User talk:NeilTarrant
Talk deleted 22:50 on Thursday 2004-12-30 as I'm bored.
You're welcome, and it's not that obscure... the Isle of Wight was one of the tips of the Wealden Formation, which helped start everything until that huge boom across the Atlantic. If you used the book to write the article, you might want to write it up as a formal reference... it's pretty authoritative :) 68.81.231.127 10:47, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
IAYC
[edit]Hi Neil, I am the suspicious person, who edited the IAYC page. Indeed, as you guessed correctly, I took part in the IAYC. If it was once or twice I forgot. For details cf. http://www.iayc.org/people/address.php .
Probably I am not rally the most unsuspicious one with respect to advertising the iayc... but as I said: I am not part of the organising team...:-) --CWitte 16:43, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
St. George's Day
[edit]St. George's Day has been proposed at UK COTW. I'd noticed you'd shown interest when it was previously nominated, and now the UK COTW page is once again seeing more interest there are high hopes that something will happen with the article. Please come along to the board and register your vote and any thoughts. Grunners 04:56, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
rehash of UK CotW
[edit]Hiya, I've made a few modifications to the UK Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Week, and I thought you'd be interested in the new page and helping out again with it, as you have contributed in the past! :) Talrias | talk 21:09, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
Template for Election Candidates and Results
[edit]Neil, based on your (really nice) original table of election results on the IoW page, and input from elsewhere, I've created a pukka set of templates at Template:Election box. 80N 15:49, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
heartsease
[edit]Hi Neil... if I've read the history correctly, you added to the heartsease page the remark that "Heartsease have a large number of coloquial name, up to two hundred". Do you have an authority for that? It's an interesting observation but perhaps should be backed up. seglea 00:08, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Sadly no, that was way back before I knew that everything should be referenced properly, and was based upon a quotation from QI (a British game show).
Hi, just to let you know that the list of UK participants at the UK notice board was getting rather long, so I have replaced it with the above category which I have added to your user page. -- Francs2000 | Talk 
30 June 2005 20:28 (UTC)
Dear Neil,
Given that you have contributed significantly to UK Parliamentary constituency articles, I suggest you enrol in the above linked WikiProject o them.
As an aside, I am also a student at Oxford (Oriel College), and given a reasonable similarity in intersts in politics, I was wondering if you might be willing to meet up some time? --New Progressive 23:48, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Peer review
[edit]I noticed your peer review for List of parties contesting the United Kingdom general election, 2005 was orphaned on the PR page :(. Peer review is wonderful in principle, but just doesn't get the sustained traffic. Anyhow, I've made some comments on it if you want to check it out. Marskell 23:57, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
Astronomy heads-up
[edit]Hi - I edited astronomy last night to remove some excess astrology stuff, including the listing of astrology as a field of study under astronomy. My changes were quickly reverted by a self proclaimed judicial astrologer. As you have argued for rationality in the astronomy article before, I thought you would find it interesting - and help may be needed :-) Thanks, Vsmith 14:33, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Sub Pages
[edit]Were you looking for User:NeilTarrant/PageAds? You can find all your sub pages by searching. κаллэмакс 10:51, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Montenegro referendum map
[edit]Sort of shades of the whole red state/blue states thing stateside, but judging by the coverage I caught of the Montenegrin referendum, the "Yes" camp was associated with the colour red and the "No" camp with blue. Might flipping the colours make the map better? The Tom 22:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Heraldry
[edit]Hi Neil, I was wanting to include Heraldry in Version 0.5, but unfortunately there is no formal references section. I posted a request here but no one has responded. If you were involved in writing some of the article, could you possibly rectify this? I can't believe that none of that enormous "further reading" list was used as source material! Thanks, Walkerma 02:42, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Dude!
[edit]You're page is a complete mess! Sort it out. When do u start uni again btw? --- Richard CHSTalk
- Yeah I may or may not have been under the influence... Not too bad here, not a lot going on though - still seeing chimp occasionally! How about you? --- Richard CHSTalk 23:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Jonathan_Hare.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Jonathan_Hare.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Planet Definition
[edit]You might find this website of interest in that it breaks down the types of planets.
Please note it is not authoritative as of yet, but it is rather concise.
Planetary Classification List v6
Abyssoft 15:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject University of Oxford
[edit].jpg)
|
As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the University of Oxford. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Casper Gutman 16:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC) |
Sark
[edit]Thanks for catching my poor disambig at Sark (planet); I didn't know that the page of Sark (disambiguation) even existed!
Yoghurt
[edit]I want to start out by saying I'm really sorry that this happened - I did my best to stop it (since the discussion has happened so many times), but sadly I have been overruled by 4 people who are obsessed with name changing (regardless of whether or not I agree with them). There is a new debate on the Yoghurt talk page about the move - I just felt it would be best if most people who had voted in the past knew about this.danielfolsom 00:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Your Note on Downloading Trek Fan Films Outside U.S.
[edit]Hi, was curious about this. Are you saying that people can only download these things if they live in America? That seems odd. They're available from the creator's website and mirrors for download, plus they're all on YouTube. Surely there is not something that stops people who own PCs in other countries from downloading and viewing them. . . is there? Signed, confused Sir Rhosis 19:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Actually I meant to say that one can only download from the iTunes store (and probably the XBox thing too) in the US. --Neo 19:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- No, I think the ITunes thing is only for the downloading of the official TOS Remastered eps. Anybody, anywhere, with the right media program can download the fan films from the fan film creators' sites or from places like YouTube. Sir Rhosis 19:53, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Coercive Unanimity
[edit]Can you find some citations for dictatorships coercing unanimity ?SimonHolzman (talk) 18:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I know you've done work on Isle of Wight articles, and thought you'd be interested to know that I've just started Wikipedia:WikiProject Wight. I think there's a lot more that can be done with the island's articles, and this should help us all to work together consistently. I hope to see you there! --Peeky44 (talk) 11:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
[edit]Hi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
Addbot (talk) 07:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Mathmo
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mathmo, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathmo. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mrh30 (talk) 12:53, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Recent edit to lead section of Isle of Wight
[edit]Hello again! You did exactly what I was about to do - reverting the last edit made to Isle of Wight. I think this one might flare up, so input at Talk:Isle of Wight#Is the Isle of Wight in Hampshire might be handy... --Peeky44 (talk) 12:26, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
I converted the redirect you stole into a disambiguation. I hope that is satisfactory. —EncMstr (talk) 21:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of International Astronomical Youth Camp
[edit]
The article International Astronomical Youth Camp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- lacks 3rd party references demonstrating notability of this organization.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of International Astronomical Youth Camp
[edit]I have nominated International Astronomical Youth Camp, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Astronomical Youth Camp. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan (talk) 17:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Potato chips and race
[edit]Should I call you Doc? ;-) My nephew has his doctorate in physics, impressive and congratulations! As you grew up in England, I am going on the assumption that you were not exposed to the institutional racism rampant in the USA, that has reared its ugly head ,esp since the election of our President. Are you still in the deep South? Growing up, nowhere was it mentioned in history books the importance of the contributions African Americans made to this country. I.e., the of inventor of the cotton gin which revolutionized that industry. As a small child, I witnessed the Civil rights struggle and remember well some of those events in Birmingham etc. It is important that even a triviality such as the potato chip article that recognition of such persons be acknowledged, removing it could smack of racism, just sayin'. I do not want my black grandchildren to be deprived of the knowledge of their ancestors, as I was. I didn't learn of many ,many of those facts until I went to University in the 90's. When my daughter married a black man, I became even more sensitive to the entire issue, as I became exposed to the racism I had not experienced before. This may be TMI, but I wanted you to understand from whence I am coming. So, please just leave in the designation. Thanks. Namaste...DocOfSoc (talk) 22:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- <smile> You haven't quite convinced me that it needs to go there, but since you were nice enough to leave such a pleasant message on my talk page I won't revert you. Still I think you may be fighting an uphill struggle on this one, so don't be surprised if someone else reverts your change. --Neil (talk) 23:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- It's ALL an uphill battle is this arena! Thank you! <smile> DocOfSoc (talk) 00:38, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Request for comment
[edit]This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to Wikipedia policy. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of WP:UCN and WP:EN continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English), and your comments would be appreciated. Dolovis (talk) 17:24, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
The article Oakwood Park, Enfield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG. Not every municipal park is notable and there is nothing that makes this an exception.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop 02:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
fffhp
[edit]Oh no, really? Please could you elaborate as to exactly why it has been deleted - so I don't waste my time in future. Hillbillyholiday talk 23:25, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi NeilTarrant, I've declined your speedy as no valid criterion was provided; prodded instead: nn neologism; one radio show does not equal notability. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:43, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Georgia (country) to Georgia move suggestion
[edit]Please comment here. Thanks. georgianJORJADZE 18:32, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of List of records of the United Kingdom for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of records of the United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of records of the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, NeilTarrant. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, NeilTarrant. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Hollywood Science for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hollywood Science, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood Science until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)