Purkinje effect
The Purkinje effect or Purkinje phenomenon (Czech: [ˈpurkɪɲɛ] ; sometimes called the Purkinje shift, often pronounced /pərˈkɪndʒi/)[1] is the tendency for the peak luminance sensitivity of the eye to shift toward the blue end of the color spectrum at low illumination levels as part of dark adaptation.[2][3][page needed] In consequence, reds will appear darker relative to other colors as light levels decrease.[4] The effect is named after the Czech anatomist Jan Evangelista Purkyně. While the effect is often described from the perspective of the human eye, it is well established in a number of animals under the same name to describe the general shifting of spectral sensitivity due to pooling of rod and cone output signals as a part of dark/light adaptation.[5][6][7][8]
This effect introduces a difference in color contrast under different levels of illumination. For instance, in bright sunlight, geranium flowers appear bright red against the dull green of their leaves, or adjacent blue flowers, but in the same scene viewed at dusk, the contrast is reversed, with the red petals appearing a dark red or black, and the leaves and blue petals appearing relatively bright.
The sensitivity to light in scotopic vision varies with wavelength, though the perception is essentially black-and-white. The Purkinje shift is the relation between the absorption maximum of rhodopsin, reaching a maximum at about 500 nanometres (2.0×10−5 in), and that of the opsins in the longer-wavelength cones that dominate in photopic vision, about 555 nanometres (2.19×10−5 in) (green).[9]
In visual astronomy, the Purkinje shift can affect visual estimates of variable stars when using comparison stars of different colors, especially if one of the stars is red.[10]
Physiology
[edit]The Purkinje effect occurs at the transition between primary use of the photopic (cone-based) and scotopic (rod-based) systems, that is, in the mesopic state: as intensity dims, the rods take over, and before color disappears completely, it shifts towards the rods' top sensitivity.[11]
The effect occurs because in mesopic conditions the outputs of cones in the retina, which are generally responsible for the perception of color in daylight, are pooled with outputs of rods which are more sensitive under those conditions and have peak sensitivity in blue-green wavelength of 507 nm.
Use of red lights
[edit]The insensitivity of rods to long-wavelength (i.e. red) light has led to the use of red lights under certain special circumstances—for example, in the control rooms of submarines, in research laboratories, aircraft, and in naked-eye astronomy.[12]
Red lights are used in conditions where it is desirable to activate both the photopic and scotopic systems. Submarines are well lit to facilitate the vision of the crew members working there, but the control room must be lit differently to allow crew members to read instrument panels yet remain dark adjusted. By using red lights or wearing red goggles (called "dark adaptor goggles"), the cones can receive enough light to provide photopic vision (namely the high-acuity vision required for reading). The rods are not saturated by the bright red light because they are not sensitive to long-wavelength light, so the crew members remain dark adapted.[13] Similarly, airplane cockpits use red lights so pilots can read their instruments and maps while maintaining night vision to see outside the aircraft.
Red lights are also often used in research settings. Many research animals (such as rats and mice) have limited photopic vision, as they have far fewer cone photoreceptors.[14] The animal subjects do not perceive red lights and thus experience darkness (the active period for nocturnal animals), but the human researchers, who have one kind of cone (the "L cone") that is sensitive to long wavelengths, are able to read instruments or perform procedures that would be impractical even with fully dark adapted (but low acuity) scotopic vision.[15] For the same reason, zoo displays of nocturnal animals often are illuminated with red light.
History
[edit]The effect was discovered in 1819 by Jan Evangelista Purkyně. Purkyně was a polymath[16] who would often meditate at dawn during long walks in the blossomed Bohemian fields. Purkyně noticed that his favorite flowers appeared bright red on a sunny afternoon, while at dawn they looked very dark. He reasoned that the eye has not one but two systems adapted to see colors, one for bright overall light intensity, and the other for dusk and dawn.
Purkyně wrote in his Neue Beiträge:[16][17]
Objectively, the degree of illumination has a great influence on the intensity of color quality. In order to prove this most vividly, take some colors before daybreak, when it begins slowly to get lighter. Initially one sees only black and grey. Particularly the brightest colors, red and green, appear darkest. Yellow cannot be distinguished from a rosy red. Blue became noticeable to me first. Nuances of red, which otherwise burn brightest in daylight, namely carmine, cinnabar and orange, show themselves as darkest for quite a while, in contrast to their average brightness. Green appears more bluish to me, and its yellow tint develops with increasing daylight only.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "Purkinje cell". Dictionary.com Unabridged (Online). n.d.
- ^ Frisby JP (1980). Seeing: Illusion, Brain and Mind. Oxford University Press : Oxford.
- ^ Purkinje JE (1825). Neue Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Sehens in Subjectiver Hinsicht. Reimer : Berlin. pp. 109–110.
- ^ Mitsuo Ikeda, Chian Ching Huang & Shoko Ashizawa: Equivalent lightness of colored objects at illuminances from the scotopic to the photopic level
- ^ Dodt, E. (July 1967). "Purkinje-shift in the rod eye of the bush-baby, Galago crassicaudatus". Vision Research. 7 (7–8): 509–517. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(67)90060-0. PMID 5608647.
- ^ Silver, Priscilla H. (1 October 1966). "A Purkinje shift in the spectral sensitivity of grey squirrels". The Journal of Physiology. 186 (2): 439–450. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008045. PMC 1395858. PMID 5972118.
- ^ Armington, John C.; Thiede, Frederick C. (August 1956). "Electroretinal Demonstration of a Purkinje Shift in the Chicken Eye". American Journal of Physiology. Legacy Content. 186 (2): 258–262. doi:10.1152/ajplegacy.1956.186.2.258. PMID 13362518.
- ^ Hammond, P.; James, C. R. (1 July 1971). "The Purkinje shift in cat: extent of the mesopic range". The Journal of Physiology. 216 (1): 99–109. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009511. PMC 1331962. PMID 4934210.
- ^ "Eye, human." Encyclopædia Britannica 2006 Ultimate Reference Suite DVD
- ^ Sidgwick, John Benson; Gamble, R. C. (1980). Amateur Astronomer's Handbook. Courier Corporation. p. 429. ISBN 9780486240343.
- ^ "Human eye – anatomy". Britannica online. Archived from the original on 2015-05-03. Retrieved 2011-06-09.
The Purkinje shift has an interesting psychophysical correlate; it may be observed, as evening draws on, that the luminosities of different colours of flowers in a garden change; the reds become much darker or black, while the blues become much brighter. What is happening is that, in this range of luminosities, called mesopic, both rods and cones are responding, and, as the rod responses become more pronounced – i.e., as darkness increases – the rod luminosity scale prevails over that of the cones.
- ^ Barbara Fritchman Thompson (2005). Astronomy Hacks: Tips and Tools for Observing the Night Sky. O'Reilly. pp. 82–86. ISBN 978-0-596-10060-5.
- ^ "On the Prowl with Polaris". Popular Science. 181 (3): 59–61. September 1962. ISSN 0161-7370.
- ^ Jeon et al. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 8936
- ^ James G. Fox; Stephen W. Barthold; Muriel T. Davisson; Christian E. Newcomer (2007). The mouse in biomedical research: Normative Biology, Husbandry, and Models. Academic Press. p. 291. ISBN 978-0-12-369457-7.
- ^ a b Nicholas J. Wade; Josef Brožek (2001). Purkinje's Vision. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 13. ISBN 978-0-8058-3642-4.
- ^ As quoted in: Grace Maxwell Fernald (1909). "The Effect of Achromatic Conditions on the Color Phenomena of Peripheral Vision". Psychological Monograph Supplements. X (3). Baltimore : The Review Publishing Company: 9.