Talk:The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog

Missing a letter?

The quick brown fox jumps over "a" lazy dog. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:1302:203A:3058:F870:1C27:7531 (talk) 02:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Lazy. DreamGuy (talk) 14:56, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Missing "v" and "w" init? 206.47.215.34 (talk) 19:45, 15 December 2015 (UTC) JDL

Brown, and over. 𝒶𝓎𝒶𝓃𝓮_𝓂^{💬 • ✏} 22:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Missing “c”? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:B23B:6D20:2841:D304:8668:FB92 (talk) 21:25, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

"quick" has a "c".

I do agree that it should be either "the, a" or "a, the", not the inefficient "the, the". 2601:546:C300:8FF0:7CE4:BA81:92DF:EF43 (talk) 05:25, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Where is the "V" is this sentence? This one is missing.. 2A02:A461:5636:1:F861:A793:35D2:A3FA (talk) 10:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

It's the second letter of the word "over". --Belbury (talk) 10:42, 24 February 2023

it's missing "S" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.224.29.4 (talk • contribs)

jump*s* Q ^{T C} 19:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Alphabet locator

This chart provides a quick reference of the word in which each letter of the alphabet occurs. Though it is clear that all letters of the alphabet exist in the sentence, this chart is an aid to readers who may need help finding a few letters:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandenads (talk • contribs) 06:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

If you're suggesting adding this to the article, I don't think a nine-word sentence needs an index. --Lord Belbury (talk) 20:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

You wouldn't think so, but there have been dozens of times that people have edited this article saying that it lacks one letter or another. It's weird. Maybe this chart would help. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 01:41, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

I assume these edits are jokes. Or at least made with such hurried and misplaced confidence — no time to double-check each of these nine words, the 100-year-old typing exercise must be wrong and I must be right! — that they wouldn't read as far as a quick reference table either. Belbury (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Earliest known use history

Just for future reference, the following edits show some of the progression of the earlier known use as given in this article:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_quick_brown_fox_jumps_over_the_lazy_dog&diff=prev&oldid=330700353

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_quick_brown_fox_jumps_over_the_lazy_dog&diff=prev&oldid=748378117

The Michigan School Moderator text was being sampled by some Inkscape tutorials which lead me down this rabbit hole. Looks like Kaldari is the world's expert on this. ;-) Jason Quinn (talk) 04:26, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

I chased down the Boston Journal reference on microfilm. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Boston_Journal_1885-02-10_(first_page_only).png (and the related discussion on the 1st talk archive page, where an IP editor claims the article on the 10th was a reprint of a column printed on the 9th). C. Scott Ananian (he/him) (talk) 18:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Color pictures of the pangram.

Here are some color pictures of the Quick Brown Fox pangram:

A fox jumps over a dog, in this colorized adaptation of a picture from Scouting for Boys

File:FoxJumpingDog.PNG

A fox jumps over a dog, illustrating the pangram "A quick brown fox jumps over a lazy dog."

Brandenads (talk) 17:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

References

Fine little illustrations but they're unnecessary for this article - the b&w drawing the article currently has is there for historic reasons, not just as a picture. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 17:37, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

I agree that original historical context is more useful. The second image has also been deleted from Commons as a possible clipart copyvio. --Lord Belbury (talk) 13:24, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Variant

As a child decades ago, I'd always seen this phrased as "The quick RED fox jumps over the lazy brown dog." Less efficient, but since foxes tend to be reddish, not brown, it always made more sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.11.4.37 (talk) 21:23, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Other pangrams

The subsection with this name proceeds to detail not merely other pangrams, but specifically shorter ones; which isn't really a relevant qualification for a pangram. What is more, the only pangram included which features the words sphinx and quartz is not the one more commonly found on font websites (specifically those offering free fonts), which by contradistinction is:

Jackdaws love my big sphinx of quartz Nuttyskin (talk) 12:36, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Entire storyline?

I saw a version of this used as a Lorem Ipsem alternative, except that it just goes on. Does anyone know what this version is called? 67.42.151.58 (talk) 21:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)