Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eckvic Culture
There were Russian hybrid languages. Did/do any of these get to be a majority? Is this a culture? Is this anything other than a political push and vanity? Geogre 01:41, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC) Note that Netoholic decided that he could delete this nomination without voting. That is page vandalism. Geogre 03:16, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC) Since Netoholic said that VfD was not for verification, let me be more explicit: Google shows no hits for this topic. Geogre 03:16, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Please note that it is not your place to decide if my reasons are valid. It is disrespectful to nominators to second guess them, and it is, indeed, vandalism, to remove nominations. As a Wikipedian of long standing, I can be assumed to have a good reason. Geogre 15:32, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence. Prank. Mikkalai 03:31, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Zero Google hits on Eckvic. Post it somewhere and have fun, but not on Wikipedia. Antandrus 03:42, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. What Mikkalai said. -- orthogonal 04:24, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: fabrication. Houston, we have a problem -- User:El Coronado has been very busy writing fishy articles [1], build around a certain Anarcho Coronado. My guess is that everything contributed by User:El Coronado is a fabrication; we've got a lot of cleanup work ahead. Sigh. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:36, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, it's interesting and therefore worthy of being in this encyclopedia! -- Crevaner 09:42, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete --[[User:Allyunion|AllyUnion (Talk)]] 11:09, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. (Atheism is a sect? :-D) — Timwi 21:15, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Well, it's sect-y. -- orthogonal 03:20, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Unverifiable, probably fabricated. — Gwalla | Talk 01:01, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete.Appears to be imaginary or a prank. Jayjg 03:20, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Deleting, per author; see User_talk:RickK. Mikkalai 04:53, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)