Talk:Neopragmatism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology

I am the author both of the Wikipedia page on "Neopragmatism" and of the content at Neopragmatism.org.

Please restore the Wikipedia entry. I am the copyright holder and the owner of Neopragmatism.org.

David Hildebrand

POV + OR

All due respect, sir, but your views on what pragmatists believe aren't widely held. Neopragmatism is not fundamentally a linguistic thesis. I must remember to come back and fix this article at some future date. KSchutte 20:20, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pragmatism isn't Neopragmatism. Neopragmatism is a very broad characterization, and Hildebrand's thesis about it being a return to the theoretical/linguistic approach is well-documented if probably not applicable to all neopragmatism (I mean, finding a common denominator for later Rorty and Quine is nigh impossible, except that they are both influenced by pragmatism but diverge from it - hence 'neo'). So, in my opinion, this article does need to be expanded and nuanced, but the information that is available now is not in any way fundamentally wrong as far as I can see. It is just very limited. By the way, Hildebrand's views in Beyond Realism & Anti-Realism are actually way more complete than what he presents here. Stdbrouw 02:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serious cleanup needed

I knew nothing of neopragmatism, coming here by way of a wikilink from Positivism. After reading this article, I believe I know even less than I did before. This is an incoherent mess. Dlabtot (talk) 20:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neopragmatism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131120161622/http://eepat.net/doku.php?id=neopragmatist_philosophy_of_education to http://eepat.net/doku.php?id=neopragmatist_philosophy_of_education

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]