Talk:DragonFly BSD

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the DragonFly BSD article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 91 days

DragonFly BSD has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 20, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Amiga / Software / Free and open-source software Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Amiga (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as High-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Amiga with:

Tagging
- Tagging Amiga related articles into the project by adding the template
  {{WikiProject Computing|class=|importance=|amiga=yes|amiga-importance=}}
- Tagging Amiga related articles into relevant categories, for example adding
  [[Category:Amiga software]]
- Tagging Amiga related articles with a relevant Link template for easier navigation of a given topic, e. g.
  {{AmigaOS 4}}
Articles
- Improving the accuracy and updating dates about events
- Improving the clarity and the quality of articles
- Articles of high-importance that needs expanding or improvements:
  - AmigaOS versions (missing dates etc)
  - Workbench (AmigaOS)
Expanding articles
- Expanding Stub articles and Start articles
Creating/Expanding missing articles
- Companies: Amiga Technologies, Haage & Partner, Eyetech
- Software: AmiDock, JXFS (filesystem), ~~Hollywood (programming language)~~, Warp3D
- Hardware:
  - Phase5 accelerator boards; the 1230/1240/1260 blizzards and the PPC boards.
  - Computers (expanding): AmigaOne SE, AmigaOne XE, AmigaOne Micro-A1, ~~DraCo~~, The Access
  - Hardware prototypes: Amiga Multimedia Convergence Computer
  - Other: ~~Denise (computer chip)~~, ~~Paula (computer chip)~~, ~~Copper (OCS)~~, Alice (computer chip), Lisa (computer chip), Mediator PCI, Clock port
Images
- Uploading legal missing Amiga related images/screenshots.

Clarification

@Bkouhi: I have hard time clarifying DragonFly BSD §§ Virtual kernel, HAMMER file system, and Application snapshots, as the text appears to be already very clear to me. Probably you could request clairification here, so that I could understand, what exactly seems unclear to you. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 07:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for clarification, I removed those "clarification needed" tags, the text now looks smooth and clear to me, as you said, "Virtual kernel" and "Application snapshots" sections are already clear and I think HAMMER's docs clearly describes what "configurable file system history" means. Thank you very much. -- Bkouhi (talk) 09:54, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TCP SACK?!?

One of the feature listed for 1.2 is "TCP SACK" -- something I've never heard of, so I wonder if that's just a misspelled "STACK". 76.147.42.136 (talk) 04:07, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it's not a misspelling of "STACK", it's short for selective acknowledgement. Guy Harris (talk) 05:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Release history is backwards

Release history contains a table and a graphical timeline down the left border. In the state that the article loads as, the contents of this table are all backwards such that when reading down the page the earliest row encountered describes the latest version released and the latest row encountered describes the earliest version released. This looks absolutely extraordinary. The column headers can be clicked to sort and clicking Date does sort the table into chronological order but the graphical timeline to the left remains backwards and becomes desynchronised from the contents of the table. Just in case I was missing some emerging trend in right-to-left or bottom-to-top text flow I went ahead and checked:

and every one of these begins with the original version and concludes with the current version (the same way a log file or a book flows), while this article begins with the current version and concludes with the original version. I find this bizarre but there may be a legitimate reason for it -- perhaps linked with the graphical timeline. I would like to reorder the table for accessibility and consistency reasons. I'll leave it a couple of weeks to hear why it has developed this way in this specific article. 165.228.217.140 (talk) 23:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]