User talk:203.109.254.40

Attention:

This IP address, 203.109.254.40, is registered to IHUG Limited, an Internet service provider through which thousands of individual users may connect to the internet. This IP may be randomly assigned to a different person when the current user disconnects. Warnings or messages left on this page may not be received by the intended user. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

Proposed deletion of Development criticism

The article Development criticism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks more like a category or stand-alone list than an article. Even then, both the subject and inclusion criteria are unclear. If this refers to a particular field of study, most of the names on the list do not belong. If it refers to a particular outlook on technology, we already have Critique of technology and Neo-luddism among several others. "Development" as a subject for criticism has many more meanings than "technological development," which is either (a) vague, (b) value-laden, or (c) duplicitous of a better defined subject. The disambiguation page for "Development" lists no form of "development" that fits with the general "technological" subject of this page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:28, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Useragent listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Useragent. Since you had some involvement with the Useragent redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 08:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Skirt and dress listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Skirt and dress. Since you had some involvement with the Skirt and dress redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

"Evercrack" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Evercrack. Since you had some involvement with the Evercrack redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 10:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

---