Talk:Great Barrington, Massachusetts

Great Barrington, Massachusetts was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 27, 2012	Good article nominee	Not listed

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

United States: Massachusetts Start‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

Early discussion

As a GB resident there was a lot info on this page that was chatty or poorly summarized. I tried to update nightlife/entertainment info but will make a more comprehensive review later. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nothumb (talk • contribs)

Were you posting as 65.118.139.246? --AJD 23:14, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Ga, this article is not an encyclopedia article... john k 23:58, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Agreed. I'll determine if the sushi is good at a particular restaurant if I eat there. Alas, I do not eat sushi and have never been in this town, so making a large edit to the troublesome "Food and Entertainment" section seems inappropriate. So I added the NPOV tag. --Tothebarricades.tk 03:09, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

When I visited, I was surprised by the sheer number of sushi and hibachi places, though I only ate at one.--Eion 11:57, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page needs to be made neutral. It's a bit more celebratory than factual. It is a fine town, but opinions here are a little too prevalent in the text.Woodson 02:53, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

Images

Why are all of the images of historical nature? why are there no contemporary photos of how the town looks today? ROxBo (talk) 12:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Government

I was looking at this page randomly and saw that they state that Paul Kirk is the junior senator when it is Scott Brown. I went ahead and changed it and then one of the Wikipedia admins sent me a message saying my changes were undocumented and changed it back!!! I don't understand why the heck you would put something that is false. I was clearly just changing what was wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.195.55.113 (talk) 19:32, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was the one that reverted your edit. Sorry if the information you added was correct, but as you did not cite any reliable sources, I assumed that it was political vandalism. Guoguo12 --Talk-- 19:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Great Barrington, Massachusetts/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TheSpecialUser (talk · contribs) 10:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I fear, I've to quickly fail this. I'm sorry but this article is not near to GA status and issues can't be fixed within a month or some so failing it. Here is an brief explanation of the problems:

Refs - Majority of them are WP:Bare URLs and some are unreliable sources which makes this eligible for a quick fail
Unref - Large amounts of facts are unreferenced and needs WP:RS using WP:Citing sources
Lead - per WP:LEAD, it should summarize the article and should be neutral which it is not
Neutrality - There are WP:PEACOCK terms in the article as well as few statements are not neutral.
Images - They look awkward and caption needs to improved as well as needs WP:ALT
MoS - There are many small paras and in the way they are, are not proper. The structure of the article is little too poor
Incomplete - There is a lot of info that can be added to the topic thus this is an incomplete article
Phrase - It needs throughout copyediting.

TheSpecialUser ^TSU 07:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Barrington, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov/ to http://factfinder2.census.gov/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Barrington, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120307131126/http://www.wwlp.com/dpp/news/local/wwlp_local_great_barrington_tornado_14_years_later_200905281710 to http://www.wwlp.com/dpp/news/local/wwlp_local_great_barrington_tornado_14_years_later_200905281710

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]