Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hair/archive1
Recently I found hair interesting (after linking an article to it). The article satisfied that interest and so I think it's suitable for inclusion in this category. I believe its faults, if any, are minor and can be taken care of quickly for this article to make the grade. - RoyBoy 800 07:16, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose No references, jguk 09:39, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose, the article should have a summary section on hair cuts, strength of hair and hair color, instead of just a few external links. Mgm|(talk) 10:31, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose until references: I think it's an excellent article otherwise. The article maintains a scientific and dispassionate tone and avoids getting into a fixation on head hair, so I appreciate the fact that puts all the haircut stuff in the See also section. However, there must be references. One of the authors must have used medical texts; these should be listed. Geogre 13:33, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. In agreement with Geogre, there must be citations for this article; otherwise it should not be featured. Courtland 18:23, 2005 Mar 25 (UTC)
- Object, although I like the article, as it has been said I'd love to see references added, besides from external links. -- Shauri 00:27, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)