Talk:Esuvee
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
from Vfd
[edit]On 5 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Esuvee for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 16:10, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)
links do not work
[edit]both esuvee links did not work for me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.166.83 (talk) 01:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
answer to above question,
[edit]as said in page, the site that it links to is down indefenately sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.47.152.2 (talk) 13:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Mistaken AfD and removed speedy tag
[edit]In the course of speedy deletion patrol, I came across a version of this article that had been (a) rendered meaningless by the removal of all sensible content by an IP editor, then (b) tagged for speedy deletion by an editor with whom I completely agreed. I deleted the page, then was about to delete the talk page when I noted that the article had already passed AfD in 2005. In a brief moment of complete ineptitude, I nominated the article for AfD a second time -- then I looked deeper into it and restored an earlier version of the article that made sense (based on the supporting material I found via Google), so I reversed my AfD and removed all trace of its presence. Yes, I feel like an idiot. However, I think we have a useful and sensible article now. If anyone wants to point out a process whereby I could have reversed the AfD more easily, I would be happy to hear it; I just hope I haven't caused anyone but me any extra trouble. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)