Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Requests for investigation/Archives/2004/12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Current alerts

December 31

172.152.238.96

64.230.163.177

24.7.179.169

64.230.163.177

69.198.189.159

172.166.77.131

172.166.77.131 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) has vandalized this page and others.

Unknown IP

An as yet unidentified user is probably unintentionally vandalising Humanitarian response to the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake. Often I see it has had sections duplicated, added, removed or moved around. Can an admin please investigate and warn the user responsible? Nicholas 15:34, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • Are you sure it's a vandal? The has been under very heavy editing for some time now. Mistakes are easy to make while resolving edit conflicts. --fvw* 16:00, 2004 Dec 31 (UTC)

December 30

24.19.152.87

  • Blocked for 24 hours.-gadfium 06:30, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

82.139.65.138

203.128.5.110

  • Vicious racist stuff in Pashtun and elsewhere. Apparently not the only person at this IP, because there have been decent edits in the past. -- Jmabel | Talk 22:47, Dec 30, 2004 (UTC)
  • Which decent edits are these? The addition to the gay/lesbian list seems to be spurioous -- there's no mention anywhere on the web of a person by this name (last April); another is just a cut and paste from [[1]]. Bad'un. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 23:02, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

24.7.179.169

  • This user vandalize with Poland related articles.--Emax 22:25, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

68.78.135.106

  • User continues to vandalize the Neowin Entry, Reverting to the vandalized version after Its been reverted to the correct version, have requested this page is protected for now, mainly because 68.78.135.106 is not the only vandal on this page, due to the article being posted on the neowin forums, to which forum readers are taking great delight in vandlising the said page.----
  • Blocked for 24 hours for violation of the 3RR. It looks to me that some of the anons have made useful edits to the article, so I'm not sure if protecting it is a good idea.-gadfium 03:08, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)


64.28.62.8

  • Seems to be adding spam links all over the place,.--Pharos 20:00, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

65.202.185.20

  • ( 65.202.185.20 | talk | contributions)
    • Created a nonsense article called "Gooberhead". The only content is "See Misty", so it seems to be a personal attack of some kind. Oklonia 22:50, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
      • Looks like a newbie test, not vandalism. I've speedy deleted it, and put a welcome message on the user's talk page.-gadfium 23:02, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

71.0.32.99

  • ( 71.0.32.99 | talk | contributions)
    • Made a nonsense page called "Derek allen" and it just says "is here". Oklonia 23:07, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
      • This appears to be just another newbie test. Please read Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. The appropriate thing to do in this case is to put a {{del}} on the page they've created, and to put a friendly message on their talk page. {{test}} is the standard friendly message, but feel free to write your own if you want to.-gadfium 23:15, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

December 29

64.119.79.254

  • (64.119.79.254 | talk | contributions)
    • Keeps vandalizing articles related to Donkey Kong. I've warned him twice so far but it doesn't look like he's stopping. If he continues I'm going to temp block. PMC 23:07, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

66.11.165.56

This user is continuing to delete the Vfd header. --OntarioQuizzer 23:17, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Blocked for 24 hours.-gadfium 23:28, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

200.204.177.230

Emax

  • Vandalizing and violating 3RR on the article Battle of Orsha. This user is repeatedly deleting large amounts of properly referenced material without discussion or explanation. Please help. --Ghirlandajo
I'm only remove your funny "soviet history" edits. P.S. you reverted 4 times today.--Emax 19:15, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I didn't revert but added new info 2 out of 4 times. I posted much new material putting the article into a historical perspective (from the Battle of Vedrosha to the peace treaty ending the war). I also corrected spelling and factual mistakes, as well as pointed to the lack of reliability in this russophobic article. You have added nothing, just keep deleting all additions and corrections wholesale. ----Ghirlandajo
I've warned both Emax and Ghirlandajo about the 3RR. I'll block either of them if they revert again within 24 hours of 3 previous reverts.-gadfium 21:07, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

202.83.33.45

The only thing this user is doing is adding links to his own website ("technotip.com") , a site which seems to be composed entirely of content ripped directly from other pages - this is probably to get google ad revenue. Ground

83.17.51.138

64.18.111.141


24.225.129.138

  • Has blanked VfDs against his pages, removed copyvio notices against his pages etc. --BesigedB 00:18, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

December 28

166.68.134.175

  • Has been vandalizing pages in a desultory fashion since October. Was warned October 28 and has vandalized half a dozen since then. Tualha 23:38, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

66.191.165.51

  • Now blocked. -- The Anome 21:02, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)

166.50.78.54

Vsaint

Ghirlandajo

66.172.225.142

143.50.61.66

  • ( 143.50.61.66 | 143.50.61.66 | contributions) Repeat vandal by content removal, and sneaky vandalism (see below for Dec. 14th and 17th reports). Has been warned in numerous occasions via e-mail and Blog. He should be blocked.--Afshar 14:17, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

220.245.194.103

  • Vandalised content by introducing incorrect telephone numbers and information to topic "2004_Indian_Ocean_earthquake_in_India". I am newto Wikipedia, please advise, I like to keep the content squeaky clean.

68.21.4.80

Jesus spammer, again

68.21.182.128

66.72.100.60

Proudly vandalising this page, again with religious slogans and picture. --Henrygb 02:02, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

68.21.168.146

A series of religious slogans vandalising articles. Perhaps 68.21.182.74 blocked below. --Henrygb 01:45, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

172.139.60.35

Another penis picture poster. I fear the premise of Meta:Friends of gays should not be allowed to edit articles doesn't hold… --fvw* 00:34, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)

219.196.232.197

219.196.232.197 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

December 27

66.74.128.162

  • Warned again, and rolled back the edits. I'll block if the user continues.-gadfium 23:30, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

198.26.120.12

  • Blocked for 24 hours.-gadfium 23:16, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Bobchalk

  • Insists on splitting up the article 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake despite opposition from multiple other posters and support from no one but himself. This is a current-news article, and so cannot be temporarily frozen from editing. He persists in conducting a single-handed edit war, and should perhaps be blocked. -- Curps 22:40, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Blocked for 24 hours for multiple time violations of the three-revert rule. David Newton 23:02, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

68.21.182.74

68.231.134.110

Added a website regarding gay male porn movies to Film, Gay, and repeatedly despite reverts to List of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender-related films. Hyacinth 20:55, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Suspected to be 65.125.117.182. Hyacinth 21:08, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

62.219.229.18

213.142.136.4

  • Spamming several Wikipedia: namespace pages and User talk: pages with links to nude celeb sites. -- Michael Warren | Talk 17:33, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Blocked by Jayjg for 24 hours.-gadfium 18:04, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

User:Netoholic

not vandalism. dab (ᛏ) 17:28, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Seems to have stopped revert warring. Vacuum c 17:36, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/User:Amgine/Maureen's RfC. Deco 04:18, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

165.21.154.12

  • Not a newbie anymore, long overdue--Jondel 13:03, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

82.36.188.4

  • vandalized multiple pages on various cars and is trying to slander a particular reporter. Lostchicken 08:17, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

202.138.120.37

202.138.120.37 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

  • Blanking out articles. --kunjan1029 07:27, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
    • Blocked for 24 hours.-gadfium 07:48, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

68.37.51.161

68.37.51.161 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

172.166.166.226

172.166.166.226 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

  • Had some fun in the sandbox and then started to vandalize other pages, including user pages.
    • This IP was blocked (for 24 hours) almost simultaneously by two admins. SWAdair | Talk 07:46, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

68.21.181.173

68.21.181.173 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

  • Same religion-related vandalism noted earlier.
    • Blocked for 24 hours by Golbez. SWAdair | Talk 07:49, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

66.72.96.238

66.72.96.238 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

December 26

213.92.99.73

213.92.99.73 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

  • Same from this IP number - MPF 20:54, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

64.124.92.199

64.124.92.199 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

  • Continuous addition of a pseudoscience website to 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake - MPF 20:50, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Still at it - request urgent block of this IP number and the next one mentioned above - MPF 22:06, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • I've warned the user. I won't block someone for inserting a somewhat relevant but low-quality link without a warning.-gadfium 22:18, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

218.103.151.73

218.103.151.73 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

  • Continuous insertion of nonsense regarding Jimmy Carter and cheerleaders. Warned. Antandrus 17:37, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Note, it's probably the same person as the next entry (219.77.77.242) since they're both obsessed with Jimmy Carter and both IPs are out of Hong Kong. 17:51, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • This is continuing at a nearly page-per-minute rate. Immediate block strongly recommended. Kdau 18:09, 2004 Dec 26 (UTC)
      • Blocked for 24 hours.-gadfium 18:17, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

219.77.77.242

219.77.77.242 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

  • Rapidly changing pages to redirects to Haiti, now apparently to Jimmy Carter. I warned user twice on talk page. I've been trying to revert but can't keep up. — Knowledge Seeker দ (talk) 07:56, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • I'll try to help you keep up. -- JamesTeterenko 08:09, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
      • "08:13, 26 Dec 2004, Gamaliel blocked 219.77.77.242 (expires 08:13, 27 Dec 2004) (contribs) (vandalism)". Thanks, JamesTeterenko and Gamaliel! — Knowledge Seeker দ (talk) 08:17, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

203.177.36.83

63.87.241.187

  • ( 63.87.241.187 | talk | contributions) Seems to be a repeat vandal who has resurfaced, re-vandalizing pages that they vandalized in November. Ben James Ben 04:19, 2004 Dec 26 (UTC).
    • Appears to have gone away after a short spree. It might be a good idea to check again, tomorrow. SWAdair | Talk 07:26, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

December 25

219.93.174.0/24

  • Both 219.93.174.110 (vandalized Sailor Moon) and 219.93.174.100 (vandalized several related articles) have been blocked for 24 hours. SWAdair | Talk 00:50, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

82.69.30.92

  • Seems to be advertising a gaming website. It may be possible that this is linked to gandhi-ge-3-1.wh.zen.net.uk (62.3.80.230) 163.078
Have temporarily blocked that IP until tomorrow although they now appear to have stopped. Thankyou for noticing this. Could I suggest that you become a registered user so people can thank you on your usertalk page! --Vamp:Willow 19:49, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

66.131.53.68

  • ( 66.131.53.68 | talk | contributions)Seems to be working their way through an indian film guide and amongst a little useful information on actors creating a large number of pages on films but with no content. Not sure if this should count as vandalism, but conversely not that useful either. Would appreciate another's view. --Vamp:Willow 17:54, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • I sampled the user's contributions, and the articles seemed to give some indication of the subject's notability (awards, box office success). They could use NPOVing, though. Gazpacho 22:27, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

81.156.x.x

  • Clearly same person returning from Dec 13, deleting content at a range of pages. Both IPs blocked for up to 24hrs and will keep an eye out for them returning. --Vamp:Willow 13:24, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

61.55.129.197

eScrew vandal

  • Copying text from www.escrew.com to many different page titles, from a wide range of different IP addresses. -- Karada 11:02, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

December 24

User:Christmas Willy on Wheels

Actually moved VfD to Merry Christmas from the Willy on Wheels! and wreaked total havoc on my watchlist (and others, I presume). Merry Christmas to you too, Willy. Here's to hoping you'll celebrate the rest without Wikipedia... JRM 00:49, 2004 Dec 25 (UTC)
User:195.188.152.14 may be the same person. -Aranel ("Sarah") 01:17, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • I and others mistook User:Goplat for a vandal as he/she tried to fix this damage. -- Jmabel | Talk 01:45, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
The difference between a page move and a new redirect is that a page move will include the text "X moved to Y". Both will be labelled as "new" and the new redirect page will have an empty history. If the page move makes the title better (i.e. it doesn't include "Willy"), it was probably someone fixing a move. (We can learn from this! In case it happens again...) -Aranel ("Sarah") 01:50, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

62.252.192.4

  • Vandalized multiple unrelated pages. UPi 23:32, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Danimal82

  • I've blocked him for vandalism to Romanians. Evidence in user contributions suggests he is Daniel Maycock, keep eyes open for more throwaway aliases. -- Jmabel | Talk 21:05, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
May also be User:68.116.23.111, who has vandalized several pages in the last couple of days, including the Daniel Maycock article. 172.160.82.238 21:04, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

whsipertome

  • User whispertome is reverting edits in India, refuses to back up his claims my edit is an opinion. Claims I'm NPOV for adding anything other than data. I feel this is vandalism, wiki articles are very often present things backe dup by facts, these are not opinions. GregNorc (talk)
Frivolous - It's been explained that it's POV. I stopped reverting after the second rv and I entered talk, but you posted it anyway. This isn't gonna last. WhisperToMe 20:08, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • This is just to ensure you don't revert it again. GregNorc (talk)
Thank you for your insight. However, please read what vandalism is before you post complaints. Masterhomer 20:14, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

217.34.43.195

List of contributions, before I start speedy deletion on some: 

16:11, Dec 24, 2004 (hist) (diff) Brendan Cole 
15:15, Dec 24, 2004 (hist) (diff) Camilla Dallerup 
15:14, Dec 24, 2004 (hist) (diff) Camilla Dallerup 
14:49, Dec 24, 2004 (hist) (diff) Emma Lethaby 
14:47, Dec 24, 2004 (hist) (diff) Harry Lethaby 
14:34, Dec 24, 2004 (hist) (diff) Super Guinea! 
14:29, Dec 24, 2004 (hist) (diff) Shitsherbrain 
14:26, Dec 24, 2004 (hist) (diff) Camaloda

escrew

has been warned, and is now blocked for 24h. dab
watch escrew. User:80.200.243.153 seems to be the same guy, and I have blocked him for 24h, too. the two IPs are not geographically close, and this may turn out to be a comlicated case (trojaned proxies?)) dab (ᛏ) 12:37, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
add User:213.191.118.14. almost certainly a kid with a collection of trojaned boxes all over the place. I feel uncomfortable with speed-blocking so many IP's but it seems to be the thing to do at the moment. dab (ᛏ) 12:40, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
more: User:24.73.149.165
dab (ᛏ) 12:45, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
In case anyone wants to thank for this dedicated vandalism:
whois escrew.com
 Administrative Contact:
     Bychenok, Viktor  escrewzen@yahoo.com
     Pizda 1
     Kiev
     Ukraine.  252056
     UA
     PHONE: +380.380503116905 (FAX) +380.380503116905
dab (ᛏ) 13:12, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)


67.100.29.228

  • Adding nonsense and his e-mail address to many articles. David Johnson [T|C] 11:35, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Jandevries

221.12.180.126

  • Link spam. Please ban immediately. - Kaldari 06:06, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Has been blocked for 24 hours, may be variable IP. Mgm|(talk) 08:52, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)

68.7.217.249

  • Posting original and highly inflammatory articles about a totally fictitious ultra-orthodox Christian organization that "was founded in 2005." Has been politely warned twice. Merry Christmas, by the way.  ;^) - Lucky 6.9 03:52, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

138.89.23.245

  • Homophobic vandalism of Jim McGreevey and his successor Richard Codey. WHOIS points to DSL in NJ. The McGreevey one was only 20 minutes ago so he may be working on other stuff for the future. HoneycakeF 01:34, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Hasn't edited since. Let's see how it develops. Mgm|(talk) 08:46, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)

Gtabary

62.255.64.4

December 23

70.25.123.117

  • Numerious anti-Semitic vandalism in the last hour+ (12 as of this update), all on Augustine of Hippo. Arin WHOIS lookup shows a Rogers Cable user (dynamic addresses), so I recommend a temporary ban. -- Deathphoenix 19:26, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Has collected test1 through test4. --fvw* 19:33, 2004 Dec 23 (UTC)

Armenian (people) (article)

  • Not quite a most-vandalized page (yet), but an IP who has come in variously as 144.122.251.198, 144.122.250.219, 144.122.250.199 (once each) has been repeatedly removing all material about the Armenian genocide. -- Jmabel | Talk 01:22, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)

High speed Willy on Wheels

December 22

24.7.49.23

68.23.99.172

--Theodore Kloba 19:25, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)

163.153.108.13

210.18.190.194 19:13, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

64.114.144.31

User:Nasrallah aka User:Viriditas

  • User:Nasrallah | talk | contributions. This is the third time this user has vandalized my User page within 24 hours. [3] [4] [5]. According to Wikipedia sockpuppet rules such tags should only be placed on a User page if "the account has been unambiguously shown to be a sock puppet of the user by either:
  • the user's own admission
  • matching of IP addresses
The above text should not be added in the cases of accusations of sockpuppetry which have not been proven." --Wiesenthaler 16:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
You really should see about some more proper Dispute Resolution for this; the usual article revert/graffiti removal/page protection people which prowl this page really don't deal with this stuff. Even the ones with Admin power probably wouldn't dare touch the issue on their own. This needs a comittee to look at it, look at the evidence behind it, and make a decision. Sockatume 21:31, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Never mind, you're blocked already. If someone accuses someone else of being a sockpuppet of you, or a sockpuppet of one of the folk you're accused being a sockpuppet of, then please try to come up with a better way to resolve the dispute than multiple posts here. Sockatume 22:07, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

139.133.7.37/8

67.171.251.183

  • 67.171.251.183 | talk |contributions) vandalized Scientology article several times Melaen 13:39, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • User was not warned. I have posted a warning. Gazpacho 16:46, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
      • I posted a stronger warning due to repeated vandalism, the most recent was today. I think a 24-hour ban may be wise if behavior persists. The user seems to be based in Vancouver Washington through high speed from Comcast Cable Communications. -Visorstuff 22:55, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
        • I've posted another warning on his talk page and protected the article, until there is a block request. I'm hopeful that not being able to edit the page will result in 67.171.251.183 stopping his recent vandalism after a 12-24 hour protection. -Visorstuff 23:14, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

62.255.64.6

Block requested. IZAK 08:33, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

      • Blocked for 24 hours by Lupo. SWAdair | Talk 09:27, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

24.76.254.99

  • Anonymous user 24.76.254.99 has made one edit so far [10], vandalizing the Festivus page to state his/her agreement with the edits of 199.120.92.14, enumerated below. I have reverted the edits, but I request that this anonymous user be banned. —ExplorerCDT 07:02, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • User needs to be warned first, which I have done on his/her talk page. —Tkinias 18:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

199.120.92.14

  • Anonymous user 199.120.92.14 has made five edits thus far on Festivus changing links and adding offensive conduct. See [11], [12],

[13], [14], [15], I have reverted the edits, but I request that this anonymous user be banned. —ExplorerCDT 07:02, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • User has been warned. Mgm|(talk) 10:07, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)

User:Vandersaap

  • (Vandersaap | talk | contributions) Vandal... I think this is what I need to do. just look at his contributions...
  • Please sign your comments in this respect. However your point is taken, moreover some of the vandalism by this oaf ís explicitly and unambiguously racist. Sjc 06:34, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • User:Mirv has put a warning on this user's talk page. —Tkinias 18:30, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

User:Nasrallah aka User:Viriditas

  • User:Nasrallah | talk | contributions). Vandalized my User page with an incorrect sockpuppet alert. [16]. According to Wikipedia sockpuppet rules such tags should only be placed on a User page if "the account has been unambiguously shown to be a sock puppet of the user by either:
  • the user's own admission
  • matching of IP addresses

The above text should not be added in the cases of accusations of sockpuppetry which have not been proven." User:Nasrallah is a sockpuppet of User:Viriditas who maintains a pseudo-scientific sockpuppet directory User:Viriditas/wikipuppets that he uses to issue constantly changing stream of accusations of sockpuppetry based on identity mis-matching. His last edit on the directory (about me) was at 02:04, 22 Dec 2004 [17]. Subsequently, he logged in as User:Nasrallah and vandalized my User page two minutes later at 02:06, 22 Dec 2004 [18]. Both sockpuppet User:Nasrallah and owner User:Viriditas should be blocked for User page vandalism. --Wiesenthaler 03:23, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

You added a comment to your own user page [19]stating that you are a sockpuppet. Therefore, you have "been unambiguously shown to be a sock puppet of the user by... the user's own admission", surely? Sockatume 04:02, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Addenum: you do realise the irony of this request, don't you? You say that they labelled you as a sockpuppet with inappropriate evidence. You are calling for a ban because one's a sockpuppet of the other... also with zero evidence. Seeing as so many related users are caught up in this nonsense (Nasrallah, Viriditas, Wiesenthaler...), I suggest that some sort of higher-level arbitration is needed on the entire situation. Sockatume 04:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I admit to being a sockpuppet. That is not the problem and there's nothing wrong with being a sockpuppet. I did not vandalize anyone's User page despite three arrogant and abusive editors doing it to me in the past two days (in addition to reverting all my edits - without just cause). The Wikipedia rule states that the tag User:Viriditas placed on my User page should not be placed on the User page unless the sockpuppet has been shown unambiguously to be linked to a specific User by either self-admission or IP address. User:Viriditas vandalized my User page without either condition being met. He insists on playing sockpuppet detective and trying to link me to other Users so that he can convince sysops to block me for violating the three revert rule - when I have never done so. Today he added the accusation linking me to User:Alberuni. Yesterday, he accused me of being User:Goldberg, User:HistoryBuffEr and User:195.7.55.146. Yesterday, I was wrongly accused of being Goldberg's sockpuppet and improperly threatened with a block by a sysop who lacked evidence but pursued a similar line of abuse and cupidity as User:Viriditas. Tomorrow, who knows what form of abuse they will devise? --Wiesenthaler 04:27, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Ah, I see, I suppose there are plenty of reasons for somebody to set up a sockpuppet, anonymity for example, without there being a need for you to be marked out. Anyway, as I say, it's worth getting a committee of the Higher Ups in to sort things out, as I'm tired of seeing this "situation" popping up on WP:VIP. Frankly I'm pretty tired of people taking potshots at eachother and claiming everyone they disagree with are sockpuppets/are part of this or that generic ideological group/are breaking the 3-revert rule. I'd say that, if people are accusing eachother of breaking the 3-revert rule, it's time to protect the article and get in the Arbitrators. Sockatume 04:42, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Attention by higher-ups is fine by me but there is no question User:Nasrallah vandalized my User page and therefore he and his IP should be blocked. --Wiesenthaler 05:03, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Frankly, your edit afterwards suggesting a job opportunity reflects poorly on your judgment. Please take these petty disputes off the page; we've more serious things to worry about. Mackensen (talk) 05:24, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
You have more serious issues to worry about than User page vandalism? Like what? There have been no other entries of vandalism in progress on this page for over two hours. Perhaps if you took action against any of the three aggressive editors who violated Wikipedia rules by vandalizing my User page in the past two days you wouldn't have to waste your time writing your opinions about what I have a right to put on my User page. --Wiesenthaler 05:34, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Wiesenthaler, you admit to being a sockpuppet. Notices can be posted if the account has been unambiguously shown to be a sock puppet of the user by either:
  • the user's own admission
  • matching of IP addresses

Therefore, placing a sockpuppet notice on your user page isn't vandalism. If User:Viriditas placed the notice "before either condition was met", he could still have matched IPs without your knowledge. If you disagree with that decision, just ask comments instead of attacking whoever is placing them and be sure to include proof of why User:Nasrallah should be a sockpuppet. Mgm|(talk) 09:42, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)

How do you propose that User:Nasrallah/User:Viriditas matched IP addresses without my knowledge? Is secret evidence now accepted to make baseless accusations and vandalize User pages? I don't think so. --Wiesenthaler 16:16, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

207.81.84.59

216.15.87.152

  • 216.15.87.152 | talk | contributions) Maybe it's Paul Vogel again. Adding Cosmotheism article to other articles. -Willmcw 00:02, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Glad you caught that. His anti-Semitic bile is all over the site. Please block this jerk immediately! - Lucky 6.9 00:08, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Blocked for 24 hours.-gadfium (talk) 00:17, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Thanks, Gadfium. The guy vandalized my personal pages while he was at it. - Lucky 6.9 00:19, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

December 21

User:Bukkake bud

(User:Bukkake bud| talk | contributions) Vandalous insertion of image:hello.jpg (goatse.cx image) into articles and user pages. -- Netoholic @ 23:44, 2004 Dec 21 (UTC)

81.155.223.142

User:Tohit

  • Vandalized Sollog - having difficulty reverting to good page. Johntex 17:03, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Banned, if anyone thinks this is too strict, feel free to lessen the block. Mgm|(talk) 10:02, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)
    • I've changed the block to 48 hours. Mgm|(talk) 10:07, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)

24.61.196.82

216.239.183.254

Update. He has contributed to my talk page. It would seem W really was a Cheerleader. Truth is sometimes stranger than fiction. IMHO, his changes should be reverted because they have too much POV, but this may not be a vandalism issue after all. Samboy 15:09, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Chocolateboy

  • Reverting three times is allowed, and he gave reasons for doing so in the summary. Mgm|(talk) 12:16, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
Don't report it per se, but go to Wikipedia:Requests for comment and list the page. This will get other editors' attention, and people will start to look at the page and contribute their input. This will hopefully allow people to come up with a compromise and stop the edit war. If that doesn't seem to help, if the battle is between just two editors, try to reason things out with the editor on the talk page. Then try Wikipedia:Requests for mediation. If that doesn't work, well you can try and put more load on the already overworked arbitrators, but that process takes ages. Samboy 15:13, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

219.77.78.137

  • ( 219.77.78.137 | talk | contributions)
    • This guy has been going on a vandalism rampage. I've tried to correct what I could and I think some people are helping with reverts. -- Addboy 06:26, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
      • One hour block placed on this user. -- AllyUnion (talk) 07:57, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

User:62.152.115.69

  • I'm following this guy round blocking his aliases, but it's getting tedious. I've protected 4chan, his main target, but I can't protect |User:Livajo. I'll probably just protect his main targets. We just need people to keep an eye open. DJ Clayworth 06:33, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

User:SlimVirgin and User:Jewbacca

User:SlimVirgin | User Talk:SlimVirgin and User:Jewbacca | User Talk:Jewbacca have both vandalized my User page [20] [21] [22]. SlimVirgin refuses to answer questions about the vandalism placed on her Talk page and repeatedly deletes my questions. [23] and [24] [25]. --Wiesenthaler 05:42, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC) Reinserted vandalism complaint after improper deletion by User:Jewbacca--Wiesenthaler 05:47, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

What are you talking about?? Provide a diff link! Nothing in the history shows me removing this entry. In fact my response seems to have been removed. Will add it back in below. Jewbacca 05:58, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
Wiesenthaler claims SlimVirgin and I have vandalised his user page. Placing a sockpuppet notice on one's user page is accepted Wikipedia policy and is in fact recommended in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet#Tagging_identified_sock_puppets. User admitted to using sockpuppets in User_talk:Wiesenthaler. Jewbacca 05:44, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

This is your current edit to my User page: "Admitted sockpuppet Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress#User:Wiesenthaler -- Perhaps same sockpuppet as User:Goldberg Jewbacca 03:50, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)" This is vandalism. --Wiesenthaler 06:08, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

It's not vandalism. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet#Tagging_identified_sock_puppets Jewbacca 06:14, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

This is SlimVirgin's edit to my User page: "You should bear in mind that the 3RR does not apply in cases of reverting vandalism, and you are clearly vandalizing Yasser Arafat because you're deleting large amounts of properly referenced material without discussion or explanation. Slim 04:45, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)" This is vandalism. --Wiesenthaler 06:08, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Wiesenthaler, stop the histrionics. I placed my question on your User page in error, and have now moved it to your Talk page. My apologies for that mistake. I have removed your various questions from my Talk page because you are a vandal, and your actions on Wikipedia today have been intended only to distress people. I have therefore no wish further to correspond with you, and will not do so after this comment. Slim 06:22, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
Excuses, excuses. You just violate the rights of others and call them a vandal. I have done nothing wrong. You are just offended by legitimate material that you wish to censor so you call it vandalism. Please restrain yourself from vandalizing my User page and engaging in edit wars and biased POV editing. --Wiesenthaler 06:31, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

83.237.20.71

(83.237.20.71 | talk | contributions) Repeatedly vandalizing 4chan. Ливай | ☺ 05:30, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

216.15.87.53

(216.15.87.53 | talk | contributions) Is pasting the entire cosmotheism article into other articles. Suspected Paul Vogel IP. -Willmcw 05:13, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • Blocked for 24 hours. SWAdair | Talk 05:21, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

User:Wiesenthaler

Mindlessly reverting Yasser Arafat, AIPAC, and making up derogatory terms for List of ethnic slurs. A sockpuppet of User:Goldberg, who is a sockpuppet himself. Has exceeded 3 reverts on the articles and should be blocked. Jewbacca 04:36, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

Please, could an admin help out with this issue? User:Wiesenthaler, who also seems to be User:Goldberg, is adding anti-Semitic material to pages, including his own Talk page, where he's written "I like (k)ike." He's also adding anti-Semitic material to List of ethnic slurs and has deleted material from Yasser Arafat several times today. Other editors are in danger of violating 3RR in an effort to get rid of his vandalism. His edits can be seen here. Many thanks, Slim 05:04, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
See his comment at the bottom of Talk:List of ethnic slurs:
This page is an equal opportunity slur festival, in case he missed the point. All races and ethnicities are subject to slurs equally here. Jews don't get a free ride by whining about anti-semitism, at least not on this page. --Wiesenthaler 04:33, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Your position is utterly absurd. How could possibly think that using anti-semitic slurs while vandalizing articles and acting as a sock puppet is even remotely acceptable? Carrp 05:11, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I have not vandalized articles. The anti-semitic slurs I edited on the page entitled List of ethnic slurs are completely legitimate. Sockpuppets in and of themselves are not a violation of any rules. Do you need any more help finding answers today? --Wiesenthaler 06:51, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
You are the one mindlessly reverting pages Jewbacca. In any case, making reversions and reasonable edits is not vandalism. As for the List of ethnic slurs, all of them I made are completely valid. See [26]. If you have a complaint, take it to the Talk page. This attempt to block a user for making edits you do not like is just an abuse of Wikipedia process. Did you really attend Stanford? --Wiesenthaler 04:43, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
It's funny how a "non-sockpuppet" who made his FIRST edit today is familiar with this page. Jewbacca 04:45, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
There's no law against sock-puppets. There is a rule against misusing sock-puppets to evade the three revert rule or other deceptions. I never claimed to be new. But I'm not Goldberg as you have maliciously accused me (in violation of Wikipedia civility rules). Finding this page was easy. Just followed your trail. [27] --Wiesenthaler 04:54, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I do not have to be civil to someone who proudly adds anti-Jewish terms to List of ethnic slurs and uses anti-semitic slurs on his own user page. "I like (k)Ike!", where kike is a derogatory term for Jew. Jewbacca 04:57, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
You don't like my edits s you think you have a right to violate Wikipedia rules? Instead of exempting yourself from Wikipedia rules and norms, why not just exempt yourself from Wikipedia? --Wiesenthaler 05:04, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Reinserting this entry after Wiesenthaler vandalized this page by removing it Jewbacca 05:14, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

Notice abusive edit summary on this page's history from Wiesenthaler: "I like (k)Ike" is a term of endearment, like "you're my #1 nigger" Jewbacca 05:16, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

  • One does not have to look carefully at Wiesenthaler's wonderful new ethnic slurs to recognize his disingenuousness here. Examples:
    • ZOG – U.S., Jews. Refers to Zionist Occupied Government, the Jews' influence over US politicians.
    • Zionist – U.S., Europe, South America, for a Jew. Refers to most Jews' political goal of colonizing Palestine.
    • Nickel nose – U.S., a jew. Refers to facial characteristics and money-centered nature.
    • German candle – U.S., Jew. Refers to incinerated Jews in World War II.
    • German oven mitt – U.S., Refers to incinerated Jews in World War II.
  • This isn't editing an encyclopedia; this is inserting explicit anti-Semitic sentiments. My conclusion is that Wiesenthaler is what Jewbacca says he is: a vandal. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 06:10, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Maybe you should delete the page if you don't want anti-semitic slurs in the encyclopedia. I don't see you complaining about the anti-black, anti-arab, anti-italian, or anti-chinese slurs. Thisis the source. Maybe you should sue them too. [28]. --Wiesenthaler 06:17, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Nope. It's not the anti-Semitic slurs -- it's the definitions of them. "Money-centered nature"? "Most Jews' political goal"? Good try, but you're not fooling anyone. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 06:35, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
It's all in the source, if you bothered to check [[29].
  • "7.06 Zionist: Jews are typically Zionist in political nature. The ultimate goal being to take over Palestine. Also: Zog",
  • "Gargamel Jews Refers to greedy, money centered nature of Jews. Reference from Smurfs cartoon."
Where is your outrage over any of the other slurs except for Jewish slurs? You are fooling no one. --Wiesenthaler 06:42, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Who cares where you're copying the garbage from? It's still garbage, much of it made up solely for the purpose of putting it on that list or a similar one. "German oven mitt" indeed. At any rate, my outrage is irrelevant. Show me some other entries on the list which have definitions that are, in themselves, ethnic slurs (as opposed to descriptions of them.) If your entries said, for example, "Nickel nose: Refers to stereotype of facial characteristics", it would be clear that you were not attempting simply to try to get away with your anti-semitic utterances, but rather were legitimately expanding the article in question. Such appears not to be the case. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 06:56, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Who cares about sources? Indeed. You are quite the encyclopedist. Show you some other entries that are themselves ethnic slurs? Take your pick from any letter of the alphabet. EuroNazi – U.S., Europeans, referring to Europe's history of dictators, communists, nazis, and imperialism

Europhile – U.S. Any European, especially mainland Europeans, who are perceived as sexually promiscuous and overly passive Eurotrash – U.S./U.K., Europeans gatecrashing society by trading on false claims of wealth, titles of nobility etc. Euro-weenies – U.S., Europeans, particularly French, who don't support instances of US foreign military intervention Euro-spic – U.S., Someone of mixed European-Hispanic ethnicity. c/f Ponce de Leon. etc etc. Gorilla – a big, fat black person. Need any more help? --Wiesenthaler 07:15, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • Good demonstration. Perhaps you're right; those also don't belong in an encyclopedia. The way to deal with that, however, is not by adding more garbage; it's by removing the garbage which is there. Feel free to do so, if you are so inclined. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 07:43, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Agree, the best way to deal with racist non-encyclopedic crap is to remove it, not to add to it. A little bit crazy, but hey, that's what I'm here for. FWIW, I've not heard many people in the UK use "Zionist" as a synonym for "Jew", except to make some tired political comment. Sockatume 06:03, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
These oh so politically correct sentiments are just window dressing for what is really just very common bias and censorship in Wikipedia. No one listed the slur page for VfD, did they? None of these moralistic self-serving Jewish editors lifted a finger to delete a single slur against anyone but Jews, did they? But when I added the slurs against Jews to this long list collection of pejorative terms for every other race and ethnicity - oh look out! I am accused of being anti-semitic. My edits are reverted. A complaint of vandalism is lodged against me. I am hounded and harassed. --Wiesenthaler 06:25, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
        • Actually, you're wrong. The page was listed for VfD a few months ago. It was voted to "keep", but most of the "keeps" indicated the page needed serious cleanup. It wasn't cleaned up. It's on VfD again, and you've made an excellent case for removing it.--jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 08:23, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I demand to immidiately ban this user, for antisemitic incitement appears on his user page. MathKnight 21:07, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Who the hell do you think you are to demand anything around here? This isn't Israel where you think you can push people around with your guns, Mr. Terrorist. You don't like one day's worth of Jewish news pulled straight off Google News? Tough sh*t sherlock. Don't read it. No one asked your opinion anyway. --Wiesenthaler 21:16, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Antisemitism in not accepted here. See yourself warned. MathKnight 21:24, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This sockpuppet has been blocked. (not by me) Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 21:37, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
And unblocked by someone else, who seems to have misinterpreted the reason for blocking:
reason for blocking: (sockpuppet created to violate policy)
reason for unblocking: (Being a sock puppet does not violate policy.)
--jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 22:16, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

64.172.24.129

68.21.174.114

82.33.47.210

24.229.209.120

December 20

Slimvirgin vandalized my page so I returned the favor.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User:Goldberg&oldid=8659151


24.26.153.118

contributions)

    • User overwrote most of the content of terminal ballistics with "LOL!" and a string of random characters. I reverted the page as soon as I noticed (the page is on my watchlist) and I attempted to report the indident to the IP owner's abuse department. scot 21:49, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

63.226.96.241

  • (63.226.96.241 | talk | contributions)
    • Creating many pages with links to www.wikisucks.com and various websites. Defacing other pages with the same. Part of the Sollog attack. -- KneeLess 01:39, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

69.194.194.27

He/She/It is still vandalising. --Lst27 (talk) 00:06, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

CheeseDreams

66.210.38.254

66.79.173.211

213.239.235.206

User:Hephaestos_dies!

  • Done yesterday, but spotted now: a w*nker created a user on huwiki (and most probably on other projects). See hu:User:Hephaestos_dies! and contributions (I blank them just for now, not deleting). I'll delete the stuff but would be nice to check around other smaller wikipedias and delete the user ID too. Please reply on my talk, too. --grin ✎ 19:46, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)

213.239.235.206

  • This user made threatening remarks against the President on the George W. Bush page. Besides being vandalism, it's also a federal crime to threaten the President and his family.

67.137.248.71

  • 67.137.248.71
    • keeps vandalizing 4chan (might not want to see what is there some of the time) - erasing it's contents and inserting things such as links to pictures and actual pictures of (...ugh) making it a "shock page"
      • Blocked. You may politely refer to these pictures as "goatsex" and people will know what you mean. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 02:39, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

64.12.117.8

172.134.41.254

— Saxifrage (☎) [[]] 10:14, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

December 19

67.167.1.59

  • is currently on a vandalism spree... has vandalized multiple pages, inserting lewd comments mostly, in the last hour. Help me with damage control!
Slugmaster 08:44, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Damage control complete. - Slugmaster 08:54, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

24.19.152.87

156.34.86.148

  • (156.34.86.148 | talk | contributions) is replacing pages by "hi" and the like. Has been warned repeatedly, please block. --fvw* 01:52, 2004 Dec 19 (UTC)
    • Hmm, I think he just got bored and left. That works too I guess, though I'd still prefer it if WP:VIP was monitored a little more frequently. --fvw* 02:10, 2004 Dec 19 (UTC)

Bazookatooth

  • (Bazookatooth | talk | contributions) Adding multiple copyright violations despite warning. Now removing copyvio tags, see e.g. MF DOOM
    • He removed a few more copyvio tags: I put them back. Almost all of his text consists of copy/paste from various web sites. He uploaded a mess of images also. The logos he uploaded I slapped a {{logo}} tag onto, everything else was clearly ripped off from various websites so I removed them form the pages he added them to. -- ClockworkSoul 02:41, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
      • He doesn't seem to have been listed at WP:CP, which he should have been, if there are copyvios involved. (except C-Rayz Walz which I caught in a previous trawl of unlisted copyvios) --rbrwr± 18:44, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

December 18

68.41.173.219

162.97.100.170 aka 68.206.32.245 aka "Epsilon3"

  1. Vandalism - deletion of Uses of torture in recent times replacement by "single sentence" [31]
  2. Personal attack on User:FT2 and others eg [32]
  3. Vandalism reverted 4 times already today (Dec.18 2004, see article history).
  4. Meaningless drivel on article talk page [33], also see User:68.206.32.245 (see [34]). FT2 18:46, Dec 18, 2004 (UTC)

141.158.180.237

24.19.152.87

24.13.145.196

213.18.248.19

65.29.130.194

--JM Robert 03:20, Dec 18, 2004 (UTC)

December 17

212.135.1.53

  • There seems to be some random vandalism comming from this IP address every three or four days. I checked the last 6 or 7 edits (from Nov. 25 to Dec. 17), and they were all vandalism. Examples:

[44] [45] [46] Wilke 22:23, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Cheesydreams (NOT Cheesedreams)

I archived some of their vandalism on User talk:Cheesydreams, since page moves are erased from their contribs after reversion. -- Netoholic @ 20:50, 2004 Dec 17 (UTC)

143.50.61.66

(143.50.61.66 | talk | contributions) His vandalism was reported on Dec. 14. His IP is: 143.50.61.66. He keeps posting non-published personal views which I have refuted at my personal weblog. It is unacceptable that a non-specialist administrator like (Hadal | talk | contributions) (who is not a physicist!) would revert my editing back to this individual's diatribe. I do not have the time nor the energy to correct this person's vandalism and misinformation being publicized by tacking himslef onto popular pages discussing my work i.e. the Afshar Experiment. I have already told him by e-mail that he can put his comments in the discussion section and we will have a go at it, but that he should not go directly to the main page without a published reference for his arguments. We did this with (Lumidek | talk | contributions) and the results have been satisfactory to both sides. I request that 143.50.61.66 be immediately blocked for Sneaky Vandalism.- Prof. Afshar 14:38, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Um, so you're listing me along with a supposed vandal because I reverted an unexplained deletion? I saw an IP remove an entire section of (seemingly valid) material without justification; you could have used an edit summary to explain your actions. I've noticed that, judging by IP similarity, it would appear you've been editing double-slit experiment for quite some time, and from the edit history, I'm not the first person to revert your changes (e.g. here). I'm sorry for intruding on your pet article, but please understand that adding one point of view to an article is not vandalism. This page is not for listing content disputes, which is what I'd call the tiff between you and 143.50.61.66. As for what's "acceptable": Anyone can revert anyone's edits, and your edits have no priority over the edits of others. -- Hadal 20:28, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Dear Hadal, I did not intend to put you in the same category as the vandal. I understand why you felt your action was justified, but the issues being discussed are very weighty matters in the physics world, and it is not easy for non-experts to point out a logical vs. nonsensical arguments. Besides, I have no quarrel with the Vandal posting his arguments in the discussion section, where I will accordingly respond. It is just that it is not professional to put out disinformation on a popular page without going through the discussion page first. Until he has either published his arguments, or gone trhough the discussion process 143.50.61.66 should not be allowed to reduce the quality of the main pages. Prof. Afshar 15:46, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • This is not vandalism. This is a disagreement. You can have your dispute on the talk page; you can enter a request for comment; there are various ways to deal with this. But it's not vandalism. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 00:38, 18 Dec

2004 (UTC)

What would you call this [Sneaky Vandalism]? The red words on the left are his "objective" contributions! Also, please take a look at his history of content removals. This inexcusable behavior on a serious topic at the heart of Quantum Mechanics must stop. I am new to Wikipedia, and would appreciate your help with this individual. As I said, I have no problem with a discussion on the discussion page, but he should not be allowed to devalue the contents of the main pages by his juvenile antics.-- Prof. Afshar 20:35, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I agree that the addition in question is not vandalism. However, I think this addition violates a couple of items from what Wikipedia is not: Wikipedia is not a soap box (item 3) nor is it Primary research (item 9). I think we are encountering a fundamental problem with Wikipedia here: We do not differentiate between a well-renowned physicist and any 'ole yahoo on the net who posts something anonymously; there seems to be this idea that a well renowned physicist's point of view about advanced physics holds no more weight that some yahoo on the net who barely passed physics at community college. This is, well, wrong (and one of my objections to young earth creationism; YEC can only exist in a world where some small-town preacher who has never taken a geology course can somehow know more about geology than all the well renowned geologists). If you want real scientists doing articles about the science they know well here on Wikipedia, there should be some consensus that their ideas (in their area of expertise) hold more weight than someone who won't even give us their name. Samboy 01:47, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

150.199.179.92


82.32.38.159

Unknown Vandal

  • Some vandal completely deleted my user page a few days ago, so there is no history or anything. Can this vandal be found and punished? --68.107.102.129 12:47, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I've checked the deleted edits from your user page and it seems its content was offensive. Feel free to create a new user page, but I won't restore this. Mgm|(talk) 12:55, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
"Seems offensive" ?! I don't think it was offensive. Can anyone tell me who deleted my user page and why? If Wikipedia a free-for-all deal with no accountability? --68.107.102.129 15:54, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
User's talk page is now on my watchlist. - Ta bu shi da yu 13:08, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Ta bla bla bla is obviously trying to silence and intimidate me. --68.107.102.129 16:06, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Please ignore my previous post regarding IP 68.107.102.129, I mistakenly thought it was mine which is 68.163.249.72. Sorry about the mixup with Hadal's thread!!! Afshar

Mouseman11713

BalowStar

  • This user has added an irrelevant link to Boomer bible in a number of significant articles such as Sigmund Freud, Karl Marx, Pablo Picasso etc recently, and s/he continues to do so in other articles. I have reverted a few edits but I think there are many more than I'll be able to cover on my own. -- Simonides 00:52, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This user also created, by apparent copy/paste, a duplicate article The Boomer Bible. I just made it a redirect back to the original Boomer bible article. Seems to spamming to advertize. Vsmith 02:26, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

24.165.102.68

  • This individual has made extensive bizarre and biased changes to the Kwanzaa article attacking the holiday's founder, and has removed the clean up notice from that page and the pages needing cleanup page. If it were just that I wouldn't list it here, but 24.165.102.68 has gone into his user talk page to change what people wrote there to him (and made it look like I had signed something I never said) and gone into the talk page of the Kwanzaa article where other editors were mentioning their reverts of his changes and he went and changed the IP address listed so it read something completely different. I can only imagine he hoped that if we went to block him, we'd block the wrong person. I'm not sure what needs to be done about all this, but the trying to change the comments and the mention of his IP address prompted me to mention it here. DreamGuy 02:03, Dec 18, 2004 (UTC)

December 16

216.194.62.104

Vandalizes Armenian-related pages by replacing 'armenian' by 'turkish'.--Neigel von Teighen 18:29, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
After talking with him, the problem has been resolved (he's a newcomer). No longer an alert. --Neigel von Teighen 22:47, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

66.99.246.227

Vandalism since Sep 8, 2004. — Kbs 18:22, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

62.253.64.12

  • Vandalized this page (vandalism in progress) twice. Should be banned immediately. — Mateo SA | talk 17:18, Dec 16, 2004 (UTC)
  • Already done. -- Karada 17:52, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

62.232.27.10

65.162.184.6

  • Has since been reverted. — Mateo SA | talk 03:37, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)

152.163.100.203

212.219.247.129

67.163.124.100

168.212.239.2

  • ( 168.212.239.2 | talk | contributions)
    • Has created several related pages, likely "self styled" after himself and those around him, this ip (belonging to 'Washington School Information Processing Cooperative') is likely shared amongst others as there are previous beneficial edits, suggest a short-term ban for the time being. --Kyrin\talk 19:08, 2004 Dec 16 (UTC)

24.8.12.20

December 15

159.247.237.171

  • Static IP, given his second warning. Mgm|(talk) 20:49, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

64.218.194.120

  • Vandalized the Welcome page four times this morning.
  • Has a long history, all of which appears to be blatant vandalism. He was also put on this page on December 9. --Jeff 17:54, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • IP is part of IP range, but user seems to have static IP. I've blocked him for 24 hours. Mgm|(talk) 20:42, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

DrZoidberg, Honeycake and Kyrin

(Moved to the talk page.)

195.170.17.169

  • Continued after warning. Blocked for 24 hours. -- ClockworkSoul 15:30, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

62.255.249.204

  • vandalized 3 unrelated pages so far, including one twice. -Rholton 15:20, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • He now stands at 7 pages in 20 minutes. Was warned about 5 minutes ago and seems that he may have stopped. I'm watching him for more activity. -- ClockworkSoul 15:35, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

61.145.200.25

4.245.98.208

  • Vandalized two unrelated pages so far. UPi 08:23, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Looks like the same guy blocked at 24.8.12.20 - the first page he hit was the last one he hit form the other IP. I posted him a {{test2}} and will watch him some more, just be be sure. -- ClockworkSoul 08:31, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

24.8.12.20

Inserting random nonsense into multiple pages. I have reverted some of them. UPi 08:04, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

    • I blocked this IP for 3 hours. Should be enough -- ClockworkSoul 08:06, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

61.149.223.228

  • Vandalism on Sex Computer Network and other pages; looks to be an attempt to give his page more links. Samboy 07:41, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Update: He's vandalizing pages at a rapid page; at this point, I'm just reverting anything I see this IP contribute without verifying it's a link spam. Samboy 07:58, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • He continues to change links. I'm blocking him for 3 hours. -- ClockworkSoul 08:21, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

205.188.116.200

  • Vandalism on Belisarius and possibly other pages. We may want to block the entire class C; there have been vandalisms from this class C as recently as three days ago. Samboy 07:33, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
That's an AOL block. We see alot of vandalism from there, but blocking it for a long period of time is inefficient. :: -- ClockworkSoul 08:16, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

69.198.165.0

  • (69.198.165.0 | talk | contributions) is a returning user adding nonsense Carleton University related articles. Doogin got deleted through vfd recently, two more nonsense articles have been speedily deleted so far today. User has been warned but that didn't stop them vandalising the last time they were here. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 03:27, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

24.69.255.205

80.3.64.7

64.53.212.134

69.194.194.27

He's already been blocked once and has ignored warnings, so I've blocked him for 7 days. As he appears to be using a static IP address on Rogers (almost certainly a cable modem) I suggest that we block him permanently if he tries again. -- ChrisO 00:44, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Permanently seems overkill, but half a year or so would be fine by me. --fvw* 00:48, 2004 Dec 15 (UTC)
He's back. Re-ban please? That half a year sounds good right about now. --fvw* 21:36, 2004 Dec 18 (UTC)
  • I see he's been blocked for a year. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 22:04, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • And he's back again. What's going wrong here? --fvw* 23:46, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)

24.164.229.150

  • (24.164.229.150 | talk | contributions) has repeatedly vandalised Help:Contents and been warned. Has also modified this message repeatedly. --fvw* 00:13, 2004 Dec 15 (UTC)
    • 24.164.229.150 auto-vandalized this entry again. If there is evidence of an apology I have not found it. 24.164.229.150 seems unrepentant. Hu 03:03, 2004 Dec 15 (UTC)

December 14

143.50.61.66

  • (143.50.61.66 | talk | contributions) is a returning user repeatedly removing content and adding nonsense to popular pages discussing the Afshar Experiment. He has been warned by e-mail, yet vandalism continues. Must be blocked.-- Afshar 23:40, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

68.211.64.96

142.32.208.233

130.179.16.*

Multiple IP addresses, almost certainly used by a single person, repeatedly vandalising Template:Sandbox. I have warned two of the IP addresses. My slow dialup link makes it impossible for me to keep up with this vandal. —AlanBarrett 20:52, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

They are still at it. Please could somebody block the IP address range. —AlanBarrett 21:18, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I blocked 130.179.16.0/25 (the range of 130.179.16.0 to 130.179.16.64) for 24 hours, which blocks most of umanitoba.ca (which lives at 130.179.16.1 to 130.179.16.69). -- ClockworkSoul 21:58, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Correction: 130.179.16.0/25 blocks the range of 130.179.16.0 to 130.179.16.127. -- ClockworkSoul 22:06, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

wiki originated attack

On 12/13/2004 between 12:33 and 12:55 pm, my firewall software detected an attack from 207.142.131.245 www03.wikimedia.org, the nature of the attack was "Microsoft Multiple Application/OS GDI+ JPEG Processing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability attempt detected". I've never had any dealings with wikimedia, but my understand is that it is closely associated with wikipedia. Please investigate a possible virus, or malicious administrator at your site.--Silverback 12:06, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

It looks to me like someone may have uploaded a JPEG containing the GDI+ buffer exploit. Although it could be a false alarm. Can I ask the following questions to clarify... Were you viewing a wikipedia page at the time of the warning? Did the page contain images? What is your OS? What is your firewall? -- FirstPrinciples 22:23, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

68.248.199.3

Created junk article Ruth Closius, totally unverifiable. I've nominated it as a speedy. Alphax (talk) 15:33, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
Anon has removed the speedy delete notice. I've warned them with a {{test1}}, but it's late and I can't be bothered doing much more. Alphax (talk) 15:50, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
User also created aother articles along the same line that are verifiable. This may be a case of obscure but still noteworthy material. ClockworkSoul 17:32, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

65.28.250.105

Vadalised Kings Island page, deleted entire article and changed external links to point to pages not matching subject matter. This vandal did it at least twice.

User:Goldberg

Has left ad hominem attacks on AIPAC, User:Viriditas and Talk:Yasser Arafat. Has been a persistent problem at Wikipedia (see previous vandal report, problem reverter, a likely sockpuppet, and should be blocked indefinitely. Jewbacca 09:24, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
If you do not agree with his edits you should go through dispute resolution. Goldberg has not broken the 3RR as far as I can determine. And his edits are not blatant vandalism. If I'm wrong, please provide links to diffs for further examination. Mgm|(talk) 10:47, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
Goldberg vandalized my User page and personally attacked me [48]; Goldberg also personally attacked me twice on Talk:Yasser Arafat, in what could be construed as vandalism of the talk page. [49] [50]. --Viriditas | Talk 15:21, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Vandalism:
Bullying or stubbornness Some users cannot come to agreement with others who are willing to talk to them on an article's talk page, and repeatedly make changes opposed by everyone else. This is a matter of regret—you may wish to see our dispute resolution pages to get help. However, it is not vandalism.
Harassing or making personal attacks We have a clear policy on Wikipedia of no personal attacks, and harassing other contributors is not allowed. Some forms of harassment are also clear cases vandalism, such as home page vandalism. However, harassment is not in general vandalism.
Goldberg obviously has problems with your reverts and calls you names for it. It's unfortunate, but not vandalism. Go through the proper dispute resolution procedures, and I'm sure this can be resolved. Good luck! Mgm|(talk) 19:44, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
Um, he vandalismed Viriditas's user page (not Talk:) (see immediately above). Jewbacca 21:01, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

216.208.81.169

Only four articles hit so far today, but I can't watch any longer tonite. Niteowlneils 05:30, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Blocked for 24 hours. (Direct allocation IP). Mgm|(talk) 11:14, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

216.196.186.176

  • Only contribs are adding various names of "gay people" to the Gay page. - Deathphoenix 03:45, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Blocked for 12 hours. Mgm|(talk) 10:34, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

84.9.31.204

  • The only contrib is a revert with calling editors "Islamofascists".
  • Looks like a returning vandal using same IP block or proxy, see 84.9.31.130 below and previous contribs.

HistoryBuffEr 02:48, 2004 Dec 14 (UTC)

It was an abusive edit summary, but the revert does not qualify as vandalism. Jewbacca 02:52, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
Interesting, see who is defending pals in socks. HistoryBuffEr 03:42, 2004 Dec 14 (UTC)
A revert of your version on an article that has seen your version reverted dozens of times is not vandalism. Jewbacca 04:07, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
Looks like a rather petty argument, in my opinion. If you want to see real jihadipedia, check out Islam, Qur'an and the things linked in there.
[8.12] ... I will cast terror into the hearts of
those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off
every fingertip of them. - Allah [51] [52] [53]

--68.107.102.129 04:00, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • One edit can not be called persistent vandalism. I cannot block the IP without further vandalizing conduct from the anon. Mgm|(talk) 10:50, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

68.235.238.16

    • Blocked for 24 hours. Mgm|(talk) 10:53, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
IP Search returns:
Adelphia Cable Communications ADELPHIA-CABLE-6 (NET-68-232-0-0-1)
68.232.0.0 - 68.235.255.255
Adelphia 68-235-224-0-Z10 (NET-68-235-224-0-1)
68.235.224.0 - 68.235.255.255
May be variable IP assignment... Mgm|(talk) 10:56, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
  • Scratch that last comment. Vandalism over period of time to same article. Mgm|(talk) 10:57, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

168.221.27.194

  • Adding nonsense articles, presumably about himself and adding the info to the year pages. Warned before. - Lucky 6.9 01:08, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Explained that aka's aren't part of page titles... Mgm|(talk) 11:06, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

198.234.202.132

  • Adding nonsense edits.--Deglr6328 02:01, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

December 13

66.66.117.237

  • (66.66.117.237 | talk | contributions) is vandalizing a large number of pages edited by me or related to me in some way, inlcuding my user and talk pages. See the contributions list. This user is also vandalizing a number of other non-Wikipedia sites owned by me under various user names as well as harassing me in various other ways, and will probably not stop vandalizing until banned. I have good reason to believe that this user has also created an account as Factchecker007.
    • IP blocked for 24 hours. Mgm|(talk) 10:41, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

216.186.53.2

66.43.178.54

  • (66.43.178.54 | talk | contributions) is back to his old tricks again, creating lots of copyvio articles; has been warned repeatedly. -- fvw* 18:42, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC)

212.219.94.173

81.156.*/81.157.*

68.42.251.192

December 12

Gzornenplatz has violated arbitration injunction

Trusted administrators,
I apologize for placing this here, but do not know where else to report a violation of an arbitration injunction.
I need to inform you that User:Gzornenplatz has violated the section of the injunction against him (and other editors) that states "Gzornenplatz, Kevin Baas, Shorne, and VeryVerily are banned from reverting any article more than twice in one 24 hour period whilst Arbitration is on-going. Sysops are hereby authorised to enact 24 blocks for violations of this." Gzornenplats has violated this rule, reverting a page three times in 24 hours here: revert one, revert two, and revert three
Please ban User:Gzornenplatz for 24 hours for violating this injunction.
Once the arbitration case is closed and Gzornenplatz is banned for at least two months, we hopefully will not have to deal with this again. Samboy 23:14, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Samboy -- Perhaps G'platz has violated the injunction, but you've violated the 3RR in the same article. Perhaps you should both be blocked? --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 23:24, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • I have blocked both users for the above reasons. Mackensen (talk) 23:46, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

62.97.196.2

The_Willy_on_Wheels%21

  • Mister vandal. Lot of vandalism

Anr 22:27, 2004 Dec 12 (UTC)

  • Nasty, read the guy's page.

83.109.133.64, Rdsmith4

  • Breaking the 3RR rule is not vandalism. Please see the guidelines at the top of this page. — Mateo SA | talk 03:25, Dec 12, 2004 (UTC)
Had a look through the guidelines and it doesn't comment on the 3RR, but on the 3RR page it does state that if you are not an admin you should list it on this page. Evil Monkey → Talk 03:35, Dec 12, 2004 (UTC)
I hadn't realized that about the 3RR page. Since that is the consensus, I'll go along with it, of course, but I still think this is an inappropriate page for 3RR requests. Maybe we should create a separate page for those requests. — Mateo SA | talk 05:36, Dec 12, 2004 (UTC)

MarySaintJohn

Kelba

December 11

Multiple, repeat bad edits at Benedictine

  • A series of anon vandals at 168.229.*, and most recently at 128.59.168.78, have been inserting the name of "Eugene Leipounski" as a supposed stepbrother of St Scholastica into the Benedictine article; and more recently added the claim that he was homosexual. According to Mpntod, Eugene Leipounski is a real, twentieth century person from New Jersey and not a sixth century monk. -- Smerdis of Tlön 17:18, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

69.194.194.27

  • ( 69.194.194.27 | talk | contributions) has been vandalising & blanking pages for several days now. Now on 5th warning. About time this IP was blocked. David Johnson [T|C] 14:47, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Now on a page-blanking spree. Needs blocking immediately. David Johnson [T|C] 14:51, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Immediate IP block required, keeps blanking Current Events, Help and similar pages. Solver 15:08, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
      • Blocked by Dori and myself. -- ChrisO 15:11, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
        • Thanks Chris. Solver 15:14, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

24.11.21.192

  • Blatant copyright violation, dubious edits, created article for Anal spew as well as 3 articles for himself. Probably a juvenile.
Kaldari 02:13, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

December 10

Rambot

  • I'm only half-serious here, but can someone direct me to the conversation page where Ram-Man was given permission to spam everyone's talk page? - Ponder 23:43, 2004 Dec 10 (UTC)
We're discussing this on Ram-Man's talk page. I wouldn't have raised an alert if there had been a link in the bot's message to a place where the use of a mass-message had been approved by consensus. The bot has been halted for now. -- Ponder 00:32, 2004 Dec 11 (UTC)

81.157.11.246

  • Multiple counts of vandalism, starting with Hans Island at 20:47, then revandalised at 22:20 after that page was reverted. Vandalised ten other pages in the next ten minutes.
  • Text of the vandalism suggests that this user is either British, Canadian, or both (just my opinion).
Deathphoenix 23:19, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

207.166.7.200

  • 207.166.7.200 | talk | contributions
    • History of dubious edits, recieved a two-week ban back in the middle of November, and now they're back and continuing where they left off. Well worth keeping an eye on for their tampering with the VfD pages on their stuff, removal of VfD notices, and the like. I'd reccomend a permanent ban. Sockatume 22:25, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
      • Since December 1st, this user has made 18 edits that include obvious vandalism [54] [55], a number of questionable edits [56] [57], creation of bunk articles [58] [59], removal of deletion notices [60], and a forgery at least one signature [61]. I tend to concur with the permanant ban. -- ClockworkSoul 22:52, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

4.37.73.58

67.82.95.236

  • ( 67.82.95.236 | talk | contributions)
    • Vandalized article on English Civil War, and articles related to it, with random insertion of "THEN LORD JAMES OF SCOTLAND BROUGHT A LARGE ARMY AND CAPTURED ENGLAND. CAVALIERS ROUNDHEADS NEW MODEL ARMY TORIES PURITANS SCOTS DIGGERS LEVELERS GREEN RIBBON CLUB HIGH CHURCH PARTY".
Daerandir 12:23, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

213.166.17.23

AndrewH 12:07, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

70.17.202.212

December 9

81.153.33.120

{duplicate request from David Johnson follows)

  • (81.153.33.120 | talk | contributions) is inserting the word "controversial" into many articles. I warned the user on the IPs talk page; their response was to vandalise my user & talk page in the same way. Please block this guy. David Johnson [T|C] 22:28, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • I blocked this IP (nslookup gives hostname of host81-153-33-120.range81-153.btcentralplus.com) for 24 hours, but I don't know how to do a mass-revert yet. Can somebody else do that real quick? -- ClockworkSoul 22:36, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Nevermind - I got it. He had inserted "controversial" into about 30 entirely random articles, give or take. -- ClockworkSoul 22:45, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

80.43.134.93

24.155.128.5

64.218.194.120

209.175.21.2

  • (209.175.21.2 | talk | contributions) is vandalising various pages, adding either nonsense or replacing single words to create factual inaccuracy which would normally be hard to spot. Has had 4th warning and has continued regardless. David Johnson [T|C] 17:49, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

24.173.58.138

  • Now creating hoax articles with imaginary biographies. They sometimes go unnoticed because they are longer than the average unsigned contribution. Deb 17:45, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

207.230.201.178

  • (207.230.201.178 | talk | contributions) Wiped out Congo Civil War, when I tried to revert it (I couldn't get the latest version so I was going to have to get the second oldest and they add diff with the latest to get the latest) 207.230.201.178 simply deleted it again with the following text, "NO THIS ARTICLE WILL REMAIN DELETED. IF YOU KEEP PUTTING IT BACK, I WILL JUST DELETE IT AGAIN".
  • I had just nominated this to be a featured article and was going to put the template in when this began happening.
If I were an administrator I'd handle it myself, but I'm not so here you go. Kevin Rector 16:51, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)

220.236.152.72

  • (220.236.152.72 | talk | contributions) keeps cutting major portions out of Ayer. Warned by Hadal and myself. Persists. Since I'm involved, I gather I'm not who should block. Will someone else, please? -- Jmabel | Talk 07:23, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)
    • I looked over the list of edits to verify and took the liberty. Current block is for 24 hours unless somebody sees fit to change that. -- ClockworkSoul 07:25, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Blue This, Bleu Cheese

Tagishsimon
[vandalism removed]
This user has also created the account Bleu Cheese and vandalized this post. — Mateo SA | talk 06:33, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)

68.224.196.94

  • Repeated blanking of 4chan, replacing text with profanity/gibberish. Kurt Shaped Box 02:17, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

24.230.26.23

205.188.116.134

  • Weird little bot-type edits, including removing a comment on that "Ambition" card game on VfD. Has also removed warnings from the anon user page, answering "youre not welcome" to the one remaining warning. Almost all vandalism in the past from this IP from what I can tell, including its most recent to Siberia. - Lucky 6.9 01:35, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

December 8

159.134.149.174 / 159.134.149.47

Tony Sidaway|Talk 20:24, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Probably the same person, as these are both IP's from Eircoms pool. Eircom have one of the toughest TOS's ever, if you want to really punish someone for vandalism... Kiand 20:51, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

84.9.31.130

  • (84.9.31.130 | talk | contributions)
    • Responsible for three nonsensical vanity articles and vandalism to three legit articles. No prior edit history. Has been warned. - Lucky 6.9 19:38, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
      • Actively removing the speedy delete notices from the nonsense and adding more to the "mush note" vanity articles. Help!! - Lucky 6.9 19:42, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

129.19.68.66 / 129.19.68.114

  • Keeps adding nonsense and self reverting shortly afterwards, see Dijkstra's algorithm. Has been warned before — see the talk pages. BACbKA 09:55, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

68.21.161.50

  • Keeps removing the sandbox template. 66.32.248.236 02:36, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

155.33.79.75

  • Blocked for 24 hours according to SWAdair. Mgm|(talk) 08:13, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)

68.107.238.229

December 7

65.175.203.50

  • Repeatedly blanking Pokémon. I cannot verify whether any of this user's other edits are legitimate. kelvSYC 23:11, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • I only see 4 blankings - two for Sean Howard and two for Pokemon. Left a message on the talk page. - RedWordSmith 23:24, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)

207.28.99.145

Vandalising date pages and creating nonsense pages. -- FirstPrinciples 20:45, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)

204.38.32.6

  • 204.38.32.6 | talk | contributions Has made many edits to various articles, most of them obvious vandalism, either blanking pages or writing things like "Ted sucks his mother." Has been already warned twice on his talk page. --Kpalion (talk) 00:31, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
He's back and still vandalising 20 hours later. FirstPrinciples 20:20, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
  • Blocked for 24 hours. Mgm|(talk) 21:17, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)

Goldberg

  • (User:Goldberg | talk | contributions)
    • This is a sockpuppet (along with FamilyFord car4less) whose only edits are attempts to get around the 3-revert-rule and continue efforts to force wholesale replacement of the Yasser Arafat article with an article rewrite by User:HistoryBuffEr. HistoryBuffEr has been in revert wars on the Yasser Arafat page attempting to replace the article with his personal version for three months, wiping out many other editors' work, and refusing to engage in discussion on the Talk page. There is an ongoing arbitration case concerning HistorBuffEr for this [62]. Meanwhile, all of Goldberg's edits have been reverts to HistoryBuffEr's previous wholesale rewrite versions, usually after HistoryBuffEr has exhausted 3 reverts. Here is Goldberg's latest revert to HistoryBuffEr's version [63]. Notice that Goldberg is reverting to a copy of HistoryBuffEr's wholesale replacement from 4 days earlier [64]. Also, please note that "Goldberg"'s claim to be replacing the "anti-semite version" is a sham, since he's replacing the same version HistoryBuffEr claims is "pro-Zionist". This Goldberg sockpuppet should be permanently banned; its creation by whoever created it was purely to cause disruption. --MPerel 19:59, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)

198.234.206.4

218.188.3.124

After being banned for 24 hrs on Nov 22nd, this user is back vandalizing. Awolf002 12:39, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Blocked for 48 hours. Mgm|(talk) 12:48, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)

195.188.243.2

  • This user is repeatedly vandalizing Encryption and related pages. Talk page shows a history of warnings (and I've just added another). --PJF (talk) 12:04, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Blocked for 24 hours. Mgm|(talk) 12:57, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)

68.21.185.217

  • This guy is having a little too much fun in the sandbox.
E r. I agree. But he now seems to be having fun adding himself to vandalism in progress [65]. Cool Hand Luke 03:29, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

60.25.119.200

4.139.57.147

70.56.161.49

  • Has vandalized several pages claiming he "pwns" them, including the vandalism in progress page and my user page. Norman Rogers\talk 00:39, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

December 6

68.224.211.201

  • ( 68.224.211.201 | talk | contributions) User is engaged in repeatedly vandalizing the 4chan article. Requesting SWAT team and air support ASAP. :: DarkLordSeth 22:31, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Looks like a dynamic IP. Has stopped now, but can be blocked as soon as vandalism starts again. Mgm|(talk) 08:36, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)

166.109.178.51

  • ( 166.109.178.51 | talk | contributions) (I'm fairly new here, not sure the correct format for reporting vandalism.) This user is vandalizing butterfly related pages (and maybe others) by blanking much of the article and posting complete nonsense. Has posted nonsense on related talk pages also. Jonathunder 17:03, 2004 Dec 6 (UTC)
  • Anon has just 3 contributions, all reverted. And one warning on talk page. Please try to warn user before reporting him. Mgm|(talk) 19:10, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)
    • Again, I'm new, so bear with me if this is the wrong procedure. Part of the reason I wanted to report this was there were very simular nonsense things from other IP addresses in the 166.109.178.xx range, and I think it is the same person doing this repeatedly.
    • More specifically, it looks like this is Ectoplasmic Goo | talk | contributions who also appears to be posting from 166.109.178.182 and 166.109.178.171
Jonathunder 20:49, 2004 Dec 6 (UTC)

207.208.196.2

  • ( 207.208.196.2 | talk | contributions) Contributed supdawg which was vfd'd and voted out. Today he added it again and removed a speedy. He has also vandalized at least one other page adding a nonsensical supdawg category and interfered with vfd process on his original supdawg. --LeeHunter 16:47, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

194.80.204.22

  • Has stopped after warnings on talk, edits have been reverted. I'll wait this one out. Mgm|(talk) 11:20, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)

ExplorerCDT

  • Has been repeatedly redirecting pages that are on VFD when no clear consensus has been reached. I asked him to wait for consensus, and he told me to shut up. Check his comments on my talk page. He is disrupting the vfd process. --L33tminion | (talk) 07:06, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)
  • He's been reverting reverts of his redirects, too. Not quite up to the 3RL as far as I've seen, though. --L33tminion | (talk) 07:12, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)
  • He's also been adding smart-ass remarks to articles (Microsoft, for example). I've warned him; we'll see what happens. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 07:25, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

194.213.41.14

  • Apparent link-spam bot.

24.159.186.88

  • Added patent nonsense about 20th Century Fox having distributed Pokémon (anime) movies in Japan (they have not), and reverting my (legitimate) edit on Pokémon Sunday and calling me a troll while doing so. However, some of this user's edits appear to be legitimate. kelvSYC 05:24, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Try discussing things on the user's talk page first. If they have indeed some legitimate edits this is not the place to report them. Mgm|(talk) 08:53, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)

70.177.170.196

  • Vandalised this very page. Nuff said. kelvSYC 05:17, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

208.48.205.238

61.145.206.xxx and 61.45.207.xxx, the "Guangzhou spammer"

  • ( 61.145.206.133 | talk | contributions) The "Guangzhou spammer." Usually he hits the Jew article. He's in a database of known massive internet spammers [68], for example, and uses a variety of IPs closely related within the range 61.145.206.xxx through 61.145.207.xxx. I suspect he adds massive spam to the Jew article because the article has a high Google ranking, and he wants to increase the Google ranking of his pages. He has been persistent for a while, and has been warned numerous times. Antandrus 01:29, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

82.32.38.159

Vandalizing several pages. Specifically those that deal with Microsoft and alternatives. Is apparantly a Microsoft-lover. He is altering pages with Microsoft's bugs to show names of competitors and alternatives with praises to show Microsoft's software. Examples: Linux, Windows XP, Internet Explorer.12.222.93.120 01:28, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I have blocked him for 24 hours. --Slowking Man 01:31, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)

December 5

210.54.53.13

  • Even continued vandalising already vandalized article as I was trying to revert. Banned for 24 hours. Feel free to block again if behaviour continues after expiration. Mgm|(talk) 21:38, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)

169.151.1.214

  • ( 169.151.1.214 | talk | contributions) I reported this IP address for vandalism on November 26, and the IP user has come back to vandalize again, on December 2 and December 3. Those recent cases of vandalism have been reverted by other Wikipedians. Steve Casburn 19:50, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)

User:Wfgh444

  • Replaced the content of the Rennes-le-Château several times by his own comments. After I protected the page and suggested a dispute resolution process on the talk page, he started replacing the talk page by insults, which I have reverted several times. (see the history of the article and the history of the article talk page). olivier 19:35, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)
  • Given user pointers on Civility and "no personal attacks". This is not yet persistent vandalism, IMO. Please try dispute resolution first. Mgm|(talk) 21:47, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)
  • The particular user in question has blanked and replaced related articles before. His intentions are basically good, but I don't think he quite "gets" how Wikipedia collaboration works. Gwimpey 20:41, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)

24.24.93.91

  • Placed test3 message on user talk page. Test2 seemed to slow whoever this is down, maybe mentioning that they could be blocked will stop this. - RedWordSmith 19:53, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)

User:Mr Vandal

December 4

81.152.223.19

(submitted by User:Glueball)
  • User has only 2 edits. Please report again if vandalism persists, but please try to reason with the user first. Mgm|(talk) 13:23, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)

Chan Han Xiang

  • (Chan Han Xiang | talk | contributions)
  • Marking legitimate articles VfD out of spite; modifying other users comments on VfD and other talk pages. This is escalating. I strongly suggest a 24-hour block. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 18:54, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Found he removed a comment from another user here. Am investigating further. Mgm|(talk) 19:16, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)
      • Has stopped after warnings by jpgordon, feel free to block later if behavior continues after time I stamp this comment with. Mgm|(talk) 19:22, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)
  • Has at least once (since Mgm's comment) deleted other users signed comments in WP:VIP. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 23:58, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

207.81.89.222

  • Has stopped editing after Estel's warning. Mgm|(talk) 19:25, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)

24.9.10.235

  • So far 18 removals of pictures from Vagina and Penis articles in the last 30 minutes, all of them reverted, the edit war is still ongoing. Rafał Pocztarski 10:48, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • The person doing the deleting expressed their frustration on the Penis:Talk page, apparently unaware that the topic of pictures in the Penis and Vagina pages is an active discussion in Wikipedia. Hopefully they will read it and stop. I hope this one can be filed under 'clueless newbie'. --Ejstarchuk 10:58, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • I'll file it under "clueless newbie". User has enganged in discussion on Talk:Penis after warning. Is no longer reverting at this time. Mgm|(talk) 19:31, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)

December 3

65.49.189.224

  • Blocked for 24 hours. Mgm|(talk) 16:57, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)

70.56.149.35

  • This user is rapidly adding links to a number of commercial sites, presumably to improve Google ranking.

Woegaohghgljahsdgj

  • Blocked for 24 hours. Mgm|(talk) 17:04, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)

207.102.176.111

  • Vandalising Legal drinking age and marking for deletion after my first revision. I'm too new at this to handle this person quickly (or accurately without a lot of looking up). Also editing my user page, so they're probably not just experimenting. - 20:37, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Aeconley
  • Is gone, so blocking won't help. Feel free to report him again if he returns with similar edits. Mgm|(talk) 19:42, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)

67.87.234.103

  • Has made a series of small edits: some are obvious insertion of errors; others I have no information to judge whether they're true or not. All his edits today need checking, and probably reverting, I think Malcolm Farmer 21:39, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

212.159.106.109

  • Vandalized two existing articles and cut loose with a malformed and vicious anti-Semitic and anti-American rant. Guy can't even spell simple words.  :^) - Lucky 6.9 21:22, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

193.207.168.126

  • Vandalising year pages. - 20:39, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC) Lee (talk)
  • Yup, seems to be using a script that vandalizes the pages one year at the time, is into the future now.. Script adds naughty picture and pretends to be "helping to fix common mistakes on the wiki" in message. Martijn faassen 21:43, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Can't someone block that IP or something? A2Kafir 21:36, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • User just now started the counter at 1 and was working his/her way up; made it to 6 before they were stopped. Lovely. - jredmond 21:53, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
above text restored after deletion by Willy 0.01
  • This user has been falsey accused of vandalism please unblock user and revert back to his edits. He has e-mailed me and says that said edits were done by an imposter who registered a IP address similar to him. Willy 0.01 22:11, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
How are these accusations "false"? That IP address — not one "similar", but that particular IP address — added the penis image to all of those year articles; the edit histories offer proof of this. And, frankly, there is no way we're going to revert and put that image back on the top of all the year articles from 1950-2078. Nice try. - jredmond 22:25, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

User:144.126.232.164

User:216.113.225.201

User:141.154.227.246

84.47.54.137

User:Nossr50

  • (User:Nossr50 | talk | contributions) Everything contributed by this user was vandalism. New attack has been launched just half an hour ago. Has previously received Warning #1, #2 and now #3, also continued under another IP - User:66.82.9.81 | talk | contributions. Oneliner 11:31, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Blocked username for 24 hours, IP still needs investigation. Mgm|(talk) 11:42, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
      • The vandalism by (User:66.82.9.81 | talk | contributions) was apparently done by User:Nossr50 as well, however the same IP contributed two or three relevant edits before. Possibly due to dynamic IP assignment by the DSL provider. Oneliner 12:05, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)

User:Gtabary

  • Usuage of abusive language by using these words: "Generating mess and noise" and "stop making noise" just because author by writing Medical Specialist Centre article; when actually it was highly wikified, and true facts. He supposed to have made the reply more friendly. Considered as a Indirect Personal attack.
- User:Chan Han Xiang, 10:14, Dec 3, 2004

The following was deleted by User:Chan Han Xiang, as part of his continuing pattern of changing and deleting other editors' signed comments. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 18:43, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Tc191

  • User changed details of page elephant into rubbish, however written in a way that most people wouldnt react without knowledge.
  • Blocked for 24 hours. Mgm|(talk) 11:47, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)

222.152.196.205

  • User is blank page vandalising the pages of black metal musicians.
Rje 09:23, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • User hasn't been warned about page blanking. Mgm|(talk) 11:51, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)

12.220.161.74

  • Constantly adding nonsense. Another speedy delete was put up on a previous article, and they keep recreating it. I've placed my last warning on his page. One more, and he/she should get blocked for 24 hours. - Ta bu shi da yu 06:29, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

65.184.155.227

  • Racist garbage at an article called "Arabic terrorist." Hydriotaphia 04:19, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)

Ectoplasmic Goo

  • Random feces (literally) on a couple of articles, a talk, and their own talk page. - UtherSRG 02:09, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

84.47.87.248

User:24.185.149.111

  • User:24.185.149.111 may not be a vandal in the narrow sense, but seems to be doing nothing but inserting copyrighted material into existing articles. Has been warned, no way to know if he/she has read the warnings. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:06, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
    • I now believe this wasn't a vandal at all. It appears that David Storobin of Global Politician was attempting to donate material from his own site, and it never crossed his mind that it would appear to be someone else violating his intellectual property rights! I've suggested that he set up an account so that it is clear what is going on here, then log in and re-add his contributions that have been reverted (inappropriately, as it turns out) as copyvios. -- Jmabel | Talk 07:26, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
Even so, he could try to integrate the added text into the articles. So far the contributions of 24.185.149.111 were to dump a bunch of text into seemingly random place without any attempt to integrate it into existing writing. On the other hand, he never failed to sign the text with an URL to his web site. This appears more like a desire to promote the web site, rather than to make a useful contribution. --Gene s 07:56, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

216.209.153.2

  • This was brought to my attention by another anon. Seems this guy is posting a bunch of nonsense articles about a non-existent or totally non-notable actor named Paul Paquette. No IMDb for him or his movies whatsoever. Also a bogus article called "Arrowhead" about this guy's supposed band. He put the info on the Arrowhead disambig page. Google points to an artist of the same name. Not the same guy. To top it off, I'm getting nasty notes on my talk page from a fairly new registered user who insists that untrue articles aren't speedy deletion candidates. He's posting them for peer review instead. I already reviewed the articles. They're totally false. Sigh... - Lucky 6.9 00:02, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

December 2

207.70.141.194

  • Deliberate vandalism. Previously warned in August (As per user:talk)
  • Bourgeoisie
  • Reproduction Sex can also be called Fucking by younger adults. A few people said, "It feels good going in and out of the vagaina, and then the climax is great!"
Fifelfoo 22:16, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

204.193.6.90

156.63.190.132

205.213.111.53

  • adding graffiti, removing content from US constitution articles Pedant 15:22, 2004 Dec 2 (UTC)

67.86.182.204

  • Blanking random articles and replacing with nonsense. Has been warned for doing so before. Goplat 02:56, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Blocked for 24 hours, if vandalism repeats after expiry date, maybe a longer block is neccesary. Mgm|(talk) 12:59, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)

64.12.116.201

  • ([[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] | [[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contributions]]) Might be the B-Movie Bandit; see the original version of this article and its edit summary. The IP (according to whois.arin.net) is an AOL proxy in Manassas, VA, which has previously been suspected of being used by this person. — A.M. 01:46, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Can someone do some more research, all I can find on this person is substub creation. This might be malicious, but so far I found only 1 warning on his talk page. Mgm|(talk) 13:02, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)

Jesus in a cultural and historical background (article)

  • article continuously being blanked and converted into a redirect
N.b. see the article talk page for commentary on this issue. CheeseDreams 00:35, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

CheeseDreams

  • created Jesus in a cultural and historical background for spite (IMO), doubling the controversy on a protected page, after obstructing consensus-building attempts on that page. Cheesedreams may be no ordinary vandal but his behaviour seems to have reached some sort of crisis point, at this point IMO he is one toe over the line, and bears watching. Pedant 15:48, 2004 Dec 2 (UTC)
Read the comment by Llyrwch on the talk page of the article in question, and you will see the reason why the page exists CheeseDreams 18:16, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

December 1

212.217.2.36

  • The "Willy On Wheels" moron has made his return. bot-style. HUGE amounts of rapid-fire nonsense! - Lucky 6.9 23:23, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

206.172.38.200

--Mixcoatl 23:19, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Blocked for another 24.

81.10.76.254

195.188.152.10

  • Returning vandal judging by talk page. Blocked for another 24 hours. Mgm|(talk) 20:48, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)

70.88.129.205

Has apparently been blocked before, see his talk page - maybe a longer block is in order -- Ferkelparade π 14:24, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I've blocked him for another 24. --jpgordon{gab} 15:46, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

83.29.19.9, 83.29.11.3, 83.29.13.118, 83.29.41.67

  • (83.29.19.9 | talk | contributions) Repeatedly spamming Kraków with a link to commercial site cracowonline.com (hotels etc in Kracow). The spamer changes IPs daily, but they all come from 83.29.0.0 - 83.29.127.255 (NEOSTRADA-ADSL). The spamer has been warned numerous times, and has been revered by various people many times. --Gene s 09:37, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
spam continues, this time from User:83.29.10.48 --Gene s 08:52, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

217.106.58.222

Users Critical and CStar

  • Has there been a troll / vandalism on eight pages and three users?
For the record, the user Critical ( talk, contributions), who slapped the "disputed NPoV" sticker on some pages, has made his or her first edits tonight (or today) and within less than two hours has attacked eight articles for PoV, including (ironically given the CStar example given on the Logical fallacy talk page), Physical law. These were the only "edits" (plus weak justifications on talk pages in the same vein as this one). I don't think the PoV claim has merit. We may ask if this series of attacks is to be taken seriously.
For the following reasons I am thinking that these pages has been the victim of a tiresome semi-sophisticated troll and the PoV sticker should be removed sooner rather than later, if not immediately. We may note that CStar ( talk, contributions) after making edits, paused during the period user Critical made edits, and then CStar took up responding to these edits after the series of user Critical edits ends, as if there is only one user involved, and the user logged out, changed cookies and logged back in. Further, user CStar left a note on Charles Matthew's talk page, Chalst's talk page, and Angela's talk page pointing to a supposed PoV accusation placed on the Logical argument page, when in fact no such sticker has been placed. Perhaps the irony regarding the Physical law page is not so ironic. Hu 05:26, 2004 Dec 1 (UTC)
I've responded to this on the Logical fallacy talk page.CSTAR 14:40, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Point of information
I have responded to this on the logical fallacy talk page, as well as on the pages of the above mentioned users. It does appear that these pages were as Hu suggests the victim of a tiresome semi-sophisticated troll. But I wasn't the perpetrator. This suggestion appears to have been an honest mistake, I consider the matter closed, and it appears that Hu does as well. CSTAR 01:56, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Anthony DiPierro

  • Repeated revert-editing of Vulva. [[User:Davodd|DAVODD «TALK»]] 03:59, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)
That's not vandalism. Take it to RfC if you wish to get consensus for your preferred version. anthony 警告 04:08, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
It's not vandalism but you are violating the Three revert rule, a policy which may be enforced by a 24h ban. -- Solitude\talk 11:06, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)
It's not vandalism - and I don't think it's voilation of 3RR (6 reverts in two days) I suppose he might have got the timing wrong on one of them but I'm not willing to split hairs. What it is is disruption. Anthony you have been reverted by four different people - you cannot win a revert war - so give it up please. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 11:19, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_investigation/Archives/2004/12&oldid=1109967006"