Talk:Hippocampus

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Tadair4.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Role in memory

I would like to add the following after reference 31 in the section Role in Memory because I believe it contributes our understanding of the involvement of the hippocampus in memory:

Experiments using intrahippocampal transplantation of hippocampal cells in primates with neurotoxic lesions of the hippocampus have shown that the hippocampus is required for the formation and recall, but not the storage, of memories. <Virley, D., Ridley, R.M., Sinden, J.D., Harland, S., Williams, C., Rashid, T., Gray, J.A., Lantos, P.L. and Hodges, H. (1999) Primary CA1 and conditionally immortal MHP36 cell grafts restore conditional discrimination learning and recall in marmosets after excitotoxic lesions of the hippocampal CA1 field. Brain, 122, 2321-2335.> Mountain9 (talk) 19:42, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Issues in recent peer review

This article has been peer reviewed by a neuroscientist recently, discovering several issues: Wikiversity:The Hippocampus#Peer review comments
These issues need to be amended, and I appreciate any help with these matters. After such an amendment, the article can be published in WikiJournal of Medicine, which is an open-access journal with no publication charges of any kind. The article will then be given standard citation formats and DOI codes so that it can be cited by external works. If you help out, you can be displayed among the main authors of the publication in WikiJournal of Medicine if you want, but you then need to agree and sign the "Submission letter", and you should also write your real name. In any case, contributors will be attributed by a link to the article history of Hippocampus. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions.

Cheers,

Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Editor-in-chief, WikiJournal of Medicine

I have responded to the review. Looie496 (talk) 14:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your replies. So, the main issue that needs to be addressed before inclusion of the article in the journal is the disconnect between hippocampal involvement in declarative memory versus spatial navigation, preferably by mentioning functional imaging studies. The peer reviewer has referred to the following works:

• Schiller, D.; Eichenbaum, H.; Buffalo, E. A.; Davachi, L.; Foster, D. J.; Leutgeb, S.; Ranganath, C. (2015). "Memory and Space: Towards an Understanding of the Cognitive Map". Journal of Neuroscience. 35 (41): 13904–13911. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2618-15.2015. ISSN 0270-6474.
• Buzsáki, György; Moser, Edvard I (2013). "Memory, navigation and theta rhythm in the hippocampal-entorhinal system". Nature Neuroscience. 16 (2): 130–138. doi:10.1038/nn.3304. ISSN 1097-6256.

Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Just to note that the Nature Neuroscience article is paywalled.--Iztwoz (talk) 17:47, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Think it needs a section on the neural layers --Iztwoz (talk) 22:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Mikael Häggström, have finished my input hope it wasn't too much. best --Iztwoz (talk) 10:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

The para on avoidance conflict is also useful to address the disconnect between the other two functions; also it has MRI evidence and is also a growing area of research. There could be additions made from reviews of the topic. ? --Iztwoz (talk) 14:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Have just added to this - if its still not wanted it can be removed. If it is to stay a mention needs to be made in the lead.--Iztwoz (talk) 14:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm now notifying the peer reviewer about these additions too. Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

The peer reviewer gave some (perhaps final) comments in the box below. Iztwoz, please let me know if you will make further edits to the article shortly, or have me bring it to the editorial board for publication decision as it is. Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Memory is pervasive, and is employed in many applications, including approach-avoidance conflicts, navigation, and many many more challenges in our everyday lives. Highlighting these two applications can mislead readers to think the hippocampus is dedicated to these applications rather than appropriately thinking of them as among an enormous range of situations where we employ memory. ... I have nothing further to offer. I recommended removal of reference to approach-avoidance conflict, but they include it anyway, and I recommended they clarify navigation as supported by the memory functions of the hippocampus, and they do not.

Hi Mikael Häggström I think the first points raised are covered in the 'Later research' para in the Functions section. Also the comments in the review of 2016 in Approach-avoidance conflict also covers this view. And I see this newer research as very relevant to the page. The section on navigation does have the heading Spatial memory and navigation. ? Shall not be making any more edits now. Happy holidays --Iztwoz (talk) 16:28, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Very well, I'll bring it to the editorial board shortly. Happy holidays to you too! Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:08, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Subcortical vs. Allocortical

While the page refers to the Hippocampus as sub-cortical (and indeed the hippocampal formation is technically located below the cortex), I believe there is wide consensus in the field that due to 1) the laminar structure of this brain region and 2) its tight coupling to the parahippocampal cortex, the hippocampus is considered allocortical (or possibly even cortical). In any case it is certainly not subcortical as a recent revision suggests There are any number of references to support this claim:

Wills, T. J.; Cacucci, F.; Burgess, N.; O'Keefe, J. (2010). "Development of the Hippocampal Cognitive Map in Preweanling Rats". Science. 328 (5985): 1573–1576

This is the source cited in the appropriate section of the Wikipedia Allocortex article.

Swenson RS. (2006). Review of clinical and functional neuroscience.

This source repeatedly points this difference out in the chapters on the limbic system and the cortex.

Perhaps this discussion is best summarized by the classic text "The Hippocampus Book" in the chapter "Hippocampal Neuroanatomy" by David Amaral and Lavenex Pierre:

"The reader who ventures from the relative safety of this book into the primary hippocampal literature should be aware that our usage of the term “hippocampal formation” is widely, though not universally, accepted. Some authors include only the allocortical (a term applied to cortical regions having fewer than six layers) regions as parts of the hippocampal formation. Three-layered cortical regions typically have a single neuronal cell layer with fiber-rich plexiform layers above and below the cell layer. In articles employing this usage, the hippocampal formation comprises the dentate gyrus, hippocampus, and subiculum. The remaining fields—presubiculum, parasubiculum, and entorhinal cortex—are then typically grouped together on the basis of their multilaminate structure under the term retrohippocampal (retro = behind) or parahippocampal (para = alongside or near) cortex."

A previous revision to this effect was reverted, so I hope moving this question to the talk page helps clarify this issue.

I would also point out that the reference cited for subcortical does not make any claims about the structural identity of the hippocampus. The word "subcortical" only pops up once when the chapter states the limbic system is at the border of the neocortex and subcortical structures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syntaxapse (talk • contribs) 19:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello Syntaxapse - I cannot find any reference on the page that states that the hippoacampus is subcortical - 'subcortical' is only mentioned three times, referring to input to the hippocampus and output and not staying that the hippocampus is subcortical. --Iztwoz (talk) 20:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC) Have just seen your page edit. I would also say that when I looked at different refs some did describe it as subcortical. --Iztwoz (talk) 20:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Hey Iztwoz - yeah sorry for any confusion, I have since gone ahead and changed subcortical to allocortical, it seemed more specific and correct. I agree that in some literature there is some confusion regarding the nomenclature (the hippocampus is after all below the cortex), but I think most primary respected texts in the field that take great care with their language would not refer to it as subcortical. Happy to talk about this more if you feel this is important or debatable - otherwise thanks for your other work cleaning up this page! Syntaxapse (talk) 20:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC) I would also add that I'm new to editing here, so apologies if I went about this in the wrong way! Syntaxapse (talk) 20:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. i agree with your edit. As for editing generally - anybody can make edits to any page, and if they are helpful they are very welcome. Best-- Iztwoz (talk) 21:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Quotation asked for

VeniVidiVicipedia is asking for a quotation re sentence on elaboration of cortex - refs are provided - is it just the word elaboration that is the concern? --Iztwoz (talk) 17:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Not really a concern, I just don't understand what it means. Seeing it in the original text hopefully makes it more clear. VeniVidiVicipedia (talk) 20:40, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello VeniVidiVicipedia - here is a quotation from Dorland's medical dictionary p 860 ...the hippocampus is a convoluted elevation of grey matter extending the entire length of the floor of the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle; it is part of the limbic system..... I hope this is enough ..... the sentence as is, has been on the page for over three years and has passed GA and FA criteria so as it seems just a personal request from you for a quotation I have provided it here and shall remove the inline tag. Best --Iztwoz (talk) 18:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I think I sort of understand it now. Is it correct that the two first sentences of that section say almost the same thing? Something like this?: The hippocampus is the relatively thin edge of the cortex folded up into the temporal lobe.

The information about it being the floor of the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle is not mentioned in the anatomy section. It is mentioned in the name section but people with a short attention span (me for example) might miss it. Thanks again! VeniVidiVicipedia (talk) 20:38, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

To clarify, there is no quotation. I used the word "elaboration" to describe the way the anatomy looks to me. If you think a different wording would be better, please feel free to edit the article. Looie496 (talk) 14:19, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

I tried to improve the wording. Comments? VeniVidiVicipedia (talk) 20:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Theta Rhythm

I found the first sentence not well-phrased and attempted to recast it. This then lead to questions as to what was actually being claimed, so I checked Buzsaki and was unable to find the specific claim that the hippocampus generates some of the largest EEG singals (as theta waves?) I did find something like it here, though https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16149083 Vertes, RP, 2005. I come at this from the perspective of trying to make the article more readable, not any great knowledge of the subject matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OmneBonum (talk • contribs) 08:25, 25 March 2017 (UTC) OmneBonum (talk) 19:13, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hippocampus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050216104718/http://homepage.mac.com/sanagnos/19bastreply2002.pdf to http://homepage.mac.com/sanagnos/19bastreply2002.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080625161337/http://osiris.rutgers.edu/BuzsakiHP/Publications/PDFs/BuzsakiTheta.pdf to http://osiris.rutgers.edu/BuzsakiHP/Publications/PDFs/BuzsakiTheta.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Addition of stress effects on hippocampus in relation to seizures

I propose editing the epilepsy and effects of cortisol sections to reflect findings in how stress changes the hippocampus such that it can induce seizures, or somehow integrating this information into the page:

Corticosteroid Effects on the Hippocampus

Exposure to stress results in the release of corticosteroids in the brain. Cortisol is the most common stress hormone in humans, and corticosterone the most common in mice and rats. They virtually act on every organ in the body, but in seizures the most important region is the hippocampus. The hippocampus contains mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) and glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) that have different affinities for corticosteroids. Rapid effects of stress are mediated through membrane associated MRs. This results in an array of effects within minutes of binding including increased frequency of small excitatory postsynaptic potentials and decreased frequency of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic potentials. Together these could cause hyper-excitability of the hippocampus and induce a seizure. Slow effects of stress take place on a level involving DNA or genomic level. When nuclear MRs and GRs are bound by corticosteroids they alter gene expression, the process that converts DNA to RNA to proteins. Changes induced include increased amplitude of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic potentials, and slowing the increase in number of calcium channels. By preventing the increase in number of calcium channels, it results in increased length of hyperpolarization which works to reduce the rate at which neurons can fire, which somewhat minimizes the effects of stress. These changes alter the responsiveness of the body to stress in order to maintain homeostasis. Chronic exposure to stress, however, results in disruption of these compensating mechanisms and drastic structural changes in the brain.

Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Effects on the Hippocampus

Corticotropin-Releasing hormone (CRH) is released following stress. Immediate effects include shortening of the hyperpolarization time which increases the frequency at which neurons can fire leading to an increased risk for seizures. Chronic exposure to CRH causes more complicated and less understood changes, but studies show it can cause decreased dendritic spines on neurons in the hippocampus.

Neurosteroid Effects on the Hippocampus

Neurosteroids have been shown to reduce excitability in the hippocampus and reduce seizure occurrence. With stress, endogenous neurosteroid concentrations increase such that a product of deoxycorticosterone breakdown binds to GABA-A receptors which then raises the threshold for seizures making them harder to generate. Seizures themselves have also been shown in studies to promote neurosteroid production in the brain, creating protective effects against subsequent seizures immediately following a seizure for a few hours. Exposure to chronic stress is associated with decreased concentrations of neurosteroids in the brain, suggesting higher susceptibility to seizures during periods of chronic stress. Gnada14 (talk) 02:07, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hippocampus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203010009/http://neuroscience.uth.tmc.edu/s1/introduction.html to http://neuroscience.uth.tmc.edu/s1/introduction.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:22, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Hippocampal theory of consciousness

I have removed a very long section on this topic. Given the breadth of this article, the sources may justify a brief mention of this topic, but certainly not more than that -- and I have doubts that even a paragraph would constitute appropriate weighting. The basic principle is that Wikipedia must not be used to publicize ideas that have not achieved widespread attention on their own. Looie496 (talk) 15:49, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

The material (which had been replicated on the consciousness page) has been re-inserted. This user was warned there about being blocked if they persisted in inserting the material without discussion. I think the same warning obviously should apply here about this material. TonyClarke (talk)

I already placed a final warning on the IP address talk page. Looie496 (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

I am not familiar with this 'talk' process, but i would like to object to you speaking of my persistent inserting of the same material; i made significant cuts and improvements along the way and included further references; and would have hoped that the material is looked at by someone competent in hippocampal theory and that a specific reason for the cutting out of the material is given; as it stands, the process seems arbitrary — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.226.152.202 (talk) 16:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for joining the discussion. I am totally competent in hippocampal theory -- you can find my real name on my user page and look up my publication record. The problem is not that the material you are adding is illegitimate, it is that you are misunderstanding the purpose of a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia's goal is to create an encyclopedia of the quality of Britannica, but freely accessible and broader in coverage. If you read Britannica's "hippocampus" article, would you expect to find the material you added? I doubt it -- the ideas may be legitimate, but they haven't yet drawn broad enough attention to get into an article like that. The same applies here. If you wanted to create a new article entitled Hippocampal theory of consciousness it would be much more reasonable -- although even then it would be necessary to alter the tone of the writing somewhat, as Wikipedia articles are intended to inform rather than persuade. Best regards, Looie496 (talk) 17:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Edit revert

Have just restored page to previous good version. The following removed para is posted here - Previously the page referred to three main ideas over the years - this was changed to two main ideas and the para inserted in the middle.

A recent theory by Legéndy argues that the hippocampus only creates a unique “pointer” to each new piece of episodic memory, in the form of a large cell group in CA3. The stored information itself mostly ends up in the neocortex rather than the hippocampus; and the pointer group only has the role of retrieving it. The peculiar distribution of the mossy cell associational projection is consistent with a biological effort to randomize (“stir”) the newly created pointer groups over a series of theta cycles, distributing their members thoughout CA3 and achieving that they, directly or indirectly, reach all cortical neurons in the areas address. The “memory theory” of the hippocampus is in this way reconciled with the seemingly contradictory fact that essentially all hippocampal pyramidal cells are “place cells,” through the observation that there are far more place cells having suitable parameters than are needed to make up any one pointer group; and the combinatorial diversity of group selection is more than enough to supply a lifetime’s worth of episode IDs. However, even in non-spatial memory retrieval, the place cell properties of the pointer group cells are often utilized indirectly, as when we retrace our steps to “jog our memory” of an event.

This content is variously found in Circuitry, Place cells and other sections. What is referred to as a recent theory is a review. The title of the review concerns the dentate gyrus which is not mentioned in the edit and which has material in dentate gyrus section. The ref given is not entered up properly. The last half of the paragraph is uncited and some OR. The prose is not up to the featured article status. Another major change was to upset the formatting of the three main ideas and to change this to two ? Then to enter a sentence claiming a heavy criticism and giving a completely inapt ref. As it states at top of editing page any changes to content needs to be addressed on talk page.--Iztwoz (talk) 23:43, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

References

Citations needed

I have seen multiple paragraphs and sentences in this article that are unsourced. Could someone knowledgable about this subject please fix this issue? This is an important featured article that was even peer-reviewed in a WikiJournal. For it to lose featured status in an FA-review would be a shame. Wretchskull (talk) 20:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

"Ammon's Horn"

This is by no means a common term in modern neuroscience. A PubMed search for "Ammon's Horn" indicates that the term saw peak use in publication in 1993 and has reduced consistently and significantly since, with 6 results containing "Ammon's Horn" published in 2021. So while true, including the term in the first paragraph may confuse or misdirect readers rather than inform them.

I propose moving mention of the term and associated reference below to the "name" section.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%22Ammon%27s+horn%22

CoreyinProgress (talk) 19:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

• CoreyinProgress Disagree with your proposal - the term is well-known and a recognised aka as shown in updated ref used. It is not so likely to be well-mentioned in PubMed as it is an aka.--Iztwoz (talk) 20:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

respectfully, I recognize that the term is an AKA, but I disagree that the term is well-known, and I maintain that it does not add to the introduction.

Evidence - 1) unfortunately, the updated reference added was not a properly formatted search, therefore most of the results were pertinent to the greek god "Ammun", the ammonites, or to sheep physiology. By the second page of results, there is no mention of the hippocampus or any subfield. Please see below link for search terms exclusive of non-relevant results searches for "ammon's horn" or "horn of ammon" result in 13 entries total, which tracks with my earlier point regarding pubmed. https://www.oxfordreference.com/search?btog=chap&o_1=OR&q0=%22ammon%27s+horn%22&q1=%22horn+of+ammon%22

2) More anecdotally, I asked a room of 5 neuroscience PhD candidates and post-docs if anyone recognized the term, and only one of us did. Many of us actively research and publish regarding the hippocampus. This is certainly anecdotal evidence, but if Wikipedia is written for lay-person comprehension, including AKAs that are no longer commonly used in the field does not add value.

Again, I am not debating the term is an AKA, but it would be better placed in the "name" section, as it is more of historical interest than modern usefulness.

CoreyinProgress (talk) 03:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

The misnomer CA4

I suggest removing the term CA4 from this article. This is a misnomer that was introduced by Lorente de Nó (1934) and was suggested abandoned already in 1978 by Amaral in his very thorough paper on the cell types of the dentate gyrus in rats. Lorente de No's CA4 was actually the polymorphic layer of the dentate gyrus (his second reflected blade) that he thought was a continuation of the CA-field populated by modified pyramids. It has later been established that this is not the case and that the CA4 of Lorente is not continuous with the CA but is the basal polymoprhic layer of the DG. It thus makes no sense to say that the CA4 inserts into the DG, as the CA4 is actually the polymorphic layer of the DG. Naming this layer CA4 also infers that it is part of the CA-field, which is not true. What inserts into the DG is the most proximal end of CA3 and this should also be updated in the text. This has been established amongst others by the same authors that are referred to (mistakenly) in the section where CA4 is presented at first.

For references on the misnomer CA4 see: Blackstad (1956), Amaral (1978), and more recent reviews on anatomy where the term is abandoned: van Strien et al. (2009), Cappaert et al. (2015).

The hippocampal field is full of strange nomenclature. Since Amaral conclusion has not been proven wrong over close to five decades it is well beyond time that we implement his observations and remove this misnomer.

Jsblacks (talk) 15:33, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:URFA/2020

"Anatomy" is largely unsourced (Also mentioned one year ago). File:Place Cell Spiking Activity Example.png is unsourced. Also: why are some images numbered ("Image 8: Example of a one-second EEG theta wave", etc.) while others aren't ("Rats and cognitive maps", "Hippocampus (lowest pink bulb)", "Hippocampus highlighted in green on coronal T1 MRI images", etc.) A455bcd9 (talk) 11:18, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

AfD-merge from Between-systems memory interference model

There's a merge outcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Between-systems memory interference model mandating the merge of Between-systems memory interference model to here. It seems highly impractical to merge 13k highly technical article into a 130k featured article. Suggestions welcome from those supporting the merge outcome: OwenX, Maxim Masiutin, Eddie891. Perhaps redirect or delete (too technical to be helpful?). Klbrain (talk) 07:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

I agree; there's no need to merge the entire 1400-word article here. The 75-word lede, plus a brief paragraph linking to Multiple trace theory, should be sufficient for a general article about the hippocampus. Retrograde amnesia is already mentioned, so this would be a natural fit in the Function/Role in memory subsection. Owen× ☎ 11:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

I have no particular opinion, I keep it up to you. Thank you for attracting me for the discussion, however! Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

  Y Merger complete. , selectively; happy for others to add more if they're in the mood! Klbrain (talk) 20:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)