Talk:Tevita Momoedonu

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Fiji Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fiji, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fiji on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FijiWikipedia:WikiProject FijiTemplate:WikiProject FijiFiji articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Tevita Momoedonu was not appointed because of nepotism - he was appointed because he was the only Labour MP willing to go along with the legal end run.

The fact that he was willing to do so probably does have something to do with the relationship between himself and Tui Vuda. Being a respectful nephew and doing what his uncle says was probably a big factor in his decision. This however is not nepotism - or the favoring relatives or personal friends because of their relationship rather than because of their abilities.

Had thier been a whole bunch of Labour MP's rushing to sign up to be PM for a day then we could discuss the possibility of nepotsism.

Just because a bunch of FLP hacks are clutching at straws on the web doesn't mean we should repeat it, especially when the accusation fundamentally doesn't make sense. --Xorkl000 02:23, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you here. I'm simply REPORTING what these cynics said - I'm not saying for one moment that I AGREE with it. The NPOV policy of wikipedia, if I understand it correctly, requires us to report people's viewpoints without adding our own views. Personally, I felt that what these guys were saying was just sour grapes, but that they said it is a fact which should be stated, I think. But I think we should perhaps reword it a bit to make it clear that this was not an objective fact but an opinion expressed by his opponents, who cannot be expected to be fair-minded. David Cannon 06:15, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tevita Momoedonu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]