Talk:Emasculation

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Men's Issues

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Men's Issues, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Men's Issues articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Men's IssuesWikipedia:WikiProject Men's IssuesTemplate:WikiProject Men's IssuesMen's Issues articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Anatomy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular anatomical discipline.

warriors/humiliation???

I moved this from the article to here. There is no context, and no references, nothing. It is meaningless as it stands.--24.85.68.231 (talk) 03:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Historically, it has been reported that armies emasculated enemy warriors to humiliate them, to seize their power and to make it impossible for them to reproduce. Often foreskins, penises, scrotums or all were collected to count the dead after battles.

The reference is to the First Book of Samuel, where, to earn the hand of his daughter and become next in line for the throne, Saul assigns David the task of bringing him the foreskins of 100 Pharisees. Saul did not think they would be handed over on request, but he did not foresee that David would avail himself of his own private army to complete the task. Said foreskins were collected and duly counted out in front of the astonished Saul. Dave of Maryland (talk) 21:26, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probably at least as much a way of ensuring that the people you are claiming to have killed are actually dead ... no way anyone's going to let you cut their junk off otherwise (and even if they do, they're not going to be alive much longer). 62.196.17.197 (talk) 10:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Castration?

The Castration article is much better developed. Anniepoo (talk) 01:46, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposal: with Masculinity and/or Castration

Merger proposal

I propose that Emasculation be split and merged into Masculinity and Castration. I think that the content in this article can easily be explained in the context of both the articles on Masculinity and Castration because it would likely remove ambiguity and supply the sources that Emasculation is lacking. Houdinipeter (talk) 15:54, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I second this merger. The definition being attempted here is for the word Demasculation - to take away the masculinity from (sex) and Emasculation deals more with gender and power and "procreative power" (like "fixing" a male animal, there is no loss of penis) Emasculation can be entirely mental. Demasculation is [usually] on a physical level. Maybe this is all Newspeak I have learned. Let's stick with castration and masculinity pages, and add all the fluff there including Emasculate, Demasculate, Unmasculate (obsolete), Unmasculine. In Judges 9:54 is a great example of Emasculation without castration. Abimelech fears that they will say a woman killed him (because it's true) and calls for his armor bearer to kill him quickly. I second the merger because Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and even if it was, it would be an incorrect entry/usage of "emasculate" Wcichello (talk) 12:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

I think it would be more effective to change the referencing style to a Notes / References type arrangement, because at the moment there’s a bit of a jumble of shortened citations and full citations.

What do you guys think?

I’m not too sure how to go about adding a notes section though. Lorenchakerian (talk) 06:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV issues in Hijra section?

Parts of the subheading on Hijra imply belief in certain religious/traditional beliefs (I am not very familiar, but the text does seem to be written that way). If no one objects I will reword some sentences. I5-X600K (talk) 15:54, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m very new to Wiki writing so I may be misunderstanding, but the emasculation process for many Hijra is inherently religious, at it confers upon them significant ritual/spiritual benefits. I definitely don’t object to the wording being changed if it’s not a NPOV, but just wanted to explain what I was trying to communicate :) Pineappleexpressbear (talk) 12:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]