of things! --Dan East 12:46, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi, thanks for your comment on Hofstad Network. The vandals that add seemingly correct information are the most difficult to root out. I missed it, so good you pointed it out. cheers! Jacoplane 08:54, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Links from Individual Hardy Boys Articles

There is a discussion I referenced you (or you might be interested in) at [1]. --PhilipO 17:00, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

When you are removing the links from those pages, please remove the copyrighted summaries also. Thanks.--FWDixon 11:45, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. I'll remove them from remainder of the articles when they are unlocked, unless you beat me to it. :) --Dan East 17:35, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

use of "circa"

I believe you are using "circa" incorrectly. It is used when the exact date is not known, so "circa 1900" means roughly "between 1895 to 1905". If the month and day are not known circa should not be substituted. Here is the entry in the styleguide:

"Francesco Petrarca or Petrarch (1304 – 1374) was an Italian scholar, poet, and humanist, who is credited with having given the Renaissance its name and inventing the concept of the Dark Ages... "

The years are know exactly just not the day and month. Use of circa would mean the exact year in not know. In the ones you chaned the exact years were known, just not the birth day and month.

Thanks for taking the time to inform me of that! --Dan East 00:37, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Book Title in Italics

Actually, my bad! Although I meant italics and put the book title in italics, my brain apparently locked up when I typed the edit summary. -- DS1953 04:21, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:{{unreferenced}}

If external links are in fact references, they should be labeled them as such, as they are not the same thing. I have been following the (Wikipedia:Cite_sources#External_links.2FFurther_reading which states clearly that ==External links== or ==Further reading== section is placed after the references section, and offers books, articles, and links to websites related to the topic that might be of interest to the reader, but which have not been used as sources for the article. Thus if article has only elinks or further reading, it has no references, and this template should be added. To fix it, please move the appopriate links from elink section to reference section, and it would help if you would link them via Wikipedia:Footnotes to the relevant facts int he article. One of the most common critique of Wiki is that our articles have no references. Please see also the Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check and [[Wikipedia:Forum for Encyclopedic Standards]. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 04:58, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What other template you'd suggest then, instead? Without reviewing the elinks it is hard to know if they are in fact references or not. Given the choice of spending an hour (or more) reading the related pages myself versus flagging the article and hoping its original contributors will notice and fix the problem much quicker, I opt for the second version.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 05:11, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for the link repair work on Condensed Detachment. Nahaj 18:16, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

John Mark Karr

Why changed "raped" to "possibly sexually abused"? He's admitted sex with JonBenet, and sex with a minor is statutory rape whether it was consensual or not. wikipediatrix 13:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because the physical evidence from the coroner does not indicate rape. At this point we have to assume that Karr's world is one of fiction, not fact. Thus we cannot say that JonBenét was raped based on Karr's statements - at least not until he's proven guilty. Take a look at the JonBenét Ramsey article - you will not find the word "rape" anywhere in that article. It states "The results of the autopsy revealed that ... she may have been sexually assaulted." --Dan East 14:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Mark Karr article

Thanks for being thorough, and discovering that the text was indeed supported by the source. I don't know if I could have made myself add that back in another time. ;) --Dan East 14:01, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, sorry if I caused you extra work/time. I am on a mission to try to get material sourced and referenced if its going to be included on this project. Cheers! --Tom 14:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A request for assistance

Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).

Replaceable fair use Image:Neptec_LCS.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Neptec_LCS.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 22:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox: {{User:Tcrow777/templates/wiki user since}}

I see that your using one of my custom userboxes, I think it looks great on your userpage. Tcrow777 talk 22:17, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making the template! --Dan East 04:01, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Blackbeard photo

Apparently someone added that part about the Pirates of the Caribbean. I never put that caption in. Probably a prankster. I'll change it back. Thanks for the notice.

--Mactographer 08:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wording of GNL

Dan, thanks for the change, but it shows that the MOS version needs tweaking. Tony 11:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Neptec LCS Visualization.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Neptec LCS Visualization.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Portage Trail Conference

An article that you have been involved in editing, Portage Trail Conference, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pioneer Conference. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? §hep • ¡Talk to me! 01:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Continuation of discussion over notability of Ohio high school sports conferences

Hello. You are receiving this message because you recently participated in an AfD discussion regarding the notability of high school sports conferences in Ohio State. While the AfD has been closed as no consensus, the discussion is continuing here. You are invited to participate. Thank you. --Jaysweet (talk) 20:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Webinar / edit-a-thon at the National Library of Medicine (NLM)

Join us at the NLM next week, either in person or online, to learn about NLM resources, hear some great speakers, and do some editing!

On Tuesday, 28 May there will be a community Wikipedia meeting at the United States National Library of Medicine in Bethesda, Maryland - with a second on Thursday, 30 May for those who can't make it on Tuesday. You can participate either in-person, or via an online webinar. If you attend in person, USB sticks (but not external drives) are ok to use.

Please go to the event page to get more information, including a detailed program schedule.

If you are interested in participating, please register by sending an email to pmhmeet@gmail.com. Please indicate if you are coming in person or if you will be joining us via the webinar. After registering, you will receive additional information about how to get to our campus (if coming in-person) and details about how to join the webinar. Klortho (talk) 05:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have time on Saturday?

I'm sorry for the last-minute notice, but on Saturday, June 8, from 3 to 6 PM, Wikimedia DC and the Cato Institute are hosting a Legislative Data Meetup. We will discuss the work done so far by WikiProject U.S. Federal Government Legislative Data to put data from Congress onto Wikipedia, as well as what more needs to be done. If you have ideas you'd like to contribute, or if you're just curious and feel like meeting up with other Wikipedians, you are welcome to come! Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.

I hope to see you there!

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for D.C.-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Harej (talk) 04:40, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, June 15!

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, June 15 at 5:30 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill ^[talk] 20:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Join us this Sunday for the Great American Wiknic!

	Great American Wiknic DC at Meridian Hill Park
	You are invited to the Great American Wiknic DC at the James Buchanan Memorial at Meridian Hill Park. We would love to see you there, so sign up and bring something fun for the potluck! :)

Boilerplate message generously borrowed from Wikimedia NYC. To unsubscribe from future DC area event notifications, remove your name from this list.

Harej (talk) 16:04, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, July 13!

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, July 13 at 6:00 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill ^[talk] 00:46, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're Invited: Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon at the Smithsonian

File:SAAM facade.jpg

American Art Museum

Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon at the
Smithsonian American Art Museum

You're invited to the Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon, part of a series of edit-a-thons organized by the Smithsonian American Art Museum to add and expand articles about American art and artists on Wikipedia.

This event will include a catered lunch and special tours of the Luce Foundation Center for American Art and the Lunder Conservation Center at the Smithsonian American Art Museum.

9:15 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. on Friday, July 19, 2013
Smithsonian American Art Museum
Meet at G Street Lobby (9th St. & G St. NW, Washington, D.C.)

Capacity is limited, so please sign up today!

If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from our distribution list.
Message delivered by Dominic·t 00:00, 12 July 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Luce Foundation Center

Re: Reverted edit

Hello. You have a new message at PartTimeGnome's talk page. – PartTimeGnome (talk | contribs) 21:07, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Cwobeel (talk) 14:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dan East. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dan East. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dan East. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dan East. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]