Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmic Ethics

More of the same as Folk Culture. -- Jmabel 07:07, Jun 12, 2004 (UTC)

• Delete - this is an advert for Nazism masquerading as an article!!--XmarkX 09:32, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
• I repeat what I said in my objection to the objection about the Reichsfolk entry - if we desire to understand - and counter - such things, then such writers and :activists, and their ideas, should be studied, in a rational and unbiased way, and their ideas countered openly and rationally. Or, do you mean to imply that articles about such topics should only be written by an active opponent of those ideas? Which would, of course, not be unbiased. KEEP Coolmoon 10:36, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • "Coolmon" is the article's creator, which voids his vote. Wyllium 12:31, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
    • Yes, but not my opinion, I hope! Coolmoon 12:47, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
    • No vote, but being the article’s creator does not void his vote. Rossami 13:13, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
• 115 google hits, most referring to this concept. Perhaps clean article? Give more background, strive for NPOV (wikipedia is not a soapbox), but overall a reasonable keep, perhaps combining with Folk Culture (not saying i support the idea, just seems to be of note) -- siroxo 12:30, Jun 12, 2004 (UTC)
• I agree with siroxo about clenaing up the article a little - NPOV. This applies to the Folk Culture one as well. Coolmoon 12:47, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
• 115 is not a significant number of hits. Delete. Snowspinner 17:32, Jun 12, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. RickK 22:50, Jun 12, 2004 (UTC)